It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Iran manufactures F-14 engine parts

page: 4
0
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 24 2005 @ 08:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by persian
new pictures of iranian F14s.


- Interesting and yes they do indeed look in good shape.
Amazingly so considering the supposed decades old US arms embargo, hmmmm?

I do hope, if - God forbid - it ever comes to it, that the families of any American (or others') crews maimed or injured by them (or any of the rest of their US sourced and maintained AF) remember to thank those involved in 'Iran-gate' and any other little scams supplying the necessary for them.

Especially the staggeringly forgetful 'St' Reagan and the traitors Ollie North and Poindexter.




posted on May, 24 2005 @ 08:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by aerospaceweb
I concur. Afghanistan never had and F-4, F-5, or F-14 aircraft.


- I wasn't so sure about the F5 - but only cos so many were sold all over the place and so many were in Vietman at the time of the collapse, I thought there might have been a possibility they bought some on the open market, even if it seemed unlikely.

But yes thanks for confirming this, I'm absolutely certain Phantoms and Tomcats have definitely never been in the Afghan AF.


Sep

posted on May, 24 2005 @ 08:56 AM
link   
The Afghan airforce operated Russian aircrafts. these included Mig-21, Su-7, Su-20, Su-22, and Il-39

[edit on 24-5-2005 by Sep]



posted on May, 25 2005 @ 04:09 PM
link   
Hi Folks,

I am new to this forum, and glad to be here. Highly interesting discussions indeed....

On the subject of Iranian Tomcat drivers, I have a suggestion to those who have doubts. Have you spoken to any *by now old timer) USAF or other American instructors who taught IIAF pilots? I have. Just listen to them and you will see that they were up there with the best. You need to keep in mind that these folks were separate from the current government, and for the most part were very pro American. For this, they suffered more from their own government than from the Iraqi Air Force.

Regarding Tom Cooper, maybe one reason other sources don't agree with him is that they have not done as extensive research as he has. If you go to his website and read his books, you will see that he is not shy about disclosing Iranian failures and bad days as well. For most of the incidents he shows, he has dates, evidence in the form of corroborative narratives with pilot and ground personnel from both sides, photographs, gun camera images, FOIA documents of the USAF and USN, you name it. He also admits that this is work under progress, and keep in mind he has been doing this for 18 years. Can anyone show me any "western military expert" in Flight international or elsewhere who has even come close to this level of study? Who has even bothered to talk to any Iranian and Iraqi pilots who were there? At least for this, he deserves credit and a listen.

Some of the ex-IIAF guys who flew in this war are here in the US, even some who got Phoenix kills. Instead of knocking them, we need to realize that these people were our friends and they fought for their country, not a bunch of mullahs. Many of them were either killed by or ran away from the mullahs after they were not needed anymore. This may be hard for you to believe, but it is true. Iranians are different than Saudis and Kuwaitis. I would like to see how many Saudi F-15's would be flying 25 years from now if the US pulled out tomorrow. Whereas about 1/2 of the Tomcats in Iran's original inventory are flyable today. (They had them for only 4 years before the revolution) Even if they had good relations with the US and free access to spare parts that would still be an accomplishment IMHO.

Also, I don't mean to knock USN Tomcat drivers, but I think it is fair to say that in 8 years war with Iraq, Iranian Tomcat drivers had many more real world (and more challenging) combat experiences with the Iraqis than the two times that USN Tomcats encounetered an equal number of Libyan adversaries of much lower quality. In fact, the comabt debut of the Tomcat was in Iranian, not USN service.

Keep in mind that the first Gulf war went on for 8 years, and had Iran not had capable people behind its planes, it could not have sustained oil exports and commercial air traffic for 8 years against an enemy 6 times its size which enjoyed all kinds of help, whether it be technical, financial, or intelligence. Also, you will be hard pressed to find air warfare on this scale for such a long period of time in any time or place after the Vietnam war. As an example, this war was also the combat debut for the Mig-25, and the Tomcat fared very well against the Mig-25, sufferring no losses while destroying several, some at a long range with the Phoenix (the whole reason Iran bought the Tomcat to begin with!). One Mig-25 was shot down by an F-5E with guns in a close quarters dogfight. This F-5E was piloted by an ex-IIAF top gun who flew in their acrojet team alongside the Blue Angels. He survived the war and is in the US today.

Maybe the Tomcats and Iran's dilapidated fleet are no threat to the US or anybody today, but all indications are that in the early 80's, they were quite a bunch who kicked some serious butt. They were our friends, and they have my respect.

Thanks,

Herman



posted on May, 26 2005 @ 12:58 AM
link   
The F-14 is an antique. If it was a car it would of had antique license plates on it 10 years ago.
The engines are TF-30's designed from the JT8D from Pratt and Whitney's base model in the 1950's.
They want to waste their time and money making an engine that requires constant maitenenance...hey go for it. Absolutely no electronis on it.
Ancient firecontrol systems that didn't work right when they where new. Just a 50's style hydro mechanical low-mid by-pass fan. I used to work on them in 1978, so I guess I know a little about them to make that statement.
It's a dinosaur.

[edit on 26-5-2005 by 4thHorseman]



posted on May, 26 2005 @ 06:56 PM
link   
They still lack the ability to manufacture the finicky compressor blades for the engines. Without that ability, they would have to canabalize from the others. Perhaps that explains why so few of them are still in flying condition.

Those that were are probably treated very carefully while in flight. Wouldn't want to deal with a disintegrating engine in flight, would you?



posted on May, 26 2005 @ 08:24 PM
link   
Iran has probably replaced the orignal engines with turbofans from Russia. At least that's what a number of credible sources have suggested. However, I haven't seen anything saying what particular Russian engine model might have been installed.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join