New Evidences of Extraterrestrial Lunar Bases

Supposing there is something hidden, you can't tell how far in each direction it has been blurred, for all you know it could be 5 pixels wide but have had its surroundings blurred aswell - this means you can't produce any sort of accurate scale.

Richard Hoagland has posted an Apollo 10 photo (32-4816) which shows some structures rising over Triesnecker. If you go to enterprisemission.com click on Missing Apollo 11 TV Examples. Scroll down just below those 9 pictures and just above LO3-84M is an untitled photo. That is AS10-32-4816.

never mind...



removed remarks that shouldn't have been made.. i was having a bad day.

Originally posted by LiamCA
Supposing there is something hidden, you can't tell how far in each direction it has been blurred, for all you know it could be 5 pixels wide but have had its surroundings blurred aswell - this means you can't produce any sort of accurate scale.

Then lets suppose it was done in both directions the same amount. If it matches, odds for coincidence will still be low enough to be sure.


edit:
just to clarify one more thing.. WTF are those maps doing on NAVY.mil???

[edit on 24-8-2006 by krif]

it's kinda kool, but it's also Kinda wack!.

Originally posted by johnlear
Richard Hoagland has posted an Apollo 10 photo (32-4816) which shows some structures rising over Triesnecker. If you go to enterprisemission.com click on Missing Apollo 11 TV Examples. Scroll down just below those 9 pictures and just above LO3-84M is an untitled photo. That is AS10-32-4816.

I've seen these before, and they are pretty amazing, and especially this untitled one. Apparently, these are the things that NASA must be smudging out of the images.

What do you guy's think this looks like, I see tyre tracks but on the image scanner program I couldn,t follow them

If the smudges are indeed photo editing, we are getting ripped off.... Rubber stamp tool!! These gov agents should have better skills in photo editing than that considering what they are probably paid...

Maybe I should apply for a job at nasa's editing dept.

hey guys. new here.

I didn't see that any one has posted this link.
I apologize in advance if it has been posted before. I would say that this video,
the one on the bottom, lends credibility to these photos being censored.

check out the one on the bottom. called

"NASA Airbrushed UFOs / Lunar Base Towers"

www.theufomovie.com...

^ while i was watching the trailer1.wmv from that site i found something interesting.
At about 00:39 they talk about UFOs over Bagda.
I remember during the start of the war i was watching(with my wife) a portguese TV news and they went live with a reporter from his hotel apartment, so the reporter started talking (live) and all of sudden those exactly same lights appeared.
He said there wasnt any sound at all(we couldnt hear no sound either). They were hovering there for his entire transmission and you could see from his comments and expression that he was really surprised too.

I, and my wife, got so impressed with the situation that we never forgot about it.


PS.
During that time US was not in Iraq yet......it occurred at the very beggining.

ok.. back to reality. where are the shadows???...

I read half way through this thread and got bored with te b*tching . SO I dunno if this theory has been put forward before , the moon having used to actually being part of earth millions of years ago , couldn't these structures actually be part of a "ancient-advanced"(sic) culture that was just simply around at the wrong place and time and got some of their glass castles blasted off into space , like I said just a theory so feel free to point the holes in it

So, now unless logic has left my little mind, how would they have built these "towers" IF infact they are towers! So, now we have pics of these ugs towers - i need to find a building company like that which built these towers - I do NOT for one minute believe that there ISN'T something there, but how does one build something SO MASSIVE and leave no trace around it. Even the craters are perfect or are they artificial. Ther HAS to be some evidence around that SOMETHING built these in SOME way or were they planted there already complete or built while hovering in the air. There has to be some sort of evidence because what are the chances you would see buildings/towers/structures (unless only one) without some sort of connection. I don't believe they flew from one to the other. Yes, perhaps underground access, BUT again, i ask the question, why no evidence of some kind of constructive activities that SHOULD have taken place... As i said, i DO believe there is something on the moon - where there is smoke.........

Originally posted by Musclor


Source of images :
Southside.jpg
Farside.jpg


HOW IN THE HELL IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THE ANOMALIES ARE ALSO FOUND ON THE SOUTH SIDE AND THE FAR SIDE ?


We can clearly see that the anomalies are much bigger when seen from south and far side.

Also note that the anomalies are ALL located on the far side of the moon, and ALL near south and north poles.

This is getting more and more interesting fox.

[edit on 16/5/2005 by Musclor]

there is still one thing: perspective... when you look at those pictures you can see very different perspectives (look at the craters)...

this means that those areas were examined and photographed from different angles...

...this means that there is really something out there that government don't want us to see...

...another example of why UFO/Aliens area needs to be consolidated/purged -- this was a topic of discussion recently in another thread; grabbed this from March of this year. Still, those whited-out towers remain.

You think with all of nasa's technology they would just "smudge" a picture? To them, photoshop is like atari. Gimme a break. I wouldn't doubt that there is something on the moon built by man for some purpose, sure why not. Colony on the dark side? I can almost buy that. But NASA releasing cheaply edited photos to the public about something so big, not a chance. And considering most UFOs are seem during wartime, makes you think it might just be wierd tax-payer-wasted-money war machines that will never get used except to make San Diego go "wtf"

reply to post by Musclor


Look at this:
rapidshare.com...

[edit on 22-7-2009 by difeind]

I cant believe some people are passing them off as mosaic edges and specks on the lense. I use photoshop all the time and can definately say this is the most obvious use of airbrushing I have seen. It's not even as if they have attempted to make a good job of it, theyve just smudged out a big rectangle where something else should be. And specks of dust on the lense do not have straight edges and corners.

reply to post by chris01621


Habe a look
rapidshare.com...

Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
You think with all of nasa's technology they would just "smudge" a picture? To them, photoshop is like atari. Gimme a break. I wouldn't doubt that there is something on the moon built by man for some purpose, sure why not. Colony on the dark side? I can almost buy that. But NASA releasing cheaply edited photos to the public about something so big, not a chance. And considering most UFOs are seem during wartime, makes you think it might just be wierd tax-payer-wasted-money war machines that will never get used except to make San Diego go "wtf"

I must admit it puzzles me that they would make such a poor effort at conceiling something, though apparently people in these departments are hired on how well they can keep a secret and not how well they can do their job. Also I would like to know how long ago the image was taken because photoshop isn't that old. Another theory could be that maybe theyre trying to tell us something. Looking at all the nasa ufo footage, some of it completely blatant, I cant help but wonder how this footage got released, surely theyre not that careless, or are they? Maybe there's people on the inside wanting the truth out but dont want to make it so obvious that they'll lose their jobs.