It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Centiment
Would anyone here really prefer been called "stupid" rather than "bitch" ?
They are already existing mixed-lodges, as someone just told me elsewhere.
They aren't official, or recognized.
There is an authority that decides this.
If all jurisdictions vote, there's an authority that decide what matters are to be voted for.
>>>>There is no governing body for the whole of Freemasonry.
Than why are mixed-lodges non-officialized ?
Who officializes a lodge ????
>>>to represent them at Grand Lodge.
Ok...thanks for finally answering the "right" way.
>>>antagonize, poke fun, and insult a Fraternity which it is obvious you >>>know little about.
I've read lots. They are things that make sense and some that don't.
I criticize the lack of self-criticism in masonry.
Some masons believe that masonry is fraternity.
That is the first idea that get to them.
Some others think of masonry as the esoteric knowledge
they get from it. That is the first idea that get to them.
Some believe that one and the other are inseparable.
That masonry knowledge (what you are finally able
to understand once you got rid of the symbols,
when you are able to signify their meanings) is
loosing all meaning once it is outside the masonry.
I think a "buddhist" can be "buddhist"
without being a "buddhist".
If you can decipher what I mean:
take the philosophy and knowledge but reject
the dogmas related to iconography, traditions,
nouns, laws, and history.
I also believe that a "mason" can be "mason"
without being a "mason".
That is why I believe in a school
that kills the...I repeat...iconography (symbols),
traditions, nouns, laws, and history.
And still respect the knowledge
and its application.
>>>> the materials you (*ahem* illegally) obtained...
Illegally ? Where are you coming with that ?
Not really. The esoteric library was
personally dedicated.
>>>> more respect for institutions such as Masonry
I would already prefer if masons worked by invitation only.
Masons become masons not knowing what is up.
Rosis know what they are getting into.
I sound like I despise masonry, but in fact I like
the best stuff about it, that means, what is left once
you get rid of secrets, oaths, and the dubious
social insurgence of fraternity.
Accepting everything as facts is not
trusting people's power to change things.
Originally posted by Centiment
They are already existing mixed-lodges, as someone just told me elsewhere.
They aren't official, or recognized.
There is an authority that decides this.
If all jurisdictions vote, there's an authority that decide what matters are to be voted for.
>>>>There is no governing body for the whole of Freemasonry.
Than why are mixed-lodges non-officialized ?
Who officializes a lodge ????
Originally posted by akilles
So I ask, is intrigue really a sufficient reason...
Originally posted by akilles
How does history allow this expression?
Originally posted by akilles
Now, looking at the kind of people who have been Freemasons, unaccepted, irregular and otherwise, why would you choose to use such a vehicle?
So I ask, is intrigue really a sufficient reason to associate yourself with so many men you will never get to know, and so many, that you really don't want to?
Originally posted by Centiment
>>>>LANDMARKS of Freemasonry.
Who can change a landmark ?
>>>each lodge holds a vote and then sends their vote to the Grand Lodge >>>for a final vote.
There is a pinpoint of democracy in there that is hopeful.
>>>>>then it is clandestine.
I think that if a mixed lodge becomes "big enough" and install a lot of great hospitals, it will become problematic to refuse their official status.
Originally posted by Centiment
If I had 12 kids, and they were the only living
humans on earth, would I want some
of them to start a fraternity ?
Most living people are living for their own security and sad little selves. They don't care about implementing systems that would benefit to everyone equally for the future generations.
I salute the Robin Hood of masonry, whover that is.
The guy who took from masonry and gave it to the people.
The "dumbed down masses" as someone referred to on another
thread that was terminated.
Simply starting a mixed lodge is going in the right way.
Women have less ego than men, I think they can balance
something.
Originally posted by The Axeman
I salute the Robin Hood of masonry, whover that is.
The guy who took from masonry and gave it to the people.
Funny how the "Robin Hoods" you refer to are only interested in selling books or getting back at Masons who they may feel have wronged them by not admitting them to the Fraternity.
Originally posted by Centiment
Dogma VS Democracy.
Better save the landmarks of freemasonry than acknowledge a mixed lodge that would implement large hospitals.
You are heartless.