you've probably seen this but, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 31-8-2003 @ 12:20 PM by ktprktpr
Satyr shoots straight with " I've yet to find anything that proves it to be a hoax."

Trying to keep the dream alive ... I don't mean to come across as obessed I kinda believe this guy, but I'm still reserved. Waiting for 2005 or something.

Loki:
The reason you can just can't use Linux on anything is that the kernel has to be rewritten (parts of it) to the specific hardware. You can't just dump C code on anything ... fopen.c, etc., has to be able to interact with the hardware, as do many other libraries.

Springer: + Hmmm bring up real good points.
Since this is all going by the Many Worlds theory, sure "he" wouldn't pop back from the past, but another "he" that would. And here's the kicker, if "he" doesn't pop back than there's some other (probably infinite) world line where "he" did come back it, and the trip was worth it. You never know and you have to at least try.

"
If each world line is separate from the others, then wouldn't the
consequences of your actions now have no effect on your original world line?
Yes, that's correct.
"

So he doesn't care and is going out for the world line where "he" does come back.

About not caring. Humans don't operate logically, but emotionally. He does care and does not care if you (a select group of people) believe him. He wants to get his story out.

"The obvious first answer is that the only world line of consequence is my own and I don't care what happens here. That however, is not the case. I have shown these documents in order that people might consider the possibility. I do not expect people to believe them."

About running to Canada (which I've been thinking of doing for other reasons):
"I've noticed that when most Americans think about Canada in this time,
they think about pine trees, chooks and back-bacon. It may interest you to
know that most Canadians in 2036 are some of the most efficient, ruthless
and dangerous people I know. God help Quebec."

Europe: "17. Yes, Europe is a mess."


reply posted on 31-8-2003 @ 12:39 PM by ktprktpr
Testing the machine is easy. Attach a program that interfaces with the circuits. make it go back like a couple of minutes. If it worked you'd know Also you can code it to come right back ifyou want.


-----------------
From UFO City (This guy queried an old IBM programmer for the 5100):

Here is his response:

Hello Mike,

The 5100 did not have a true operating system. Any similarity to one was provided by the “keyboard” code. It also provided for some basic debug things and of course it had its share of “hooks” to do other things. There were two emulators provided, a System 34 emulator for the Basic language, and a System 360 emulator for executing the APL interactive language.

One hook that was never documented for external IBM users was one for launching programs, written in the System 360 machine language, from APL. I personally used this hook for manipulating large arrays because it was faster and reduced memory requirements. APL has a habit of creating multiple copies of a variable while manipulating it.

I believe you may be thinking about the 360 emulator.
Sincerely,

Bob Dubke
eXport Ventures Corporation
Rochester, MN 55901
(XOX) XOX-X0X0
www.export-ventures.com


What that means, I'm not sure. Maybe someone good with computers can explain it all to me. Thanks.



Mazz
Posted on: 2003/8/16 6:59


Re: It's time
OK, what it doesn't answer is whether the 5100 was/is the only device capable of emulating and manipulating APL. He seems to think it was more capable than anything else of higher processing speeds when manipulating this kind of language and that tells me that it is not the only device with the ability to do it.
What we need to know is if there is a system/machine that can do the same job, but better than the 5100 today. If there is, then our friend John has his information wrong, and for someone who comes from the future, you would think he would know that.
Mazz



Anonymous
Posted on: 2003/8/16 7:48


Re: It's time

The key statement is... "One hook that was never documented for external IBM users was one for launching programs, written in the System 360 machine language, from APL."

That's almost exactly what John said. What exactly is it that was never documented?

After reading John's posts, it doesn't appear that APL was the key. It was the ability of the 5100 to translate all the various machine languages that came before it. Is this what a post-nuclear, post-Y2K society would need to bring all those old computers back on-line?

It would be interesting to find out if the Yanks are using old computers to bring the power back up in New England.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 19 days ago with 277 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 15 days ago with 122 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 17 days ago with 86 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 17 days ago with 83 member flags
10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 3 days ago with 77 member flags