It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gooseuk
This got me thinking, I have heard much about the the Raptor and its assocated supercruise ability, my point is, will there be an offensive limitation on the Raptor while in Supercruise mode? AKA is the Raptor helpless while still in super cruise? Due to the fact that the Raptor would have to open the aircrafts payload doors INTO the slip stream, there by having its doors ripped in the related slipstream of the aircraft at supercruise.
Originally posted by gooseuk
You are quite correct, that I would settle my views once I see a picture, its really that simple, I know the physics of problem, so if they have solved it, GRAND, then show me proof, rather than a few paragraphs from the AF PR department, without pictures etc.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Gooseuk, Chemapeich, and others who keep disagreeing with what is being presented to your obvious not liking, please provide sourcings to the contrary.
There have been a sufficient number of links given in this topic refuting what you and others are seemingly still trying to refute, and yet, none of you have produced anything resembling source information to the contrary.
I have asked this before, this is the second request.
Interesting, no?
seekerof
Originally posted by Stealth Spy
Will anyone answer the questions i posted.
BTW : I have read somewhere that the PAK-FA's weapons bay will have sliding doors(unlike the raptor's downwardly opening ones).
The PAK-FA (prototype in late 2006)
img223.exs.cx...
Originally posted by gooseuk
I have yet to see an air to air shot of the Raptor at mach with the doors open or for that matter an air to air shot of the Raptor in any "odd" configuation postions, aka upside down and launching a missile.
Originally posted by longbow
To the manuvrability issue - aka F-22 VS Su-37 dogfight - it still amazes me that people consider F-22 to be not mauvrable, while in fact the design was chosen because it was more manuvrable than F-23. And why are you overlooking the fact the F-22 is able to make 60 degrees AoA in sustained flight (only one today), that it has the lowest wing loading ratio from all todays planes (including russian) and highest thrust to weight. Besides look at todays short range AA misilles they are able to make 70-100Gs and the seekers cover the whole forward hemisphere- do you think any plane has any chance to outmanuvre them?