This topic is in the Political Ideology discussion forum.  (rss)


Dirty Dems tricks in Washington State




Topic started on 19-5-2005 @ 12:38 PM by Maud Dib


And they say Republicans cheat?

More and more reports are emerging of the extent to which Democrats were willing to go to try to influence the 2004 election.
>
>Well, their tactics worked in Washington State.
>
>Our Republican candidate for Governor, Dino Rossi, actually won the election. Then he won the recount.
>
> Then Democrat-controlled King County "found" 566 new votes just in time for the second recount, enough to overturn the results of Election Day and the first recount.
>
> The new result? Dino Rossi "lost" by 129 votes. But consider the following facts in Washington state:
> - 943 felons illegally voted
> - 49 dead people vote d
> - 3 people voted in Washington and another state
> - 2 illegal aliens voted
> - 12 people voted multiple times
> - 174 provisional votes were counted but later found to be cast people who had already voted or were unregistered
>
>Also at least another 1,600 ballots are still in question:
>
> - 875 more absentee votes were cast in King County than there were absentee voters
> - 95 more ballots in King County and 50 ballots in Whitman County were "found" after both recounts, and have never been counted
> - At least 660 provisional ballots were improperly counted in King County.

I dont know about you all but I'm tired of getting bashed around by folks saying that Republicans are cheaters, why hasnt the mainstream media reported any of this? My lord when there was a question about Florida all we heard was "They Cheated" all day every day for four years



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 19-5-2005 @ 02:00 PM by ZeddicusZulZorander


Yeah, the Democrat candidate was like "Sorry, I won't accept this...try again." After the second count "Nope, try again." Finally after finding some mysterious votes "I win, I win..."

The bummer is that Washington taxpayers have to foot the bill for the very costly recounts. They cheat and the public pays.

You're right, the media and the Democrats are trying to push this under the rug...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 20-5-2005 @ 01:36 PM by I_AM_that_I_AM



Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
Yeah, the Democrat candidate was like "Sorry, I won't accept this...try again." After the second count "Nope, try again." Finally after finding some mysterious votes "I win, I win..."

The bummer is that Washington taxpayers have to foot the bill for the very costly recounts. They cheat and the public pays.

You're right, the media and the Democrats are trying to push this under the rug...


Actually, the Democratic party and NOT the voters had to pay for the last recount.

ANd if the R's AND D's positions had been reversed, would you explect them NOT to recount?
The vote was so very close I can see either party wanting multiple recounts.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-7-2005 @ 09:46 PM by JBurns


How was that vote close at all? It's quite evident that there was a decent amount of bogus votes there...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 



























ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.030 seconds
Page processed in 0.109 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread