A couple of thoughts, and an email reply:
1. Unless RG has a reason to lie, it would reasonable to assume he's telling the truth. When dealing with liars there's no way to tell one way or
the other, but RG is not a liar (or hasn't shown himself to be).
2. It occured to me that perhaps RG didn't post that "clue" at ufocity ... it was noted that the JT could've been formulated by a thinktank group.
Perhaps an old member pointed a finger at RG as a practical joke. Perhaps the other members would confess, if they did such a thing.
3. Finally, when it first came out that it was a "clear haox" (not so certain though) after a moments reflection I felt kind of stupid. The fact is,
just look at today's posts, there a lot of other stuff going that could use this attention and energy. It's kinda of silly to worry about a time
traveller when the PA2 is around the corner if OPEC doesn't vote the American way, etc.
Here's the reply:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, ktpr wrote:
> I'll bother you one last time.
>
> You might get a big kick out of this thread:
>
www.abovetopsecret.com...
>
> Pages 4 and 5 are more interesting. We found it out
> was a hoax just before we were going to "rigorously"
> catalog everything. Whew
Yeah, the real problem is that this sort of thing becomes an infinite timesink -- a real black hole for human energy and creativity, fueled bymasses
of ignorance if not the ignorance of the masses.
I am a real, live theoretical physicist. I've read a significant fraction of all science fiction (or is it a fraction of all significant science
fiction). I've >>written