Originally posted by LiamCA
Supposing there is something hidden, you can't tell how far in each direction it has been blurred, for all you know it could be 5 pixels wide but have had its surroundings blurred aswell - this means you can't produce any sort of accurate scale.
Originally posted by johnlear
Richard Hoagland has posted an Apollo 10 photo (32-4816) which shows some structures rising over Triesnecker. If you go to enterprisemission.com click on Missing Apollo 11 TV Examples. Scroll down just below those 9 pictures and just above LO3-84M is an untitled photo. That is AS10-32-4816.
Originally posted by Musclor
Source of images :
HOW IN THE HELL IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THE ANOMALIES ARE ALSO FOUND ON THE SOUTH SIDE AND THE FAR SIDE ?
We can clearly see that the anomalies are much bigger when seen from south and far side.
Also note that the anomalies are ALL located on the far side of the moon, and ALL near south and north poles.
This is getting more and more interesting fox.
[edit on 16/5/2005 by Musclor]
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
You think with all of nasa's technology they would just "smudge" a picture? To them, photoshop is like atari. Gimme a break. I wouldn't doubt that there is something on the moon built by man for some purpose, sure why not. Colony on the dark side? I can almost buy that. But NASA releasing cheaply edited photos to the public about something so big, not a chance. And considering most UFOs are seem during wartime, makes you think it might just be wierd tax-payer-wasted-money war machines that will never get used except to make San Diego go "wtf"