posted on Jun, 2 2005 @ 03:22 PM
what? Not massive day to day coverage of "runaway brides", speculation about another disgusting trial involving a pop star, or a three to four page
spread regarding the identity of a political tattletale over 40 years irrelevant?
Scary. Next he's gonna be preaching for non-biased, spin free, truth. One that focusses on both sides of an issue, and the positives and negatives of
naw, it'll never work. Not "entertaining" enough. More bewbies! More fluff! More speculation instead of investigation! More stock footage aired
instead of live film! And don't forget camera angles to exaggerate or minimize crowd size or damage from disasters.
If he honestly believes what he's saying, it has got to suck bigtime seeing the system you built turn into the very type of news system you tried to