It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Nygdan
If its been shown to be safe, and, as it turns out, he probably only used a minor 'zap' mode, not the actual stun mode, then this woman is making a mountain out of a mole hill, just like she did with the ticket in the first place
Speeding in a school zone and arguing with an officer that's just doing their job is one thing....We all agree on that right?
But using force on a pregnant woman over a minor offence is another thing entirely...
I don't care how much of an idiot some one is or how rash their logic may be at the time - TO ME, it still does not justify shocking a pregnant lady - I don't care if pregnant lab rats have been tested and passed with flying colors.....period...
If they had let the damn woman go with her unsigned ticket, things would have unfolded quite a bit differently, and I think she would have learned her lesson much better rather than being put in a situation where it was her ignorant attempt at protecting her ideologies...
Officers have a way of pushing people over the edge who simply need not be pushed.....Normal, calm, everyday people can be put into a situation where it's them against the world and not a damn thing is going to stop them
We humans are stubborn animals....We don't like being told things we don't want to her - Maybe she was late for work....Is that an excuse? No....But it's a button that can be pushed....
Confrontations are something we should all try to avoid...and maybe the officer should have just said - Okay mam, don't sign it....but you'll be hearing from us soon....I think that would have sunk a bit deeper into her skin than a 50,000 volt shock....
Originally posted by loam that could have resulted in serious injury or death to an 8mo old unborn child!
That violence is not the solution to violence....Regardless of in who's hands the baton rests..
Originally posted by Nygdan
Demonstrate that it can do this. We all immediately thought of some bloated pregnant woman writhing around (hair standing on end, her skeleton flashing in the lightening bolts, heck maybe th babies skeleton too), but, how accurate does anyone actually think that that is?
Took me all of three seconds to google that question....
www.cfpc.ca...
I'm quite sure that you have never had children, based on how prepared you are to minimize the risk.
Originally posted by Nygdan
That violence is not the solution to violence....Regardless of in who's hands the baton rests..
I think it can result in a solution to violence, depending on who's skull is thwacking under that same baton.
If him and some other cops stopped her for speeding, in a school zone, when school was starting nonetheless and kids are everywhere, and she starts flippign out, and they can't physically pry her out of the car, is a minor zap from this thing really all that inappropriate? How violent is it? I'm not familiar with this other non-incapacitating mode.
The above referenced article has nothing to do with tasers.
Originally posted by drogo
there are just so many ways that this could have been resolved without a taeser. a taeser should be treated EXACTLY like a gun, last resort option ONLY.
Originally posted by Zipdot
The woman put her unborn child in danger by speeding and then again by getting herself into a physical confrontation with an authority that had the right to smack her down. She should be ashamed of herself.
Zip