Texas UFO - English words on it!, page 1

privacy

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times

Topic started on 13-5-2005 @ 07:31 AM by FlyersFan

I was stationed at Fort Hood TX back in 1982-1983.
I didn't see anything like this. Of course, they might
not have been there at the time. Fort Hood is HUGE.
Plenty of room to fly these things. But of course, it's
also a training ground for the tanks and infantry.
Ya' wouldn't want a tank shooting down one of
these if they really are 'ours'...

**********************************
www.ufocasebook.com...

Excerpt -

On 04-09-2005 I saw what I believe to be a UFO in Sydney, Comanche
County Texas at 9:12 local time. I offer some unique observations.

.... snip

Upon my return to the motor home ... The object approached from the
south-southwest and while moving north-north east, passed almost
directly overhead making no sound whatsoever. I estimate its altitude to
be somewhere about 800 feet and its airspeed speed approximately 30
mph. It "floated" and did not fly as it obviously had insufficient airspeed to
fly. (I am a Physicist & an FAA Licensed Pilot)

While the sky was almost entirely black behind it, I could clearly see its
underside as it was illuminated from the fading sunlight to the west. I
estimate that the machine was about 60 feet wide and 80 feet long and
10 feet thick at the rear. Under its belly, there was a straight line going
from its leading tip toward the center of the aft edge of the fuselage,
which was perpendicular to its travel. This straight edge clearly showed its
shape to be three-dimensional. The straight line showed that its belly was
V-shaped, much like the hull of a speedboat. It was similar to the space
shuttle as when viewed from in front and below the shuttle.

This marking was absolutely shocking, as I could actually read it! It was
white print outlined in black on a red arrow pointing toward a rectangle of
sorts. The arrow pointed at a something rectangular that I cannot define,
but I clearly could read these three words, “EMERGENCY RELEASE and
RESCUE.” In the same place were other words that appeared too fuzzy to
read. I suspect that these words were “PULL FOR...”

More at the site - www.ufocasebook.com...

Additional reference -
www.nuforc.org...

[edit on 5/13/2005 by FlyersFan]

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 07:43 AM by Gazrok

Pretty strange sighting there....if he's genuine.

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 07:55 AM by Tom Sawyer

Well, all i can say is this: You really don't think that an American test craft would have German words all over it. (although i wouldn't be suprised if one of these comes up with Russian). The answer to this one is simple. It is a military test project. If no one is suposed to see it, what does it matter that it has giant english words written on the side. It shouldn't be classified as 'unidentified' since it has hard proof of american orgins all over it.

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 08:02 AM by FlyersFan

Originally posted by Tom Sawyer
It is a military test project.

That's what I think. I think it's a military test of our
version of captured alien technology. IF .. IF .. the
guy is for real. And if he is for real, this could be
some proof that we have indeed captured UFO's.
How else would we get such a boost in technology?
From gas guzzling cars to anti-gravity silent round
flying vehicles...

[edit on 5/13/2005 by FlyersFan]

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 08:10 AM by Gazrok

Well, it's a pretty established fact that military tech is usually about 20-30 years ahead of commercial tech, but yeah, seems like we're looking at a bigger leap here....

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 08:35 AM by daboga75

Originally posted by Tom Sawyer
It shouldn't be classified as 'unidentified' since it has hard proof of american orgins all over it.

Yes, but still, no one knows exactly what it is, lol.

How else would we get such a boost in technology?

They hold back more than we think. While I believe in possible govt cover-up of e.t. activity, I also believe the govt. hordes controversial technology and we are left virtually unaware of the progress they have made.

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 09:33 AM by merka

I knew some UFO's are definetly earth based since I read the report about some fisherman in the western US (I think)... When he opened fire on a UFO hovering above him, a hatch opened and someone yelled "stop shooting at us you idiot!". Yep, that's an actual UFO report

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 11:50 AM by Junkheap

Here's a link to the report that Merka was talking about.

www.rense.com...

Poor guy.

[edit on 13-5-2005 by Junkheap]

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 12:27 PM by enrage

i wonder what ever happened to that fisherman. i would be pretty paranoid knowing that some government agency has a photo of me

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 12:29 PM by andrew817

I belive it to be true.

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 12:31 PM by Hozer

One small problem with the fisherman's story.....there is no 100 shot banana mag for the Ruger 10-22.

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 12:37 PM by whipnet

They hold back more than we think. While I believe in possible govt cover-up of e.t. activity, I also believe the govt. hordes controversial technology and we are left virtually unaware of the progress they have made.

Yes, they do trickle the technology down to us. Milking it for every cent.
I believe we have invented Zero-Point energy, but do you know what that would do to our economy? Too bad really..

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 12:50 PM by Junkheap

Originally posted by Hozer
One small problem with the fisherman's story.....there is no 100 shot banana mag for the Ruger 10-22.

Here's a picture of the type of magazine the Ruger 10-22 uses. It's just a 10 shot magazine.

www.walmart.com...

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 12:52 PM by lost_shaman

I live in rual Texas , and also have had a UFO Sighting , (although not of a triangle craft ) and the question I always come back to is this. Why would the Millitary test experimental super secret technology on Private farmland , when they have so many other and better suited places for this type of testing ?

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 12:56 PM by Hozer

Originally posted by Junkheap

Originally posted by Hozer
One small problem with the fisherman's story.....there is no 100 shot banana mag for the Ruger 10-22.

Here's a picture of the type of magazine the Ruger 10-22 uses. It's just a 10 shot magazine.

www.walmart.com...

Yup, if he's telling the truth about the siteing he's got his mag size wrong. The largest for the 10-22 is a Butler Creek 25 shot.

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 01:38 PM by merka

Originally posted by Junkheap

Originally posted by Hozer
One small problem with the fisherman's story.....there is no 100 shot banana mag for the Ruger 10-22.

Here's a picture of the type of magazine the Ruger 10-22 uses. It's just a 10 shot magazine.

www.walmart.com...

The writer probably got it wrong (100 instead of 10 or something). But it does have a 50 round drum I think.

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 02:42 PM by el cid

to me, the story just "reads" true...if that makes any sense. the "validity" of it reminded me of when i read "above black" by dan sherman.

reply posted on 13-5-2005 @ 02:42 PM by MagicaRose

I think that this story about the fisherman is a perfect example pf disinformation.
Why did he have a weapon like that out on a fishing trip??

Pages: ^^TOP^^