It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dubiousone
The person who was served in that manner has a duty to respond to the citation. If the person does not respnd to the citation or appear in court, she will be found guilty, the verdict and nonappearance will be report to DOL, and DOL will take adverse action against the person's driving privileges. The court will enforce the fine.
Those of you think the officer acted appropriately because he could be off on another call or home watching a mariners game if she responded more quickly to his commands, remember, the US is not a police state yet, but your approval of this kind of police conduct will help it get there much more quickly.
What happens if I refuse to sign a ticket? What can I do if I disagree with the traffic or parking ticket?
The law mandates that law enforcement personnel issuing the citation take you before a magistrate (judge) without necessary delay if you fail to sign the ticket. By signing the ticket you can appear before a magistrate at a later date, avoiding a jail visit. Signing a ticket is not an admission of guilt, just a promise to appear before the magistrate.
If you disagree with the ticket, you should appear before the commissioner or judge in traffic court. Here you will be able to explain your side of the incident and introduce items of evidence in your defense. The court will also listen to the officer’s account of the incident and admit his/her relevant evidence. The court will then render an impartial decision concerning the ticket.
Originally posted by dubiousone
Those of you think the officer acted appropriately because he could be off on another call or home watching a mariners game if she responded more quickly to his commands, remember, the US is not a police state yet, but your approval of this kind of police conduct will help it get there much more quickly.
a taeser should be treated EXACTLY like a gun, last resort option ONLY.
Originally posted by loam
www.cfpc.ca...
QUESTION A 24-year-old patient of mine, who was 23 weeks pregnant at the time, suffered a minor electric shock while using her hair dryer. She said she felt the current in her right hand and she was wearing shoes. She was observed in an emergency room for several hours and then discharged home. Is her pregnancy or fetus at risk now or later in the pregnancy?
ANSWER There are conflicting reports on how harmful electric shock is to a fetus. The clinical spectrum of electrical injury ranges from a transient unpleasant sensation felt by a mother and no effect on her fetus to fetal death either immediately or few days later. Several factors, such as the magnitude of the current and the duration of contact, are thought to affect outcome. In this case, it appears the current did not travel through her abdomen. Recommendations for fetal monitoring after electrocution have been published.
I'm quite sure that you have never had children, based on how prepared you are to minimize the risk.
Of 31 pregnant women who called us, 28 were exposed to electric shock while using home appliances. Twenty-eight of these women delivered healthy newborns. One baby had a ventricular septal defect that closed spontaneously during early childhood, and two women had spontaneous abortions, one temporally related to the accidental injury, the other probably not associated with it. We found no differences in mean birth weight, gestational age at delivery, rates of cesarean section, or neonatal distress between electric-shock and control groups.
enronoutrunhomerun
She was clearly in the wrong.....But there are other ways to go....Bring out a tow truck and move while she's in the car - See if that won't get her out....If not, she'll just get a free ride to the junk yard.....
Need I offer a slew of examples where a taser actually killed someone
How about offering studies that show that this alternate setting unacceptably dangerous to use?
[edit on 11-5-2005 by Nygdan]
Originally posted by Zipdot
He asked his supervisor for advice and his supervisor gave him the go-ahead to arrest. She refused arrest.
Zip
DubiousOne, if I hadn’t just voted my last WATS vote I'd of voted for that post, spot on! Thank you.
The officer will ask you to sign the ticket, thereby acknowledging that you will appear in court. Your signature does not do anything but say you will appear.
He asked his supervisor for advice and his supervisor gave him the go-ahead to arrest. She refused arrest.
Not requiring the person cited to sign the citation is in my opinion a negligent act on the officer's part. The person cited should be required to know their rights before they break contact with the citing offer.
If a person can't take responsibility for their conduct, then I guess they're SOL. I don't care if you're drunk, stoned, pregnant or an alien. The police have a job, and they're going to do it.
* * * we all agree SHE deserved everything she got. * * *
The woman deserved to be tazered.
fact of the matter is that her choices are the ones that could have led to danger for her baby.
from dubiousone
Subz, you can exclude me from your broad generalization. She did not deserve what she got and she certainly did not deserve to be tazed. This incident is an example of the cops violently flexing their muscle to intimidate!
You have voted Zipdot for the Way Above Top Secret award
As for your insistance that she didn't "have" to sign the ticket, please see my posts at the top of page 6 if you would like to become more familiar with the actual LAW.
(Washington State Statutes)
Such a citation "shall include. . . a place where the person arrested may
sign." RCW 46.64.015. The statute adds that in order to secure release,
the arrested person "must give his or her written promise to appear in
court as required by the citation and notice by signing in the
appropriate place the written citation and notice served by the arresting
officer. . . ." RCW 46.64.015
Case Law - Washington v Richards
It thus appears that the "promise to appear" portion of a citation is
an essential feature of a traffic citation. If the arrestee refuses to
sign the citation, he or she may be held in jail. Furthermore, if the
arrestee signs and then fails to appear as promised, a bench warrant may
result, as it did in the present case. See CrRLJ 2.5.
Therefore, attempting to obtain an arrestee's signature on a citation is
necessary to the discharge of a state trooper's public duties. The
failure to give that signature has legal effect, as does the failure to
appear as promised after a signature is provided.