Memo: Bush manipulated US intel to fit his Iraqi agenda (moved from ATSNN), page 1

posted on May, 7 2005 @ 08:08 AM

link

A Top-Secret British memo reveals that President Bush decided to overthrow former president Saddam Hussein in the summer of 2002 and ensured that U.S. intelligence data supported his actions.

www.thestate.com
A highly classified British memo, leaked in the midst of Britain's just-concluded election campaign, indicates that President Bush decided to overthrow Iraqi President Saddam Hussein by summer 2002 and was determined to ensure that U.S. intelligence data supported his policy.

The document, which summarizes a July 23, 2002, meeting of British Prime Minister Tony Blair with his top security advisers, reports on a visit to Washington by the head of Britain's MI-6 intelligence service.

The visit took place while the Bush administration was still declaring to the American public that no decision had been made to go to war

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.

This is nothing new. David Icke called this nearly 11 years ago. It's a simple fact that when you manipulate information in order to support your personal agenda, the people subservient of this agenda are in trouble. Now we have to ask ourselves why exactly did President Bush want U.S. military intelligence to fit his Iraq policy?

Well first off, without this deception there would be no way that intelligence would gather enough evidence to justify a war.

This is big folks...

sanctum

posted on May, 7 2005 @ 08:16 AM

link

Covered in ATSNN here.

Sanc'.

Simulacra

posted on May, 7 2005 @ 08:21 AM

link

Sanctum, I believe these are seperate documents because they entail two completely different ideas regardless of if they were surfaced around the same time.

Terapin

posted on May, 7 2005 @ 08:38 AM

link

it is the same set of documents just a different spin looks like a repeat to me and we all knew Bush was a liar long ago.

mythatsabigprobe

posted on May, 7 2005 @ 08:39 AM

link

The newly disclosed memo, which was first reported by the Sunday Times of London, hasn't been disavowed by the British government. A spokesman for the British Embassy in Washington referred queries to another official, who didn't return calls for comment on Thursday.

Hmmmm... News services push the British Embassy for comments, somebody lobs a couple of homemade grenades into their front yard...

A message?

dgtempe

posted on May, 7 2005 @ 08:45 AM

link

This is correct old news

Simulacra

posted on May, 7 2005 @ 10:51 AM

link

This is correct old news

That's been undisputed.