New Evidences of Extraterrestrial Lunar Bases, page 7


Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 9-1-2006 @ 04:45 AM by TheShroudOfMemphis
Is it just me or...







This opens up a potential pandora's box for his 'moonwalk' dance!



[edit on 9-1-2006 by TheShroudOfMemphis]


reply posted on 9-1-2006 @ 06:01 AM by airtrax007
Enlargements made from both Apollo and LO photography show anomalous structures out of the path of further deposition and wasting that have walls and buttresses higher than the natural terrain. Meteoric rain degrades them but straight walls within walls simply don’t appear on levels higher than the highest points of crater flanks which some of the ‘archologies’ I’ve found seem to do. I believe these are remnants of structures that used to be much larger and more defined.

The problem of disclosure seems to go back to the infancy of our space program. The ones who are likely to be aware of the lunar and other planetary artifacts are ones who know of the Brookings Report. Written in 1959 by the Brookings Institution, it was titled, Proposed Studies of the Implications of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs and was delivered to the Chairman of NASA’s Committee on Long-Range Studies and to Congress. It suggested that data accrued through space exploration that would reveal artifacts of intelligent life- be withheld from the public for fear that society would disintegrate and cause scientific, psychological, and social upheaval.


Of course there are anamolies on our surrounding planetary bodies. We have the proof in the washed out pictures that our government crames down our throat every day, you just have to be able to sift through the mundane pictures and look at the pictures that have these washed out and doctored up , i think the people that do this are really trying to show us that there is something up there, but from behind the big mans back.Or else it would have been done a lot better.


reply posted on 9-1-2006 @ 06:46 AM by MarkLuitzen
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
Is it just me or...







This opens up a potential pandora's box for his 'moonwalk' dance!



[edit on 9-1-2006 by TheShroudOfMemphis]


those pics can be everything u see michael jackson but it even might be a
luger pistol from wo2 or a nazi whom brings a hitlergreeting.


reply posted on 20-8-2006 @ 03:17 PM by InSaneTK
Originally posted by Xabora
The blurred objects are suspected 'patent leather artifacts'.

But actually those are prolly spots on the moon that were not photographed.
Check here with this undoctered Farside Image:



That is NOT the real backside of the moon, look here. i did photo analyze on it with photoshop and marked all wierd places! That image is very very fake, it looks like it's been put together by many images. Some of the parts marked in red is just to unrealistic to be a real image.

(analyzed) (click on image after the link-image to get full size)


(original of analyzed)





[edit on 20-8-2006 by InSaneTK]
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



UFO Filmed From Avebury Crop Circle, UK With Multiple Witnesses
  Posted 19 days ago with 89 member flags
The Men In Black(OPs) The Aviary & UFOs
  Posted 12 days ago with 83 member flags
Did a RAF Tornado crash during a UFO intercept mission in 1997?
  Posted 14 days ago with 39 member flags
What is this comming out of our star?
  Posted 9 days ago with 33 member flags
Huge Unknown Objects orbiting the Sun for months...?
  Posted 8 days ago with 29 member flags
The CIA and the UFO Mythos
  Posted 16 days ago with 26 member flags
UFO Reporting for the 21st Century!
  Posted 12 days ago with 26 member flags