It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld warned on Friday that China's failure to match economic freedoms with democratic reforms could raise tensions and undermine its growing influence in the world.
"We anticipate that the relationship with India will continue to be strengthened. With respect to China, it's not completely clear which way they are going because you have the tension I characterised between the nature of their political system and the nature of their economic system," he told reporters.
Even now, China does not appear very receptive to what could be key areas of military cooperation with Washington, including joint search and rescue missions, said Blumenthal, now with the conservative American Enterprise Institute.
"India clearly is a major power ... It has a democratic political system. It has a relatively free economic system. We have what I would characterise as an excellent relationship with India. From a mil-to-mil (military-to-military) standpoint, it has improved and strengthened every year," Rumsfeld said.
While China's economy has opened up, "their political system is less free and I suspect that over a period of some years there will be a tension there.They will grow less fast and they will be a less influential country," he said.
The biggest concern, they said, was a new push by China in recent years to gather intelligence on military-related technology and strategic policy secrets.
"China would be the biggest now by a fair way," said one source, who said Chinese spies now outnumbered Russian agents who were previously Australia's biggest epsionnage concern.
"They have built up their capabilities over the last 10 years and are more aggressive in their activities," the source was quoted as saying.
China has one of the largest diplomatic corps in Australia, with 40 registered diplomats.
Chinese-Australian ties were strained in 1995 by revelations that the embassy in Canberra had been bugged as part of a joint US-Australian operation.
The new counter-espionage unit has been set up within the Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), the government's main intelligence agency, and is already operational, The Australian said
Originally posted by chinawhite
why would i care about what rumfields thinks.
i dont care if china spys on australia. i doesn't bother me the slightest
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
do you know how much foriegn companies invest in china. $50bil. the government invest a lot more than that.
And American soldiers wouldn't have to patrol anything. The role of a conqueror is not the same as that of a peacekeeper. America has no need to play nice with the Chinese population.
And I really wonder how the Chinese would respond after we destroyed a few of their major cities completely. It worked pretty well for the Mongols, after all.
Its like vietnam but a lot larger. you would need at least 12million+ garrison troops
No it's not. In Vietnam we faced an enemy that could hide in the jungles, and launch attacks on American troops who were only allowed to patrol certain areas, then run back to hide behind imaginary lines.
Their nation was never overrun, so it was far easier to supply their troops and keep fighting. They were also supported by outside forces, such as Russia and China.
America was fighting a defensive war run by politicians. It would be nothing like a war with China.
Originally posted by M6D
Originally posted by Disturbed Deliverer
do you know how much foriegn companies invest in china. $50bil. the government invest a lot more than that.
And American soldiers wouldn't have to patrol anything. The role of a conqueror is not the same as that of a peacekeeper. America has no need to play nice with the Chinese population.
And I really wonder how the Chinese would respond after we destroyed a few of their major cities completely. It worked pretty well for the Mongols, after all.
Its like vietnam but a lot larger. you would need at least 12million+ garrison troops
No it's not. In Vietnam we faced an enemy that could hide in the jungles, and launch attacks on American troops who were only allowed to patrol certain areas, then run back to hide behind imaginary lines.
Their nation was never overrun, so it was far easier to supply their troops and keep fighting. They were also supported by outside forces, such as Russia and China.
America was fighting a defensive war run by politicians. It would be nothing like a war with China.
id like to see you get away with that numbnuts, ever heard of two things, geneva convention and the media, way to ho showing american ignorance, despite how big your country is, youd never get away with war crimes to that scale, id like to see you try and kill civilians though, scumbag, you disgust me
Originally posted by chinawhite
this american superioty is being built up facing third world countries america hasn't faced the full-burnt of a military war machine ever since its independence.
Originally posted by truttseeker
Originally posted by chinawhite
this american superioty is being built up facing third world countries america hasn't faced the full-burnt of a military war machine ever since its independence.
If america hasnt fought the full brunt of a military force since it independence then what do you call world war II. Japanese war machine was crazy. Meanwhile your great country china was gettin slapped around by the chinese. So much for the indescribable chinese war machine
Originally posted by Stealth Spy
Originally posted by M6D
i have to ask, whats with the problem against china?
a burning desire to avenge the humiliation of 1962 and win back all the territories that China stole from India after launching a surprise war against an unprepared India soon after India had signed a freindship pact with the latter.
Originally posted by chinawhite
Originally posted by truttseeker
Originally posted by chinawhite
this american superioty is being built up facing third world countries america hasn't faced the full-burnt of a military war machine ever since its independence.
If america hasnt fought the full brunt of a military force since it independence then what do you call world war II. Japanese war machine was crazy. Meanwhile your great country china was gettin slapped around by the chinese. So much for the indescribable chinese war machine
wow the japanese war machine. america out-classed japan in inovation and production. and the western front in ww2 againest germany . the russians took over 70% of the german army by itself for over 3 years
french lost in vietnam
I wasn't being pro US just stating the facts. Actually I hate US companies like Walmart, if you can call them american, that by everything from China then send all of the money back to the HQ rather than putiing it back into the commutinies that they rape by killing off the little guys, I am proud we dont have a walmart in my hometown.
I consider myself oregonian first american second but I am not a mindless troll that blindly follows my own leadership let alone a leadership of a state that is considered a threat!
Originally posted by Stealth Spy
Gandhi was one fo the worst leader in history.
It was sloely because of his crappy views on secularism and universal brotherhood and policies that india has ended up with so many muslims in it. It would have been so easy to declare india a hindu nation and send all the remaining muslims to pakistan at the time of partition. But this naive non-violence loving man had to intervine and spoil the party.
His faithful apprentice Neheru refused to use the powerful indian air in the 1962 war on the grounds of non-violence !!
Although Gandhi must be revered for his sacrifice and goodness, his actions never yeilded any good result (both short term and long term).
Thus his assasination is fully justified.
Originally posted by Char2c35t
while russia was fighting the army the us and british were bombing the factories which made russian's fight easier without the bombings it would have been a different war for russia. if it wasnt for the US and brits china would still be under japanese rule! plus what wars has china fought and won? tibet! ww2? no. korea? no vietnam? oohhh china wasnt in that one lol yeah right! no. oh the 1962 war with india? so what super power has china fought? no one.
China is even more unproven in war than the russians are let alone the US which has been engaging in fighting, oh if you didnt know that a veteran military always kicks the crap out of a green army ask the french.
so what super power has china fought? no one.