It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
i never said a 'dictator' did i?
Originally posted by iksmodnad
A global dictator is just paranoia,
errr did i say the select and un select few, i think i did. The next dictatorship wont be a figurehead but a faceless groupe of elitists. thanks mate you have just reasurred me that im right.
it will most likely be ruled by a council of presidents and rulers from other countries all around the world that will vote on the issues.
Originally posted by stumason
Anyway, whats so bad about the EU/NWO whatever? Why would it be so bad to have a one world government for example? Are you that racist you want to live on our piddly little island ignoring everyone else?
Originally posted by rustiswordz
i never said a 'dictator' did i?
Originally posted by iksmodnad
A global dictator is just paranoia,errr did i say the select and un select few, i think i did. The next dictatorship wont be a figurehead but a faceless groupe of elitists. thanks mate you have just reasurred me that im right.
it will most likely be ruled by a council of presidents and rulers from other countries all around the world that will vote on the issues.
it will most likely be ruled by a council of presidents and rulers from other countries all around the world that will vote on the issues.
Excuse me? We have witnessed many times, people find power and then find corruption. Secularists to religious leaders.
Unless I break a rule, do not tell me what to say. Especially when what I say has been witnessed.
Originally posted by Yazman
Excuse me? We have witnessed many times, people find power and then find corruption. Secularists to religious leaders.
Unless I break a rule, do not tell me what to say. Especially when what I say has been witnessed.
The exact opposite has been witnessed too - people find power and do not find corruption. If you're going to make pseudoscientific claims about something as baseless as "man is evil by nature", then you should really back them up before doing so.
[edit on 31/5/05 by Yazman]
Originally posted by yanchek
This was only round one. Round two starts on 1. of June when Dutch have their referendum.
stumason
World War? Against who? Why? When? Eh?
Do the NWO theories not come out of the US originally, where they are naturally sceptical of foreigners/UN etc?
ThomasCrowne
the problem is, man is evil in nature. Give us a little power and we turn into tyrants. Power corrupts, total power corrupts totally.
And don't think that your military will cut you some slack because they are your countrymen; it'll be the forces of another country that will "police" your nation.
Infinite
you cant blame them seeings the world is turning in the direction of which these theories are becomng fact.
Originally posted by infinite
Truthisoutthere,
is there really a need to post the same thing twice?
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Originally posted by Yazman
Excuse me? We have witnessed many times, people find power and then find corruption. Secularists to religious leaders.
Unless I break a rule, do not tell me what to say. Especially when what I say has been witnessed.
The exact opposite has been witnessed too - people find power and do not find corruption. If you're going to make pseudoscientific claims about something as baseless as "man is evil by nature", then you should really back them up before doing so.
[edit on 31/5/05 by Yazman]
You should really step off your high horse, pal, as I do not recognize you as an authority of how to communicate.
As you seem to be needing a memory jogger, let's go back in history - just a small step back. Remember a little guy named Adolph? This little bugger wanted to rule the world and wanted no counter to his power. He was a bit on the rude side, wouldn't you say? As a matter of fact, there was another little fella on the other side of the world trying to do the same thing! As I recall, human rights weren't on his mind, either. Fortunately for the world, there were other powers still free from the control of those two loonies that we were able to stop them.
A little later, another type of government with another bunch of ruffians came about to show us how a totalitarian government could really lower the population level of some regions. Stalin is the most memorable of the ne-er-do-wells of that particular bunch, but I'm very glad that there were nations standing against them getting control of the world.
Now that we didn't have to travel too far back in history to give enough examples to show that people in power have a tendancy to develop God-Complexes, let's think of another angle of this dilemma; just who's form of government would you prefer? Your own, I'm sure. Well, no surprise. Not me, my government is a soup sandwich with the politicians out for themselves and the "law enforcement" becoming more authoritarian every day.
No, I'd say that the best way would be with the concepts written about by the Founding Fathers of the united states of America. You know; limited government, the people have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, all that stuff. It doesn't work too well, though, as it didn't take humans long at all to screww up this little experiment in society, and there's no way that such a concept would work in a world where tyranny and despotism is more the rule than not.
You should really step off your high horse, pal, as I do not recognize you as an authority of how to communicate.