It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mexico's Fox toughens talk on U.S. immigration law
Reuters
Friday, May 13, 2005; 11:29 PM
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Mexican President Vicente Fox called recent U.S. measures to stem illegal immigration a step back for bilateral relations on Friday and said Mexican migrants do jobs "that not even blacks want to do."
In comments likely to raise the temperature of the immigration debate, Fox defended the role of undocumented Mexican workers in the United States to a group of Texas business people meeting in Mexico.
"There is no doubt that Mexicans, filled with dignity, willingness and ability to work are doing jobs that not even blacks want to do there in the United States," he said in a speech broadcast in part on local radio and reported on newspaper web sites.
Originally posted by I See You
Here we go again. The media jumps in and starts making accusations for a reaction from the people to escalade this into a racial escapade.
Media: Hey lets run with this story it will make a good one then we can run another story on how racism effects american workers.
We fall for this crap and people get offended because they make it out this way. The black american community should not be offended by this knowing that they media is trying to offend them on purpose. I doubt Vvincent Fox remarks were meant to offend you. He was stating the facts.
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
I don't see anything wrong with President Fox's speech. If the truth offends you, well, that's the way it goes.
Traditionally, the "out" groups were the ones who took menial jobs, since many other jobs were denied to them, either because of education or simply racial prejudice. Regardless of reason, up until about 20-30 years ago, the menial jobs in the United States were disproportionally held by African Americans, many of whom couldn't get other jobs.
Things have changed now (in a way forseen by the late Democratic senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan); for a wide variety of reasons, many African Anericans won't work these jobs any more and the ilegales, overwhelmingly Mexican and Central Americans, are doing those same jobs.
The superficiality of your comment surprises me...seeing as you have all those ats points I would expect more insight! But I digress.
The role of legal immigration in this country has a long and treasured history, the facts of which I'm sure you are aware. However the nature and effects of "illegal immigration" on this country is something much different.
I wonder what "jobs" you are speaking about when you infere [sic] that americans (black-brown or white) won't take them. Are they the jobs at Mc donalds? The summer jobs mowing lawns that teenagers used to do? Just exactly what jobs are you refering [sic] to?
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
cafeman says:
The superficiality of your comment surprises me...seeing as you have all those ats points I would expect more insight! But I digress.
Well, I guess even someone who posts a lot isn't necessarily smart or politically correct enough to live up to your expectations. I'll try to do better next time.
The role of legal immigration in this country has a long and treasured history, the facts of which I'm sure you are aware. However the nature and effects of "illegal immigration" on this country is something much different.
I suppose so. The nature of illegal immigration is that its illegal, which creates a criminal class, from the coyotes who smuggle them to the businesses which hire them.
The effects? Well, certainly there're more immoigrants than there'd be if they were legal; the latter would entail quotas, certainly.
So the result of unbridled illegal immigration is that we now have more Spanish-speaking brown guys in the country, working more menial jobs, using up more American goods and services, sending more money out of the country, and doing more stuff. You could argue over whether the value that these people bring in their work is outweighed by their use of our welfare infrastructure, but than's a different conversation.
I wonder what "jobs" you are speaking about when you infere [sic] that americans (black-brown or white) won't take them. Are they the jobs at Mc donalds? The summer jobs mowing lawns that teenagers used to do? Just exactly what jobs are you refering [sic] to?
Yes, cafeman, those all seem to be good examples. That, plus the construction industry here in Arizona, which has somewhat tempered the incredible rise in the cost of housing (but not by much); the landscape business; the hospitality business; and some aspects of the healthcare business, especially the semi-skilled eldercare people who take care of grandma for $6.25 an hour.
Originally posted by Frosty
This could very well be the situation that buys the US the amount of time it needs to push for this new 'Great Wall' bill. Unfortunately, because Fox is not white, this will more than likely not be taken as a racist comment but as some sort of gesture of truth. In the end, the dirty bastards seem to have full immunity from these remarks.
Of course, his remarks are true: blacks are just too damn lazy.
Surely you're not telling me that Americans will not take jobs in the areas you have listed above...are you?
Americans of all races creeds and Color do indeed labor in all of the above listed categories of work, and having illegal immigrants take these jobs, even takes jobs away from high school kids simply trying to earn a buck for college or a summer sports camp....
In any event, I know for a fact that Americans do indeed take these jobs...even in Arizona....yes even Sedona...where I used to live!
Thats my point, so why in the world would we even be discussing the appropriateness of Vincente Fox's comment at all? It's basically a straw man argument/discussion...illegal immigrants are here illegally...so who cares if they will do the work of 20 slaves, horses, men or tractors....they are illegal and should be sent back to Mr. Fox....period!
...I call it as I see it, and try to base it on facts....
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
cafeman says:
Surely you're not telling me that Americans will not take jobs in the areas you have listed above...are you?
You tell me, bud.
Most of the minimum-wage jobs I see, like landscaping, Mickey Dee, maids in hotels, and busboys/dishwashers in restaurants are held by Latinos; the fact that many of them cannot speak a word of English tells me that most of them are recent immigrants, and basic demographics tells me that most of them are ilegales.
Given that, why would an employer deliberately discriminate against American citizens of any flavor in order to hire ilegales who pose some small threat to his business and who must get at least a modicum of extra training in order to interact with an English-speaking clientele?
The only reason I can think of is that these ilegales are willing to work for low wages; and a large proportion of Americans will not do so. I don't know whether Americans won't take the jobs because those jobs are "beneath" them. What I do know, though, is that the ilegales seem to be willing to compete harder for those jobs, either by their work ethic or by their willingness to work for less.
Perhaps it's because many of them do not have an "entitlement" mentality that seems so prevalent among many Americans nowadays -- the mentality that says that they "deserve" ten bucks an hour for doing a job that doesn't contribute ten bucks an hour to the business' bottom line.
I'm not a sociologist with tons of statistics at my fingertips, so, unlike many of the posters on this forum, I simply don't have all the answers.
Americans of all races creeds and Color do indeed labor in all of the above listed categories of work, and having illegal immigrants take these jobs, even takes jobs away from high school kids simply trying to earn a buck for college or a summer sports camp....
Then what is it that the ilegale offers the business owner who will hire them? Why does the immigrant, illegal or otherwise, seem to be competing successfully with American workers? Is there a Secret Plot among all the businesses to "Hispanify" the United States -- or are these folks merely making sound business decisions to hire those whom will give them the best bang for the buck?
In any event, I know for a fact that Americans do indeed take these jobs...even in Arizona....yes even Sedona...where I used to live!
Ah, yes Sedona -- the richest city in Arizona, based on per-capita earnings of over $31,000, and the whitest, with an 92% percentage, is Sedona. ( www.absoluteastronomy.com... ), ( members7.clubphoto.com... ). I visit Sedona on occasion, but I live in Mesa which is, if I may be so bold, a bit more typical of the realities of Arizona.
Thats my point, so why in the world would we even be discussing the appropriateness of Vincente Fox's comment at all? It's basically a straw man argument/discussion...illegal immigrants are here illegally...so who cares if they will do the work of 20 slaves, horses, men or tractors....they are illegal and should be sent back to Mr. Fox....period!
You are certainly entitled to your opinion. Opinions are like noses; everyone has one -- except for Michael Jackson, and who cares what he thinks?
...I call it as I see it, and try to base it on facts....
Maybe I am too young and naive to discern your facts; what I have seen from you is several personal comments about me, and quite a bit of anger at ... something.
[edit on 16-5-2005 by Off_The_Street]
For my money I'll pay a little more for my next home (constructiion) a little more for my next computer software program (high tech) and even a little more for my next burger (mickey dees) if it will employee American citizens and legal immigrants!
I'm gonna pay one way or another...either in higher prices because of the higher wage to employ American citizens...or in taxes for the Social benefits for unemployed Americans and to fund illegal immigrants. Personally I perfer the former!
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
cafeman says:
For my money I'll pay a little more for my next home (constructiion) a little more for my next computer software program (high tech) and even a little more for my next burger (mickey dees) if it will employee American citizens and legal immigrants!
But it won't, and we both know that, and here is why:
The United States is competing for its economic life with other countries who have lower standards of living but similar skills. A Mumbai programmer is just as smart and savvy as a Minneapolis one, and will work for a lot less. A hotel maid from Tamaulipas works just as hard as someone from Topeka and will do so for less, as well. Therefore, they take away our jobs, because they offer a better deal for consumers.
Today, American companies and employers have a choice of two things: they can cut their costs drastically, or go out of business. Factories can cut their production costs by moving their operations overseas. "Working smarter" or robotic factories used to be a valid strategy, but the Asians and everyone else also work smarter and have robotic factories.
Local businesses have the same option: they can cut their employee costs or go out of business, whipped by another company which has successfully cut their costs. Most Americans are not willing to pay more for domestic manufacturers or unionized workers; if you don't believe me, I suggest you take a trip to the largest and most successful employer in the United States and walk through one of their stores.
You know, the one with all the smiley faces?
I'm gonna pay one way or another...either in higher prices because of the higher wage to employ American citizens...or in taxes for the Social benefits for unemployed Americans and to fund illegal immigrants. Personally I perfer the former!
Your preferences, like mine, are irrelevant.
My personal ideal would be to have the borders open to anyone who is willing to come and work, and not have any government welfare and babysitting at all. From an economic warfare point of view (and don't think we're not engaged in economic warfare -- which we're losing!), this minimizing of government support and welfare is what other countries are doing and they're beating the pants off us.
But it's not going to happen, and we both know that, too. We do have a "safety net" consisting of minimum wage, OSHA, rampant corporate and individual welfare, etcetera; the very things which make us enjoy our good life while losing it at the same time.
So businesses will do their best to cut their costs because they want to survive.
Welcome to the 21st century, cafeman.
Kudos...and points well made! Lol!
...should'nt we be demanding reimbursement cost of illegal immigration from the governments which those immigrants come from? Perhaps the U.S Nationalization of PEMEX OIL for a start!