It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by boogyman
[I think you'll find that the reason why many of the people are against the Iraq war is precisely the reason you mention. Im sorry but I do not support the machinations of those intent on the exploitation of the regular guy in order to make a quick buck.
Originally posted by devilwasp
the_oleneo,
So its ok to kill to save yourselfs?
To slaughter millions so that you can have oil?
I don't think you truly grasp the reality of every economy around the world is entirely dependent on oil.
Originally posted by MickeyDee
I don't think you truly grasp the reality of every economy around the world is entirely dependent on oil.
This is a very good point.
Many people believe a war for oil is bad, but when the whole world depends on it, is a war for oil such a bad thing???
Originally posted by MickeyDee
I don't think you truly grasp the reality of every economy around the world is entirely dependent on oil.
This is a very good point.
Many people believe a war for oil is bad, but when the whole world depends on it, is a war for oil such a bad thing???
Originally posted by the_oleneo
I don't think you truly grasp the reality of every economy around the world is entirely dependent on oil.
For example:
An artist in India have crafted beautiful vases, earned international recognition for artistry and beauty of crafting vases. In North America and Europe, people would like to buy his vases for their homes. Nowadays, you can access to that artist's website in India, pick, order and ship the vase to you. How would the vase get to you?
On horseback traveling through China, Russia, then ferry across the Bering Strait to Alaska and then onward to your home to delivery a lovely vase in 2-3 months?
And just how you get or earn the money to buy the vase? You hit up your Mom for money?
[edit on 5/18/2005 by the_oleneo]
Originally posted by koji_K
It is when we are dependent on oil by choice. I'm not talking about alternate forms of energy even, just simple changes like tighter engine efficiency standards in the US would make a huge difference, but the oil companies have too many politicians in their pocket for that to happen. So we fight wars instead.
I propose a $2 tax on gas. The resulting money (and I have a feeling there will be a lot) should be allocated to a universal free medical care.
Originally posted by MickeyDee
In the UK we pay that on petrol(gas) and we do have free medical care but our country is still a shambles!!!
Originally posted by MickeyDee
I propose a $2 tax on gas. The resulting money (and I have a feeling there will be a lot) should be allocated to a universal free medical care.
In the UK we pay that on petrol(gas) and we do have free medical care but our country is still a shambles!!!
Originally posted by WeBDeviL
Well, quite frankly, yes. I am saying that. Are you saying that you had no problem with him murdering over 500,000 Iraqis and injuring in some way more than 1,000,000?
That was his basis for his government. Fear. That is wrong, and the people (I don't know if you remember but this but the Iraqi population isn't totally against the U.S. occupation), needed to be freed. No doubt about that. So, yes, to your question.
Secondly, the WMDs were still active. Like I said, these troops found them in Northern Iraq. Stashed away in a bunker. Chemicals of all kinds - mustard gas, etc.
Sadly, in this occupation, like I said, from a military standpoint, some things have gone wrong. The deaths of the innocent can't be avoided in war though, and anyone who thinks this can be done is simply living in ignorance.
[/qupte]
I expect casualties in war, that is not my issue here. My issue is the war and the reasons behind it itself.
Like Rasputin said, history will prove that this was the right thing to do. Look at the democratic and FREEDOM revolutions occuring already. The trend is spreading, no doubt about that.
No history will look back and say it was yet again ANOTHER war, the lasting things are made in peace not war. Did vietnam do anything ? No.
Did versailles cause anything good?
No.
We had no right to go in and tell them how to live, we have no right to dictate what is right or wrong in there land.
Originally posted by WeBDeviL
Your point on the wars of history is moot. Did World War Two do anything? Yes. Did the Gulf War (1) do anything? Yes.
Your point, like I said, is moot.
Now then, I agree that it is not your place to say what is right and wrong in a country you know nothing about. Yet you assume that I know nothing about it myself.
Let me tell you, as you may or may not know, I did serve in the military, (for quite a long time, I might add). With that being said, let me tell you also that I served in the first Gulf War, and I may even be called up to serve in this current conflict. I've had buddies call me from Iraq and PERSONALLY tell me that those weapons are there.
First hand experience from soldier's fighting there. Ya know something else they've told me? They've told me that they've encountered NUMEROUS Iraqis who can't thank them enough. That in itself, my friend, is enough to convince me.
I've seen this stuff myself. I doubt you have.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
I have always supported and still support the War in Iraq.
I supported the war because Saddam was in violation of the cease fire agreement with the U.S. and allies from the original Gulf war as well as all later UN Security Council resolutions. I also supported it because I thought it would be good long-term for the Iraqi people and the region in general.
Oh I forgot to mention Saddam was also firing on U.S. and British planes monitoring the no-fly zone under UN mandate.
[edit on 5/17/2005 by djohnsto77]
Originally posted by WeBDeviL
First of all, yes. I do know that WW2 was a direct result of WW1.
Secondly, you ask why the media doesn't cover it? Well, they did. Now they don't because nothing has been found since.
Also, do you not know the media's heavily biased slant to the left? That's also a fact, thank you.
They show it, but it is twisted in a left-agenda kind of way.
Finally, the men and women I've talked to have not "killed hundreds". Your stance on this whole subject is, "I don't know them, so I won't help." - in a nutshell.
From your stating of it isn't your land, so you can't say anything, yet you are against the war?
Or to your stating that you would not help them because it killed some others.
We agree to disagree, as we will never see eye to eye. However, I will leave you with two final thoughts:
1) I've seen freedom ring and people cheer because of it. Yes, I have killed. Am I proud of it? Not at all. A necessary evil, like your quote states. Yet, those who I killed (who wanted to kill us because they wanted to keep power), helped me, and MY COUNTRY, free thousands upon thousands upon thousands of men, women, and children. It helped me bring to justice a man that killed hundreds of thousands and hurt millions.
2) I leave you with a quote, regarding your stance on not helping because you don't know the land, etc.:
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmond Burke
[/qoute]
Might I also add that winston churchil made a similar statement to this about appeasement in 1930's.
Sometimes acting is necessary, but acting under a lie and acting to kill one man.....is not necessary.
3) Actually, I'll add a third. "Your welcome."
Right then...
[edit on 26/02/2005 by devilwasp]
[edit on 26/02/2005 by devilwasp]
Many people believe a war for oil is bad, but when the whole world depends on it, is a war for oil such a bad thing???
Originally posted by Codycougar91
I agree. To add to this, Saddam was an EVIL dictator who tortured thousands of people. Also, if someone says that this war wasnt justifyable, wat do you base that off of?