It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AceOfBase
BTW, do you have per state figure on gun ownership in the US?
The best I could find was a survey from 1996 on regional ownership.
It looks like gun ownership is lower in the North East than it is in the South and I think crime is lower in the New England than it is in the South.
If anyone has better regional gun ownership data please post it.
Originally posted by Badger
I find it quite bizarre that some people are still clinging to the belief that introducing more lethal weapons into a society can have any other impact than increasing the possibility that said weapons will be used.
You can pull statistics out of your backside all you like, but the basic premise is rather simple.
Originally posted by Badger
More cars on the roads- more road traffic accidents
More planes in the sky- more airplane disasters
More people take up surfing- more people drown in the surf
More people have access to firearms- more people end up dead as a result
Originally posted by Badger
Sure Switzerland has a lot of guns and a low homicide rate, big deal. That's an argument for Swiss society, not an argument for more access to firearms. If gun crime in the UK is increasing can anyone with even a modicum of common sense seriously argue that the way to address the issue is to introduce an even greater number of firearms?!
Originally posted by Badger
Having personal knowledge of law enforcement in the UK I can assure you that you can forget your Hollywood BS about defending yourself with a concealed weapon if someone tries to assualt or rob you in the street. Anyone doing so with the intent to use the firearm they are pointing at you will shoot you dead before you can draw your concealed weapon. Anyone who doesn't never had it in them to do so in the first place.
Originally posted by Badger
So is a firearm useful for defending your property and family during a burglary for example? Well I guess this might be the one area where there may be something in this gun ownership idea. But in my opinion it isn't much. If you disturb an intruder they are FAR more likely to flee the property than confront you. There is a simple logic to that, they don't want to be apprehended or injured, and they generally don't want to be facing a more serious charge.
Originally posted by Badger
Gun control in a society that isn't already flooded with guns does work. The rise in firearms offences in the Uk has been significant,but really only when you compare it with a rather low starting point, and a significant proportion of these offences don't actually involve "firearms" at all but often replica weapons, which are often included in the overall statistics, and in my opinion cause a false representation of the real situation.
LONDON -- The British government has ordered the army onto the streets to join an all-out summer campaign against anti-social drunken and violent behavior by rowdy youths.
Originally posted by Fry2
Something I came across seems somewhat relative to this discussion;
LONDON -- The British government has ordered the army onto the streets to join an all-out summer campaign against anti-social drunken and violent behavior by rowdy youths.
LINK
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
The gun ban is a resounding success. Next on the list is a knife ban and replica guns and who knows what else:
Knife Crime Google Search
Doctors' kitchen knives ban call
Replica Gun Ban
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Well if you're all unarmed sheep being led to the NWO slaughterhouse, I'd say it's working...
Originally posted by Odium
It's simple to understand really.
If the ban was working. Gun crime would not be going up. It would be going down. Would it not?
In America it is easier to get a hold of a gun, so people will be shot instead of being stabbed like they are in the U.K.
Yet Finland has shown gun bans not working. Switzerland has shown gun ownership can work perfectly and easily enough.
Switzerland is roughly 656miles from the U.K.
America is roughly 3510miles from the U.K.
We share a lot more in common with Europe then people wish to believe.
Or I can start using Africa or Asia or the Middle East to display how a gun ban doesn't work? Enough innocent people been killed through their lack of ability to own a firearm.
Look at Europe and the only nation which used a similar gun ban to ours and then had to remove it.
Everybody in the UK stands the tinniest chance of being a victim of gun crime. That is the proof of how the ban works.
Originally posted by Fry2
Yet, you even admit that those chances are constantly increasing!
If anything, I think it would give the potential violent criminal one more reason NOT to commit the crime in the first place.
Originally posted by edsinger
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Well if you're all unarmed sheep being led to the NWO slaughterhouse, I'd say it's working...
Spot on......
Originally posted by Winchester Ranger T
An unarmed Britain is probably a good thing however, with the decreasing standards of social behaviour there. Britain just doesn't have the social standards of somewhere like Switzerland where firearms ownership is practically uniform.