It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Who would you ban?

page: 3
0
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 12 2005 @ 03:20 PM
link   
I'd ban anyone from F-ing, Austria..
It's just not right to be from there..




posted on May, 12 2005 @ 03:34 PM
link   


Who would you ban?


My that's one baited question....


Let's see....

Anyone who believed that hollow-earth dwelling reptoids are really running the planet....


Anyone who sided with the Hasselhoff supporters during that recent debacle....


Hehe....


I can see this thread going down like this:



[edit on 12-5-2005 by Gazrok]



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 03:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by James the Lesser
Where to start? Well, jokingly, me, give me some time off from ATS for once. Jokingly, all the Mods and Super mods for a week and let ATS go nuts.(Let the inmates run the asylum)

Seriously? Well, I am tired of all the head up bum people, so bye bye die hard republicans/christians. Sorry, but if your only defense is "Bible says so" you need to pull your head out of your bum and learn about the real world.


No diehard_democrats? Shucks, and I thought I was popular...

I'd ban James the Lesser for not mentioning me.


j/k



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 03:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by James the Lesser
Sorry, but if your only defense is "Bible says so" you need to pull your head out of your bum and learn about the real world.


Exactly, and that's why you should be banned.
Your inability to make one, just one post, that does not in any way reflect your personal issues with christianity.

But now I think about it, without your idiocy ATS may just get a little boring...


Ah well, at least the topic managed to reach page 3. ;+)

I'm glad most people don't have any serious suggestions.
While I was thinking about who I would really want to be banned, I found out that even those people (James the Lesser, truthseeka) add in some way something to what is ATS for me.
Dealing with "difficult" people not only happens on ATS, but also in real life, and ATS gives us a great training!



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 03:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by JAK

Originally posted by Jakko
*starts writing a threatening u2u to JAK about moving this thread to BTS*




hahahaha, I knew it!
SO only makes ATSers under the age of 8 moderator!



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 03:52 PM
link   
Nuh - uhh...



I'm 8 and a haff...



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 04:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by James the Lesser
Sorry, but if your only defense is "Bible says so" you need to pull your head out of your bum and learn about the real world.

I hope your not making a generalazation about all christians, or else your going to make alot of people very angry, including me.(btw, thats not a threat, its probably whats going to happen)
I wouldn't ban anyone because no one that has made me angry is worth banning.



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 04:31 PM
link   
I would ban James the Lesser. He is racist against any1 who believe in any sort of religion



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 04:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by James the Lesser
Jokingly, all the Mods and Super mods for a week and let ATS go nuts.(Let the inmates run the asylum)

Happened for a whole day. April 1st?


Seriously? Well, I am tired of all the head up bum people, so bye bye die hard republicans/christians. Sorry, but if your only defense is "Bible says so" you need to pull your head out of your bum and learn about the real world.


As for the "head up bum" people, are they the ones that disagree with you? Does that make people that disagree with you automatically wrong then?

As for the second comment, it's called "faith". Now some people have it and some don't. It still doesn't make someone stupid or mean they don't understand the world. They just have a different viewpoint.

My vote for banning then (if I have to say), would be people that don't understand there are always two sides to something.



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 04:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by ZeddicusZulZorander
My vote for banning then (if I have to say), would be people that don't understand there are always two sides to something.


Allright, but would you agree with me if I said that truth is not relative.
One side has to be right.

If truth is relative, even that statement is relative, meaning that it isn't always true.



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 04:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by SpittinCobra
they see all






HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

i was praying someone would mention me...

my pick:

spittincobra





posted on May, 12 2005 @ 04:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by they see ALL

Originally posted by SpittinCobra
they see all






HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

i was praying someone would mention me...

my pick:

spittincobra




I knew you would like it, I was wondering how long it was going to take you to see.



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 05:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jakko
Allright, but would you agree with me if I said that truth is not relative.
One side has to be right.


A better question is "what is truth?"

The philosophical debate of absolute truth is a tough one. Aristotle presented the Law of Identity in his day as A = A. It basically means that what is...is, regardless of whether a person perceives it for its true nature.

When we look at an object, we may only see it in the spectrum of light available to our eyes. Red, blue, green, orange, etc. But there are other spectrums of light beyond the visible. That same object, in its true form, is also visible in those other spectrums.

We have senses, but by themselves they can't tell us about an object. If we only could taste an object, we would not know the color or shape. If we could only feel it, we could not tell what sound it makes or how it smells. One must use the brain to consider the information gained in all it's forms.

In many cases though, even though A = A, who is the judge?

Me, even though I can't see or you who maybe can't smell. Which one is right with the absolute truth?

Interesting subject, no?



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 05:16 PM
link   
Yes it is interesting indeed.
I think it is important to seperate perception from facts though.

Someones flawed perception does not change what an object IS.
If an object is white (not absorbing color) and someone (because of some disability) sees that inverted and thinks it's black, it doesn't change the color of this object.

Even if everyone on earth would end up having this disability and look at the object as black, it will not change what the object IS, which is white because it does not absorb any color.



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 05:21 PM
link   
Yes Zed, but for a week, and not on April 1st so no one would see it coming!

Also, no, if you disagree with me you may actually have valid points that prove me to be wrong, it has happened before and will happen again. But when you get the "I'm right because I said so" people it just doesn't work that way. "Gee, where is the proof?" SHUT UP! Bible says so! BOOM! Head explodes from all the blood rushing to it. But that is all most of them have, the bible, which is soooo wrong that the entire Exodus thing is wrong. Never any Jew SLaves in Egypt.(Hebrew, Jew, whatever) so never any exodus, no ten commandments, no Moses, nothing.

Hell, I get smacked around by people like Nygdan, Bout Time, Rant, Intrepid, Marg, so forth alot. But then you get FlyersFan, EdSinger, CazMedia, Dr. Horacid(who is now banned) or Jakko who all they have is "Bible Said So.". It is annoying. "Hmmm, science proves this and this and that wrong." "Nope, bible says it's right because it says so, and to prove it it says it is right because it says so." "What about proof?" "SATAN!!! SKY IS FALLING! KILL! RAPE!! SLAUGHTER!!!"

Of course it does make for easy debates. Use science/facts/real world, they use fairyland pixie dust, I get a boost to my ego knowing they have nothing but a fairy flying around with a magic wand blessing people, and not the catholic priest kind either.


Also, no problem with all religons. Budda or whatever is great, peace, happy, big fat guy smiling as opposed to skinny guy dead on a cross. Wicca/Witchcraft is cool to, they the first doctors, pharmicists, shrinks, so forth. They also believe in peace, not harming others, and the image is usually a hot naked woman or an old woman with many years of wisdom, love, and life,(goddess) and a centaur with horns who represents men, sun, hunting, so forth.(Hurn)

Edit: Great Site, I know, evil satan, kill rape slaughter, whatever other words in the christian vocabulary, but it is a great site!

www.evilbible.com...

[edit on 12-5-2005 by James the Lesser]



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 05:27 PM
link   
Okay I take back what I said.
James should be banned.



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 05:31 PM
link   
Wow, really surprised not to see my name on this list.

Kudos to those taking this in the vein it is meant.

BAN to those serious about it.


Me? I'd ban asala. Can you imagine the outcry? It would be heard around the world.

Sorry asala, I think big.


You know I love ya.



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 05:37 PM
link   
No one ban intrepid! If we do, then we have a dragon orphan, and that isn't good!



:w:
:shk:
:bash::bnghd:: pbjtime:

There, now I've used all of the BTS thingies...



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 05:38 PM
link   
Ban me eh! well ill just ban you back!


i know i know!!!!!! we could have one of them 10 step turn around and press the BAN! slowest gets banned!!



posted on May, 12 2005 @ 05:41 PM
link   
for my own good!




new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join