It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
5. Have there been any ideas on how the craft crashed and why? Was it shot down? Did it hit something? Was it a 'pilot' error? Was it a technical error? If it's assumed that it was a saucer shape, would that help in working out possible flaws in design that could be subject the pilots to a 'risk' factor when flying in our atmosphere? We know these UFOs can move in ways our planes can't, so why would it crash? Using what we know on fighter and other human aircraft crashes, could this info help determine how or why a saucer would crash at such a speed and force?
6. Were the bodies taken basically settled upon as being the basic Grey type? Has there been any research into which Grey type this is, where they'd be from, who they'd work for? (there's a few different ones arn't there?)
I know this crash occured over 50 years ago and it's been through a washing machine of disinformation but are there any more avenues to try to crack with this topic or are there MORE crashes, recoveries etc that offer more proof or more pieces to the puzzle?
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
1. The debris found wasn't able to be bent, cut, burnt or broken yet the debris was found in pieces scattered over a large area? So, at some point/force/pressure it is able to be broken then, has there been any further research or hypothesis on when that breaking point is?
2. If it requires such a huge amount pressure or force to break this material, how could a body be retrieved from the crash site?
3. Have there been any other indications of the symbols found on the I-beams in other areas? For example, do any Crop Circles depict similar symbology, any reports from abductees of reading similar symbology? Any work done to crack the symbology from descriptions or evidence?
4. Is it possible to work out roughly from known information, a level of speed/force of the impact to determine how hard this craft hit the Earth? It must of been very hard to break this material into pieces over such a wide area. Is it possible that there were 2 craft and 2 crashes or 1 craft which 'bounced' before it crashed?
5. Have there been any ideas on how the craft crashed and why?
6. Were the bodies taken basically settled upon as being the basic Grey type? Has there been any research into which Grey type this is, where they'd be from, who they'd work for? (there's a few different ones arn't there?)
1. The debris found wasn't able to be bent, cut, burnt or broken yet the debris was found in pieces scattered over a large area? So, at some point/force/pressure it is able to be broken then, has there been any further research or hypothesis on when that breaking point is? Or is there any government/scienctific slips/evidence that shows they researched this or used knowledge gained on creating better materials on Earth?
2. If it requires such a huge amount pressure or force to break this material, how could a body be retrieved from the crash site? Was this body or bodies meant to have been dead or alive? Whole or in part? OR where there parts to this craft that survived in tact and act similar to how a roll cage acts in a race car in which the bodies were inside meaning large pieces were salvaged that would contain technology?
3. Have there been any other indications of the symbols found on the I-beams in other areas? For example, do any Crop Circles depict similar symbology, any reports from abductees of reading similar symbology? Any work done to crack the symbology from descriptions or evidence?
4. Is it possible to work out roughly from known information, a level of speed/force of the impact to determine how hard this craft hit the Earth? It must of been very hard to break this material into pieces over such a wide area. Is it possible that there were 2 craft and 2 crashes or 1 craft which 'bounced' before it crashed?
5. Have there been any ideas on how the craft crashed and why? Was it shot down? Did it hit something? Was it a 'pilot' error? Was it a technical error? If it's assumed that it was a saucer shape, would that help in working out possible flaws in design that could be subject the pilots to a 'risk' factor when flying in our atmosphere? We know these UFOs can move in ways our planes can't, so why would it crash? Using what we know on fighter and other human aircraft crashes, could this info help determine how or why a saucer would crash at such a speed and force?
6. Were the bodies taken basically settled upon as being the basic Grey type? Has there been any research into which Grey type this is, where they'd be from, who they'd work for? (there's a few different ones arn't there?)
I know this crash occured over 50 years ago and it's been through a washing machine of disinformation but are there any more avenues to try to crack with this topic or are there MORE crashes, recoveries etc that offer more proof or more pieces to the puzzle?
- Is that Russian film of a saucer sticking out of the ground debunked as a fake? (looks it but i haven't looked into any real research on it)
- What other famous or infamous crashes, recoveries, evidence are there in regards to craft that the government is suppose to have? I remember reading ages ago about a guy who was doing work on building a homemade saucer type engine/project years ago and apperently the government took over his work and even had him look at an engine he couldn't explain. He said he walked inside it and it seemed to be living in a sense. Wish i could find more on that one, maybe it's common knowledge amongst the better researchers here and been debunked?
Anyway, there's heaps of questions but most of them are probably answered somewhere but for the most part, i haven't found any info going further into what is already known about Roswell. Most work rather puts the puzzle together in a way that disproves the official story (which is still worthy work of course!).
Originally posted by Gazrok
While many different witnesses attest to the presence of symbols on the I-beams, only one (to my knowledge) has drawn a rendition of it (Dr. Jesse Marcel Jr.). You can see these in the threads mentioned btw. Any decoding efforts would not be publicly known of course. Since some of the symbols are rather simplistic, it isn’t unfathomable that crop circles might have them, but it’s a pretty loose connection (especially to those like myself, who contend that so far, the evidence is strongly in favor of pranksters only).
Gazrok,
First of all, I want to thank you for sharing so much information. I know that is not easy to research so much material with such an eye for detail, and I, along with many other posters, very much appreciate your willingness to give such well-considered and informative posts.
With that in mind, I have a question for you. What evidence (and if it is already posted somewhere and I missed it, I apologize in advance) have you come across to persuade you that pranksters are responsible for the crop circle phenomenon? The evidence I have read rather strongly points to some kind of non-human intervention. For example:
1.) The speed of the appearance of the forms; appearing overnight, and in some cases in much shorter time frames.
2.) The undamaged grains, which would seem to be exceptionally difficult to preserve by a handful of pranksters using wooden planks to flatten the plants.
3.) The allegation that some of the circles feature elaborately twined grains, a degree of effort that would seem to demand more time than the pranksters might have.
4.) The fact that the stalks continue to grow parallel to the ground after the event.
Most of these topics were brought up in Jim Marrs' "Alien Agenda" and, while I cannot testify to the validity of his research, I haven't been able to discover any information that renders any of his positions untenable. I freely admit, however, that I don't know much about the phenomena beyond Mr. Marrs' section, and that's why I'm asking for your position.
Thanks!
4. Is it possible to work out roughly from known information, a level of speed/force of the impact to determine how hard this craft hit the Earth? It must of been very hard to break this material into pieces over such a wide area. Is it possible that there were 2 craft and 2 crashes or 1 craft which 'bounced' before it crashed?
I'll state that I am no expert on crop circles. I've seen numerous specials showing exactly how con-men can produce amazing examples in just a couple of hours, and with rudimentary tools, answering nearly all of the questions put forth. The often terrestrial symbols, etc. used in the designs are further indicative of a human source for these. To me, the evidence for an extraterrestrial connection was simply never strong enough to warrant further investigation...
Originally posted by Phood
I'll state that I am no expert on crop circles. I've seen numerous specials showing exactly how con-men can produce amazing examples in just a couple of hours, and with rudimentary tools, answering nearly all of the questions put forth. The often terrestrial symbols, etc. used in the designs are further indicative of a human source for these. To me, the evidence for an extraterrestrial connection was simply never strong enough to warrant further investigation...
I'll admit that I also belive most crop circles(at least the most recent ones) are hoaxes, but don't they sometimes find cropcirles with traces of
radiation, and other "unexplainable" things?