reply to post by Uncle Gravity
Nice 'red-herring/ ad hominem/character assassination' argument there, mate. Use the sex scandals (which have nothing to do with the Knights of
Columbus) to draw attention away from the KofC and onto the RCC, blow them out of proportion to assassinate the moral character of the Church instead
of addressing what it actually does, teaches and is, and impose guilt upon the KofC by association with the RCC... all on top of your previous
fabrications concerning the fourth degree's oath. Classic.
I can do that too! You live in Glasgow and you hate Irish people. The British murdered John Connolly in 1916 and parliament caused the 'Irish Potato
Famine.' And the British used known criminals (Black&Tans) from England to be the police force in Ireland, to enforce the law through brutality and
bigotry. Therefore, you hate Irish people because Glasgow is in the UK. See how that works? That's a logical fallacy called 'bifurcation.'
People just like you are the reason the Knights of Columbus were made, to protect Catholics from bigotry. Catholics were held in extreme suspicion and
viciously discriminated against. They couldn't find work because no one would hire Catholics, and if they did find work they were still uninsured
because the insurance companies would charge them insane rates, discriminating against them because of their Catholicity. The Catholics were in a
terrible situation, because of bigots like yourself; they would work until their bodies quit, and then they would leave their orphans and their widows
destitute, and nobody cared. The knights provided a solution to that problem, Catholics caring for Catholics in the manner of chivalry and charity.
Provide real documentation, bullet-proof, ironclad, air-tight facts against the Pope or leave him out of it. Yeah, there have been sexual abuses, but
most of it wasn't paedophilia. In fact, an extremely small portion of the offenses were paedophilia. Most of the abuses were cases of homosexual
pederasty, where perverted teenage boys were consenting to and frequently initiating sexual activity with their perverted homosexual priests.
Realistically, in Sweden 15 is the legal age for marriage and sexual activity. Most of the "so-called" abuse cases were consensual, and did occur
with people aged 15 to 17.
So, seeing that you are an irreligious, and obviously amoral person (since you have no qualms about lying), why aren't you attacking the nation of
Sweden? Why aren't you attacking Saudi Arabia? Or any number of Islamic nations? Why aren't you saying something about cultures where your right of
initiation into manhood is to be the forced sex toy of an older man... like in Afghanistan? Aye? Because you're a bloody hypocrite, that's why.
Because you come from a post-Christian society that's bigoted against Christianity and its morals and values and seek any opportunity to smear the
Church and the priesthood so that you can abolish their moral authority over society and yourself, because you stand for relativism, which means you
really stand for nothing.
You know what mate... one in eleven males in normal society is or will be a sex offender (hebophiliac, pederast, paedophile). That's one in eleven
males off the street, randoms. You know what percentage of priests are sex offenders? ONE IN ONE HUNDRED! One in one hundred! Which means that you can
trust a priest TEN TIMES MORE than one of your own countrymen. A Catholic priest is ten times less likely to commit a sex crime than their average
male counterpart. So what were you saying about pedophiles, hypocrite? For all we know, YOU are a paedophile. After all, you are ten times more likely
of it than the people you are accusing and making bigoted blanket statements about. You want to talk about conspiracies? You're buying into one by
regurgitating this tripe about the Church. Now, quit failing to death all over these message boards.