AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Aircraft Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


Pics : Downed F-117, downed F-16, damaged F-15, shot down Tomahawk in Kosovo


<<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>



reply posted on 1-6-2005 @ 11:38 PM by Stealth Spy



During the Gulf war, much to the Pentagon’s chagrin, F-117 Stealth light bombers were detected by the British and the Iraqis with antiquated radar systems. During the bombing of Kosovo, one F-117 was shot down by Yugoslav anti-aircraft with a Russian made missile of 1964 vintage.

A second F-117, though not downed, was severely damaged during the conflict.


From an American source : web.mit.edu...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-6-2005 @ 03:14 AM by waynos


But really, whats the big deal? one was downed and one was damaged in two separate conflicts? Thats pretty good going especially for a first generation design 25 years down the line, isn't it?

The official description of 'stealth' is 'Low Observability', not 'Complete Invisibility' or 'Magically Invulnerable' I think its a bit of a non story blown out of proportion actually.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-6-2005 @ 04:16 AM by Stealth Spy


Originally posted by waynos
But really, whats the big deal? one was downed and one was damaged in two separate conflicts?


Both were hit in the same Kosovo confilct.

Thats pretty good going especially for a first generation design 25 years down the line, isn't it?


The missile system that hit it was Russian 1960's tech. Imagine what their latest S-500(tested and to be deployed in late 2009) is capable of.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-6-2005 @ 04:23 AM by FredT


Originally posted by Stealth Spy
The missile system that hit it was Russian 1960's tech. Imagine what their latest S-500(tested and to be deployed in late 2009) is capable of.


And the F-117 is early 1970's technology. Imagine how the S-500 will fare against the F-22?? Besides, we have gone on ad nauseum about the conditions that enabled the Serbs (Im amazed they had the time to even fire off thier SAMS, what with all the atrocities they were busy commiting) to down the F-117



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 2-6-2005 @ 04:25 AM by waynos


Ah, I confused the Gulf War reference by scanning too quickly, however it still stands that one shot down and one damaged isn't exactly devastating.

Also the age of the missile doesn't change the fact that the definition of stealth is merely 'Low Observable', you know that means less visiible and more likely to survive, not 'invisible and bullet proof'. How much more obviously can I spell that out? The point of stealth is that fewer of your assets are destroyed in combat, it is not possible to guarantee that none of them are.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-6-2005 @ 11:11 AM by PsykoOps


Some of these post make it sound like it was some super SAM or AAA that shot down the F-117 in kosovo, but wasn't it infact plain aa-missiles fired in a bunch to a known position of the aircraft? I remember reading that someone was arrested for selling the information about the route, altitude and time of the F-117's in kosovo. Correct me if I'm wrong, makes more sense than the wilder theories of jammed bomb bay doors and such.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-6-2005 @ 12:08 PM by Stealth Spy


Double post edited

[edit on 2-6-2005 by Stealth Spy]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-6-2005 @ 12:10 PM by Stealth Spy


Originally posted by PsykoOps
Some of these post make it sound like it was some super SAM or AAA that shot down the F-117 in kosovo, but wasn't it infact plain aa-missiles fired in a bunch to a known position of the aircraft?



Pentagon officials confirmed that the aircraft was tracked by an unidentified radar and that two surface-to-air missile were fired at the F-117.


Russian Minister of Defense announced that the aircraft was brought down by a Russian-made SA-6 mobile SAM working in concert with a ground radar.




Link

Check out this thread : Yugoslavia's secret SAMs



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-6-2005 @ 01:31 PM by tomcat ha


Im totally sure that the F117 can be shot down relatively easily with modern missles. I can predrict a future without missles. Planes will be so stealthy that missles need to be soo sensitive that they will track birds instead of planes.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-6-2005 @ 02:13 PM by Stealth Spy


^^ I agree


Check out these threads too :

Stealth detection systems

This might not be far away from now (no offence intended) :


India's electron-accelerated pulse-power gigahertz microwave beam weapon : KALI

[edit on 2-6-2005 by Stealth Spy]



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 2-6-2005 @ 05:12 PM by waynos


Stealth spy, its ok you don't have to worry about causing offence with every pic you post That is just an impression of a potential future combat, likewise I wouldn't find a picture of the german plane shooting down a british one offensive. The reasdon I objected to the other one was because it had a very specific implication as I explained in my u2u. I will carry on disagreeing with you but carry on having your say



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 2-6-2005 @ 11:24 PM by M6D


dude, for some reason, this always sounds like propoganda trying to persuade us to support and join the russain or indian cause or somthing.....



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-6-2005 @ 03:02 AM by Corsarius


I read the link, but I don't think it meant a B-2. The following sentence after it referred to the previous incident and said "B-52". I don't think the US lost any 'buffalos' in that particular conflict though.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-6-2005 @ 03:26 AM by Figher Master FIN


Well, doesn't that prove that no aeroplane is unwinsible...



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 4-6-2005 @ 09:25 AM by waynos


Has anybody ever claimed that any aeroplane is 'unwinsible? I don't think they have.

ha ha, post edited because I spelled unwinsible wrong

[edit on 4-6-2005 by waynos]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 7-6-2005 @ 02:33 PM by TheRanchMan


A B-2 Getting Shot. HA! Thats almost as ludacris as the Yahfake, er, I mean, Yahweh, guy. HA!!



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 8-6-2005 @ 04:45 AM by Lucretius


Not ludicris at all.

You have to remember stealth is defined as "low observable" and not "invisible".

A B2 can be shot down just as easily as any other plane if it can be found... increasingly this is becoming possible



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-6-2005 @ 10:14 PM by Tony238


Originally posted by FredT
Originally posted by Stealth Spy
The missile system that hit it was Russian 1960's tech. Imagine what their latest S-500(tested and to be deployed in late 2009) is capable of.


And the F-117 is early 1970's technology. Imagine how the S-500 will fare against the F-22?? Besides, we have gone on ad nauseum about the conditions that enabled the Serbs (Im amazed they had the time to even fire off thier SAMS, what with all the atrocities they were busy commiting) to down the F-117

The F 117 is not early 70's technology it was mid 80's tech. The first supposed stealth aircraft was the F 19A Frisbee.





   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-6-2005 @ 05:53 AM by waynos



The F 117 is not early 70's technology it was mid 80's tech. The first supposed stealth aircraft was the F 19A Frisbee.




Jaysus wept! The fictional 'F-19' now has a subtype and a name

This is getting more like the UFO board every day

[edit on 9-6-2005 by waynos]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-6-2005 @ 11:41 PM by Zaphod58


Actually I was reading a webpage the other day and they claim that they confirmed TWO B2s were definately shot down, and a third was hit, and crashed into a mountain, but they couldn't find the wreckage. Now what makes this really impressive is that this supposedly happened in 1999, but I saw one of the ones that was "shot down" do a flyby last year at a NASCAR race, low enough that the cameras could show the name and tail number on the gear doors.



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>





























































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.098 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.