Originally posted by anthromagnonadonis85

Originally posted by groingrinder
The first pic is a 3d model rendered in a pretty damn good software package like Maya.

How do you know this??? Has it been proven??

3D modeling is what I do. The first pic screams "MODEL....MODEL......MODEL...."

No photograph taken will EVER be that clear. When you are that close to a bigfoot , no matter how brave you feel now, you will be #ting your pants and quaking in your boots!!! The man in direct fear of his life is not thinking "Let's see f/32 for depth of field leaves me with a shutter speed of 1/600th second to try and capture the branch speeding for my face."

Is there any way that you have some equipment that could test this picture to see if it really is computer engineered?

to me the first picture looks like a "bigfoot action figure" lol, put on the edge of a small pond. Notice the algae (spelling) where do you see algae that huge?

Considering how large bigfoot is, look at the algae and grass. Just doesnt add up really.


The 2nd image, could be anything, dont really have a clear definition of how "real" or how "fake" it is. Colors look almost cartoonish, could be an animation.

Just my guesses.

First one, in my opininon, is clearly a fake. One I posted link to from the same site is blurry enough to be a "could be" shot. ( either or!) This makes it, IMO, a more believable pic. IMO. Sorry if this is not the proof you seek. As I said before - looks like a plastic bigfoot stuck in a puddle. You asked for opinions - that is mine. No offence. I can't give you proof and neither can anyone else, except maybe the owner of the original image..........

The first one is obviously fake. why? the expression on it s face! . well thats one of many and i agree the thing looks more like plastic. I have seen very little evidence of bigfoots, but some intersting is the show where they go out with night vision and something starts throwing rocks at them.
anyway apparently these are very elusive creatures and their populations are rather small and are in remote areas.

If it is an Action Figure, then that is awesome detail and I would buy one and make as many photographs as I could and be like, look this is Bigfoot, I would have a friggin series of photographs and I would be rich and famous.

Because there is only one picture that made it of the few that were supposedly taken according to the ranger, I lean towards that it was probably a lucky shot before he hopped in his truck and got the hell out of dodge before he started to smell like the muck that that Squatch was bathing in.

One thing I just enjoy hearing are responses like, Yea it's a clear picture and you can see everything perfectly but it can't be real bc the algae is too big and it's an action figure but definitely I think that the picture of the brown blob that you can't even see because it just a bunch of pixels is a Squatch for sure. I'm just like wtf? are you serious?

I guess I should have just asked, does anyone know the guy who took this picture, and if so, tell him to explain what this is because this picture could be a pretty good piece of evidence if it's real. That's me.

Pssh, an action figure, that's deep...

yeah this pic doesn't look real to me, also its go no neck, Its cool looking btw.
It also looks like its holding some luggage with its left hand

[edit on 22-5-2005 by bordnlazy]

im serious, just look at the surronding vegetation, doesnt the scale seem a bit off to you? I mean if bigfoot is 7 foot high and up................


Also why is the photo so cropped? If someone had this clear of a photo dont you think it would be bigger... blownup ?

Read the entire post Dulcimer, this picture was cropped down from the original. I have been looking for the original and for the love of sweet sexual satisfaction I can't find it, or the original website of which it was on. I still don't see how the picture isn't proportionate bc look at the sun shining on its shoulders, look at the shadow of the tree running behind him, the vegetation in front of him probably comes up to its knees as he is probably a fifth submerged in the swamp. Look closely at this picture, and if you have photoshop, enlarge it and look at the detail. You can almost smell his stink if you do these things. I seriously think that the proportions are right on. If you would like me to research swamp foliage to gather correct dimensions I will, just let me know.

Does it still look so fake? Or am I just crazy...

no, it wasn't on there, but a good link, full of pictures

That was the picture I saw first, nice find!! One thing I have to comment on is the fact that if this is a fake Picture and it isn't computer generated, making it an action figure. The fur on this action figure is very well placed and colored. The way it is matted to its arm in some parts, and in others it is still dry but noticeably greasy is an awesome special effect which I personally don't think one would remember to do while setting this up. I also mention the color because if itis fake, then the color of the fur should be darker and black, almost blue if the light shines on it giving it away. The reason it would be this way is because the dyes that are used to color action figures black, is actually a very dark blue, that is derived from indigo plants. I noticed in this picture that the color of the fur that is reflected from the sun is actually a brown, it is easily noticeable.

If this is a fake, then kudos to the creator for remembering such minute details that only a pro could remember. I ask this, nobody so farhas been able to give me a name of the person who submitted this picture, and another fact, why would anyone go to so much trouble on details and not have a name connected to their work. As this picture was obviously taken recently, the advances in technology have easily been seen in developing toys, but this is just a piece of work...

Call me gay if you want. But I use to be in arts and crafts (birdhouses and simulation scenes such as birds around a lake etc...). The material all seems way to familar for me not to say anything. This is definatley fake. The lake or so called river hes standing in looks like a resin I used to use to imitate legs. There also seems to me some crunched spanish moss on the resin river. lol . Oh man this cracks me up. As for bigfoot It seems like he was digitally added.

The vegetation seems to be blownup versions of twigs and they are too big. The bigfoot is of bad quality and the whole picture is not very good. I think it's fake.

At last, the breakthrough in sasquatch research that we have been waiting for.

I think the photographer was very fortunate to have come across this placid, photogenic example. But it is impossible to determine whether this is a genuine sasquatch without detailed inspection of the beast's distinguishing pedal extremities. Perhaps the photographer had to make haste when the sasquatch stopped wading and started bellowing and running, and therefore did not hold his ground to take a full length shot.

Nevertheless, let's see a picture of the feet, and we can form a better judgment.

(totally J/K).

Something has been blacked out around the left hand.

Originally posted by groingrinder
Something has been blacked out around the left hand.

maybe he was holding a top secret document (j/k)

just seems to be the way the shadow lands on the stump thing.