It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MCory1
One thing that strikes me as strange, and the main reason I'm somewhat skeptical of this, is the poor quality of the censorship. I would think that if there was something on there that just had to be hidden, whomever censored it would have gone to the length to hire a highly trained graphic tech to do the job, someone who does it for a living and who wouldn't make it that blurred. I mean, even someone who doesn't know much at all about Photoshop could've at least blurred out all of that one 'structure.'
Aside from that, why release the images at all if there's something that you want to hide? No one in the public really gets to know exactly how many images NASA has, no one gets a direct line to Hubble or anything. There could've been a "signal loss," and the images with the good info didn't make it back to Earth. Not that difficult to keep images from a probe or non-public telescope out of the public eye.
Originally posted by DeltaChaos
So WHERE is this location on the moon?
looks to be lit, so it must be on the side we CAN see. I would think such smokestackes would be visable to more than a couple of our powerfull telescopes....
If this is supposed to be the DARK side of the moon why is it so well lit?
If this was taken from the side of the moon we CAN see, then are we to think that whatever race made this stuff has cloaking capabilities they use all the time and the pics we are seeing is all we CAN see? We see the blurry whirry effects of such cloaking devices?
I would tend to think photos would VERY well be doctored to hide such buildings,(in the nature of hiding everything from us and all) those are some serious smokestacks! But then I wonder...WHY has NOBODY picked up on this if its on the visable side of the moon I mean COME ON!.......................so maybe it really IS visable to us in just the very way the photos are showing
Maybe its cloaking devise residual we are seeing?
Originally posted by Jaychael
Here's the FAQ page regarding these pics
www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...
Read the BOLD paragraph. The mosaics were preliminary produced some time ago.
On a side note. I'd expect the Mars Mosaics to be cleaner due to better equipment and where the pics were shot from. land/space.
If this is supposed to be the DARK side of the moon why is it so well lit?
Originally posted by Musclor
Originally posted by Jaychael
Here's the FAQ page regarding these pics
www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...
Read the BOLD paragraph. The mosaics were preliminary produced some time ago.
On a side note. I'd expect the Mars Mosaics to be cleaner due to better equipment and where the pics were shot from. land/space.
I know this FAQ. Nothing new, classical explanations, all is normal, etc etc... Seriously, who buy that ?
If they show me a real explanation of the things we are seeing, then i may review my position. But there is obviously none...
Guys, this is more subtle than that. People behind this cover-up are probably very intelligent. They try to see how we think and react, and they set things perfectly in order to create confusion and skepticism. This is the way i see it.
Clementine satellite has spent two months taking "officially"almost 2 milion images of the moon. I don't see them checking 2 milions of pictures, in detail. That's why there will be probably more discoveries.
It seems a lot of people have their heart set on one explanation, and if they hear anything to the contrary it's a bald-faced lie. Just my two cents...