It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LazarusTheLong
but then, since they can't hear anything from the outside world, maybe they think we are all cannibalistic monsters that thier great leader protects them from (as one of his nice propaganda posters states)
Originally posted by LazarusTheLong
how would we react if mexico started building nukes? then started "asking" for money and food...
we do not negotiate with terrorists, so would we just let it go?
or get pissed?
I say, let the people starve until they march up the door of Kims palace and take the country back for themselves...
a man with nothing to loose, is the most dangerous of all...
and I hope his people realize they have 2 choices... die by starvation, or maybe die of gunshots while exercising a revolt.
It makes sense to me...
but then, since they can't hear anything from the outside world, maybe they think we are all cannibalistic monsters that thier great leader protects them from (as one of his nice propaganda posters states)
Originally posted by ROMAD
Originally posted by LazarusTheLong
I say, let the people starve until they march up the door of Kims palace and take the country back for themselves...
and I hope his people realize they have 2 choices... die by starvation, or
OKAYYY...
What about this: Give us the nukes and we give you some food. I bunch of chickens for one nuclear component. Heck, by the time we get done he will be fat and we will be happy.
Originally posted by subz
Kim Jong Ill does not care either way whether his "subjects" starve to death. The decision is ours: do we allow millions of North Koreans to die because of the actions of one man? Or do we act with humanity and feed the starving North Koreans?
Either option will have a recalcitrant Kim Jong Ill in power in North Korea. I say we help prevent massive suffering.
[edit on 17/5/05 by subz]
Originally posted by LazarusTheLong but it all goes back to the addage, teach a man to build a nuke to trade for fish, or just teach him to fish...
which is better?