It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sex with boys: The root of Islamic Terror.

page: 1
0
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 9 2005 @ 10:43 AM
link   
Took a double take after reading that title? So did I.

I usually pride myself at not just pasting entire articles, but this time I need to. It’s not long and I don’t think I could paraphrase it any better.

To summarize the article however, it basically states that a major drive in Islamic Terrorism is due to sexual tension and humiliation from homosexual abuse by other men. Again, it’s best to just read the article. I am sure we will all have some “interesting” comments once you guys have read it.

The article: Link


“ALL SERIAL KILLERS, almost without exception, are severely sexually abused as children. The kind of people who hijack a plane with innocent people and drive it into a building with thousands of other innocent people are related to this phenomenon.
When sociopaths rape and kill, they do not see their victims as human beings, but only as objects. This is because the sociopaths were themselves, at one time, used as objects – as their bodily integrity was repeatedly violated. The rage that results from sexual abuse is one thing, but when combined with living in a dysfunctional culture of sexual repression and misogyny, where love is reduced to violent domination, it is quite another.

.”

One line that stands out to me is: “Socially segregated from women, Arab men succumb to homosexual behavior. But, interestingly enough, there is no word for "homosexual" in their culture in the modern Western sense. That is because having sex with boys, or with effeminate men, is seen as a social norm.” It sounds to me like single men have homosexual sex with boys on a normal basis. It’s not weird or out of the ordinary at all. But the psychological repercussions are still there for the boys who were violated.

So these homosexually violated boys grow up to be men with severe issues. At the very least they continue the cycle of homosexual abuse on young boys. But this homosexual abuse causes tension they cannot relieve any other way as long as they remain un-married, thus creating this massive group of psychologically damaged men prone to violence to make up for their emasculation.

Bottom line? The Islamic culture breeds terrorism through legal homosexual abuse of young boys compounded by rigid laws governing un-married heterosexual sex. Maybe with loosening of Islamic law governing un-married sex may help this issue?





[edit on 9-5-2005 by skippytjc]

Edited to remove all of otehr person's work, except for on paragraph.

[edit on 10-5-2005 by Thomas Crowne]




posted on May, 9 2005 @ 10:49 AM
link   
its true that people from the region are involving sexual abuses but remember that its a human problem all around the world not just by Islam or by the color of their skin.



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 10:50 AM
link   
I think there is little merit in this argument. One could equally claim that most right wing nuts have been molested by Catholics priests in the past. Kind of silly and unsubstantiated. Even the opening lines of the article are poorly thought out. Equating serial killers with the 9/11 highjackers is absurd.



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 10:51 AM
link   
Klling and maiming the people who actualy did this to them would be to easy i guess...

Raising your kids in the life style they do with regard to wemon, they are asking for this suff to happen, heck look at the catholic priests...



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 10:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Aelita
I think there is little merit in this argument. Kind of silly and unsubstantiated. Even the opening lines of the article are poorly thought out.


For real.


Someone needs to set him up with Ann Coulter!



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:00 AM
link   
skippy, your link appears somewhat biased to me.
frontpagemag.com

Sanc'.



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:08 AM
link   
Frontpagemag is another right wing "news" site like WND and NewsMax.

I'd take anything they say with several grains of salt - not that pederasty isn't tolerated in some Islamic cultures, it is (in some), but they are hardly unique in this regard.

The link to terrorism is iffy at best, where are all the ancient Greek suicide bombers? The article is a mishmash of overbroad generalizations, speculation, and imputational logic.

[edit on 5/9/05 by xmotex]



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by sanctum
skippy, your link appears somewhat biased to me.
frontpagemag.com

Sanc'.


Can you document that? Prove this isnt true if you think the source is biased or questionable.

The first thing a person does on these boards when they dissagree with a statement is question the source, no matter what it is. But the bottom line is, you simply cannot know for sure no mater who it comes from. There is as much credibility to this article than any other thats posted on these boads. In the end, you need to believe what you need to believe. But the source is no less credible than any other. period.

[edit on 9-5-2005 by skippytjc]

[edit on 9-5-2005 by skippytjc]



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:17 AM
link   
It only takes a quick glance that the front page to tell it's a right-leaning site.

The "Conservative T-Shirts!" ad on the home page is a good hint, the "news" items confirm it readily.



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:18 AM
link   
I believe the responsibility lies upon you, skippy, to prove that this is true. As it stands, it seems there aren't many hear who believe it. I think that speaks for itself, the argument presented by this article is hardly convincing.



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jamuhn
I believe the responsibility lies upon you, skippy, to prove that this is true. As it stands, it seems there aren't many hear who believe it. I think that speaks for itself, the argument presented by this article is hardly convincing.


If thre story was written by MSNBC or CNN would you say the same thing? How about Fox? No difference my friend.



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:31 AM
link   
Some very fine propaganda i must say myself......im still learning more and more about Joseph Goebbels and his propaganda machine and i thought i knew almost everything there was to know about it ....more information is still pending on theese sickos.....its really nice to see that there are some modern sicko spin meisters who have learned really well from one of the all time greats....!!!

Isnt it nice to know that there are still alot of gullible, myopic ,close minded ,indoctrinated people left in the world who lap this garbage up as if it made a lot of sense ???.......it just warms the heart.......soon the infinite will manifest as the 144,000 and the truth will be known,,,,,,The suppers ready people....

[edit on 9-5-2005 by suppers ready]



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:32 AM
link   
I think people need to make a decision here.

Some of you who posted above blasting the source of this article, were as recently as this past weekend taking a story from a liberal press source to be gospel.

Some of the same people posting in this thread complaining about the source, just yesterday were considering the Daily Mail to be a valid source of news.

But this story is not?

You see, if you're going to use political literature as "news" you need to be able to accept it from both sides. Using "just some" of them, the ones that you prefer, as news, and dismissing the others is an extraordinarily shallow way of thinking. It disappoints me to see that some people I've been posting with here for two years can think this way and consider themselves responsible thinkers.

If you want to dismiss both sides of tabloid journalism fine. If you want to understand that tabloids wish to sell papers at the cost of journalistic integrity, fine. Good, but be even handed about it.

Stop taking one sides tabloids as the word of god while mocking the other side. It's highly unbecoming.

[edit on 5-9-2005 by Djarums]



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by skippytjc
Can you document that?


skippy, it's already documented at frontpagemag.com and your choice of thread title only reinforces my own opinion.

Sanc'.



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by xmotex
Frontpagemag is another right wing "news" site like WND and NewsMax.

I'd take anything they say with several grains of salt - not that pederasty isn't tolerated in some Islamic cultures, it is (in some), but they are hardly unique in this regard.

The link to terrorism is iffy at best, where are all the ancient Greek suicide bombers? The article is a mishmash of overbroad generalizations, speculation, and imputational logic.

[edit on 5/9/05 by xmotex]


I guess we better don't believe anything that the left wing news sources say either then... So any progressive/liberal/socialist/communist website is biased and should be taken with large and several grains of salt.

I think there is something to this, but Islamic terrorism has mor profound reasons for it's existance. look at what the Muslims, including the prophet Mohammed used to do for a living, raiding caravans, taking women and even children as wifes and slaves, and beheading all the men in an entire caravan because they were infidels.....

The root of islamic terrorism is radical islam, and radical Islam is what Mohammed and the early Muslims followed as a religion.



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:41 AM
link   
Case in point.......
.....thats real nice coming from you djarums....youve found a way to smooth over what was said with out coming right out and saying you support the article whole heartedly.....im sure thats why they made you a Mod......good job....
lets just go ahead and be open minded and try to find the grains of truth in this insane piece of facist blogging......



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:43 AM
link   
Muadibb, have you read the Old Testament? The Muslim ancestors are not the only ones who have done such things. In fact, the world during that time was chaotic by today's standards.

There is much more to Islamic terror than the lives of their prophets. As we see, many Jewish prophets have done similar acts, and by extension, Christian prophets. Yet, we do not see the same level of terror in these two religions, therefore, violence in religious history does not necessitate violence among those religions today.

Islamic terror is an idealogy, a revolutionary idea, taking concepts from many Western philosophers. I hope to show more of this idealogy in days ahead, as an article I previously prepared was lost.



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:44 AM
link   
It's true that the molestation of young men is a problem in the MIddle East, but IMHO, that is not necessarily a direct cause for acts of terrorism, in particular, the ones that involving suicide attacks. I beleive that the suicide attacker has taken the idea that after a martyrs death, according to their teachings, a world of sexual gratification awaiting them, which is much more appealing than the revenge that is taken against the western civilisation. To me, that would be thier main objective. To get away from thier sexually oppressed world and live forever, satisfying the urges that they have been denied. Even the married men will find a more gratifying experience once they are dead, considering the women they will encounter in heaven will not have been living in the horrible conditions of filfth and stench as their wives have been forced to live in all their lives.

[edit on 9-5-2005 by mpeake]



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jamuhn
Muadibb, have you read the Old Testament? The Muslim ancestors are not the only ones who have done such things. In fact, the world during that time was chaotic by today's standards.

There is much more to Islamic terror than the lives of their prophets. As we see, many Jewish prophets have done similar acts, and by extension, Christian prophets. Yet, we do not see the same level of terror in these two religions, therefore, violence in religious history does not necessitate violence among those religions today.

Islamic terror is an idealogy, a revolutionary idea, taking concepts from many Western philosophers. I hope to show more of this idealogy in days ahead, as an article I previously prepared was lost.


an ideology that needs to be ended, just like the end of the Crusades and not more of the B.S. where Christians kill non-Christians because they do not share their religion. same thing for the Islamic fundamentalists.



posted on May, 9 2005 @ 11:46 AM
link   
And, looking a the topic of the thread I can't help thinking that it in itself is a stab at Islam in general. Terrorism exponent of abuse, wow.




top topics



 
0
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join