It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Codycougar91
Also, if someone says that this war wasnt justifyable, wat do you base that off of?
yeah i am pretty much pro war!
The rhythm and meter need work.
Originally posted by WeBDeviL
Like I said, we will never agree.
Although, as a foot-note, I think you should be grateful for that cozy house/apartment/etc. and that nice computer and all your blessings, and remember, while we have men and women out there sacrificing so that you don't have to, you go ahead and criticize them.
Once again, "you're welcome"
-wD
Originally posted by PeaceBeWithYou
Are there still people around that actually support this war?
Why? Is anyone able to articulate a reasonable argument in favor of this war?
Most of the voices on the right are too indoctrinated in military-like quasi-sacred obedience to authority to question even turds like Bush and the PNAC whenever it happens to be them in the driver's seat. George W. Bush the president? He's the opposite of "presidential" (whatever that means) and has yet to be elected in a fair election!
Nonetheless, this is at least a pretend democracy--not the military. In a democracy it is important to keep your leaders in check because power corrupts, which could lead to a pretend democracy. To simply continue to unquestioningly swallow the manipulative discharge of the Bush regime is not the democratic equivalent of following orders. It is a recipe for the death of democracy.
If you are an American millionaire watching his bank account, I can understand your support for the war: murderous levels of greed. Pillaging is good for business.
What I don't understand is closer-to-average Joe America that continues to preach the support of this regime.
If that's you, please, before clicking reply, just question authority. Just one time, please, try to understand "liberal" arguments. Do some research. Its okay if you come to regret your viewpoints, you can change them. Everyone would prefer the troops at home with their families than in depleted uranium-ville... do it for the troops, and for their children.
There are those that tell anyone opposed to the war to move to France. Well, I did move to France. To those that would now send my brave friends--who signed up in the US military to defend our soil and our people--to Irak to do their bidding , I ask out of fairness that you go to Baghdad yourselves.
Originally posted by devilwasp
So its ok to kill, mame and basically steal to ensure our survival which inevitabley will kill us anyhow.
Originally posted by the_oleneo
Again, I stated this to you: I don't think you truly grasp the reality of every economy around the world is entirely dependent on oil.
In addition, right down to the marco-economic level. Your life.
Such are the ways of the human civilization.
[edit on 5/19/2005 by the_oleneo]
Originally posted by devilwasp
With respect , its not england its the UK.
Also we were hardly in a position to start another war.
Thirdly if we did things might have been diffrent but we were more concered about a certian red menace in the east than a small german anoyance.
Originally posted by cmdrpaddy
You are willing to kill people so you can drive around in your car and kill the planet, slowly, but surely?
Originally posted by cmdrpaddy
This is sick, how can anyone morally justify a war because they want cheap oil? I would prefer to live without oil than kill people purely for the continuation of an unsustainable way of life.
Originally posted by the_oleneo
People here just needed to look at the big picture instead of coming up with the same weak-a**ed PC arguments on how wrong and horrible the war is: www.silverbearcafe.com...
T
The upcoming war in Iraq is mostly about how the ruling class at Langley and the Bush/Cheney administration view hydrocarbons at the geo-strategic level, and the overarching macroeconomic threats to the U.S. dollar from the euro. T
Unfortunately, neo-conservatives such as George Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle fail to grasp that Newton's Law applies equally to both physics and the geo-political sphere as well: "For every action there is an equal but opposite reaction."
However, in both the pre and post 9/11 intervals, the `America first' policies of the Bush administration, with its unwillingness to honor International Treaties, along with their aggressive militarisation of foreign policy, has significantly damaged our reputation abroad. Following 9/11, it appears that President Bush's `warmongering rhetoric' has created global tensions -- as we are now viewed as a belligerent superpower willing to apply unilateral military force without U.N. approval. Moreover, this administrations failure to actively engage in negotiations regarding the Israeli/Palestinian conflict is unfortunate.
Facing these potentialities, I hypothesize that President Bush intends to topple Saddam in 2003 in a pre-emptive attempt to initiate massive Iraqi oil production in far excess of OPEC quotas, to reduce global oil prices, and thereby dismantle OPEC's price controls. The end-goal of the neo-conservatives is incredibly bold yet simple in purpose, to use the `war on terror' as the premise to finally dissolve OPEC's decision-making process, thus ultimately preventing the cartel's inevitable switch to pricing oil in euros.
This war will be over the global currency of oil. A war intended to prevent oil from being priced in euros.
Paradoxically, this administration's belligerent policies may bring about the very outcome they hope to prevent -- an OPEC currency switch to euros. Informed patriots realize that militant imperialist over-reach is not only detrimental to our international status, but may also in turn create severe damage to our economic stability. Thus, remaining silent is not only misguided, but false patriotism. We must not stand silent and watch our country become a `rogue' superpower, relying on brute force, thereby forcing the developed nations or OPEC to abandon the dollar standard -- and with the mere stroke of a pen -- slay the U.S. Empire.