posted on May, 23 2005 @ 02:49 PM
I personally don't have any scientific opinion on Abductions, but personally I always believe the people who claim to have been abducted are full of
The reasons are:
1) Their story is extremely unlikely, with no witnesses or trace evidence
2) Their story is either incomplete, or very unspecific - much like one would speak when trying to recall or describe a dream
Now one could credibly argue that if the Aliens are highly sophisticated they would not leave witnesses or evidence, and they could easily be
manipulating the mental state of the "abductee" thus producing the hazy / dreamlike descriptions of these encounters.
However am I the only one who feels that all the abductions claims / studies only confuses the UFO issue?
And since abductions seem to never leave any signifigant evidence - shouldn't we focus on the tangible evidence that can be found on UFO's?
I mean pictures, video, government documents, alien artifacts, etc..
That is the kind of stuff that will lead to disclosure!
I know I will probably get shouted down for my narrow-mindedness but I just think abductions should be discussed in private specialized support
groups/forums and we should use the more general UFOlogy forums to help consolidate and discuss the little real, solid, physical evidence we can
manage to get our hands on.
Anyone here agree with me?