Bohemian Grove, The Owl: Not Satanic!

reply to post by Masonic Light


I "LOL'd" at that picture, apologies to what ever dyslexic dysgraphic person drew that.
(no offense to either, im disgraphic and went to a school that focued on dyslexia)

lol impossible? you must have been mistaken, count again, the feathers.

Originally posted by santjime
I "LOL'd" at that picture, apologies to what ever dyslexic dysgraphic person drew that.
(no offense to either, im disgraphic and went to a school that focued on dyslexia)

No, it's not dyslexic. If you spell "Mason" correctly, that's the drawing you get, not a hexagram.

lol impossible? that is an outright lie.

What is an outright lie?

reply to post by Masonic Light


Im sorry i edited it, i put mistake* my apologies.

Count the feathers again, i can assure there are 32 and 33.

And yes that is ONE way to spell out mason, but by putting two trangles over the pyramid also does the trick.

Originally posted by santjime

Im sorry i edited it, i put mistake* my apologies.

Count the feathers again, i can assure there are 32 and 33.

I'm still getting 17 on both sides.

And yes that is ONE way to spell out mason, but by putting two trangles over the pyramid also does the trick.

If you put the two triangles over it, it spells "Asmon", not "Mason".

reply to post by Masonic Light


I see where your getting 17 from. . . your only counting the outter layer of feather. you see behind the 17 that u count. are MORE feathers, here is a picture, so you can see more clear what im referring too
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/ae4c4a8dd6a7.png[/atsimg]

reply to post by santjime


Ok, but I re-counted and got 34 on both sides (which is double 17).

reply to post by santjime


I get 33 on both sides. Are you counting all of them?

Originally posted by santjime
Please Just Try To Entertain The Thought, Just For A Minute
-the thought of freemasonrys presence on the dollar bill

I did. Then Iooked at the evidence.

Ok and with this I rest my case, because we are going nowhere. But my evidence clearly points to one thing. Freemasonry's presence in the dollar bill.

This is the problem. You're only looking at "your" evidence, as opposed to the evidence. Anything that points in the other direction is some complicated Masonic psyop I don't quite understand.

But if you infact get a a magnifying glass and do it yourself, like i had asked yall too, it is clearly an owl.

I did look at a dollar bill under a magnifying glass. To be honest, I didn't see the spider until I did that. From far off, I'm with you on "owl", and I give it about as much credence as cloud likeness.

Yes the spiderweb and the spier make sense, it is simply not a spider.

Why?

What i meant to say was that. Im 18, if i Apply for my apprenticeship and get it. It is very realistic that I would be honored enough to be requested to become a 33rd in years to come.

That's still pretty high praise for yourself.

reply to post by Masonic Light


Thats because you counted the giant overlay of feathers. Count just the small individual feathers.

Originally posted by santjime
reply to post by Masonic Light

 

And yes that is ONE way to spell out mason, but by putting two trangles over the pyramid also does the trick.

If you're willing to ignore the actual shape of the pyramid and rearrange the letters.

Originally posted by santjime
reply to post by Masonic Light

 

Thats because you counted the giant overlay of feathers. Count just the small individual feathers.

Seems like, as with everything else in this theory, you have to "look deeper" with one element and not look at all at another.

reply to post by AugustusMasonicus

Thank you Augustus, So you can see that i was not making it up. . . .
I may have miscounted on the dollar bill. But I am most certain on the dollar bill the right wing has 32 and the left 33.
And yes on the photo above they are both 33, But it is still 33 feathers, and that design came after 1782.

Originally posted by santjime

Thats because you counted the giant overlay of feathers. Count just the small individual feathers.

In that case I get 33 on each side. However, I also should point out this:

The number of feathers in the tail and wings are not specified in the official 1782 description of the Great Seal. Neither are the number of olives or leaves. These details are determined by artists and engravers. They have no intended symbolic significance.

Link

That being the case, one will be able to find all sorts of different numbers, depending on who drew it.

Originally posted by santjime
And yes on the photo above they are both 33, But it is still 33 feathers, and that design came after 1782.

An 1885 committee designed that one. None of that committee were Masons.

reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread140710/pg13#pid11001353]post by OnTheLevel213[/url

 

BUT WAIT? I Thought it was designed in 1782?!!
thats almost a hundred years after it was designed? Your not being consistent.

First it dosnt matter if it was 33 feathers because it was designed before Scottish rite, now you say it was designed 100 years after the original design.
Do you not see your inconsistency of what you say? And your lack of knowledge about what you claim you know.