I recently read this in the "Sunday Times Magazine". It seems that the rock everyone thinks looks like a face appears to be a "worn
geological formation" when magnified. Or maybe it was a face originally but has just been eroded away?.................
If your interested, there is allready an ATS thread here on the Martian 'face'.
And Hoagland's not the only guy talking about this, and certainley is more than just a figment of his imagination(artificial or not). Read
the thread for some good links and photos.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.