It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by victor was right
"What is wrong with curfew laws? Hopefully you arent a parent because you dont hold the appropiate morals."
what's wrong with curfew laws?? you silly goose, because they seek to alienate me from what i HOPE you agree is an inalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
is it allright with you if certain people choose to pursue happiness after the curfew starts? and, if they interpet that term "liberty" to mean the simple freedom to go OUTDOORS onto the same street their parents tax dollars are subsidizing the upkeep of?
you are anti-libertarian. there are already laws against all the things delinquent kids do, but government lovers like YOU believe we don't have ENOUGH government authority in our lives and so you endorse these taliban-like legistlation laws.
i think it's just another shameless money grab by the state, disguised as "our wonderful government having our best interest in mind"
.....i wonder how much the fine is for violations???
Teenagers have no place being out past 10:30 (Which is the curfew in my town for teenagers) on schoolnights.
Originally posted by spliff4020
Sorry kids. I know ya hate it, but oh well. Thats why your a minor. You dont get to make the rules. Maybe one day, when your older and have your front window broken to the tune of $1500.or your new car keyed, you'll understand. It isnt a law meant to lock up kids comin home from work on a friday night. Its meant to be enforced when neccesary. And Im all for it. Should nail the neglegent parents to.
Originally posted by DeusEx
Not like it's unsafe, or the fact that night is when most crimes occur...
I love these people, screaming about how it's a basic, inailiable right for kids to do what they want, went they want. It's the police's fault they're not everywhere at once! It's the police's fault kids don't have limits, or parents have their heads up their asses!
Ahh, anok. Why don't you break a law, relax, and fund organized crime with a big, fat joint. Taking tools away from police only HELPS them! It doesn't matter that the age group MOST likely to commit crimes are males between 16 and 24!
First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.
Pastor Martin Niemöller
Originally posted by ANOK
Like I said it's also the parents fault. My point is the government always conveniently finds a way to use something people are scared of to enact more laws to restrict movement. It's really irrelevant that at this point it's kids they're restricting. It is relevant that it's another law enacted to restrict freedom of movement.
You seem to approve of this behaviour yet I am pretty sure you believe you live in a free country right, Dues?
Or is it just freedom for those we deem fit?
Oh noes, not our freedom of movement! Really, the legit reasons for a fifteen year old to be walking around are pretty few. This isn't about freedom, it's about irresponsibility. When I was that age, I wasn't out at those times, even during the summer, because there was no good reason to be. I approve of this behavior because I can see the reasoning behind it, and because I respect rule of law. Face the facts- you have a time when criminal acts are more likely to occur, so why not try to prevent crime by not giving people an opportunity to actually COMMIT those crimes? To me, there is little difference between having the freedom to do soemthing and not doing it, and not having that liberty at all.
Throughout history people under 16 have been allowed out of doors after midnight. Also throughout history adults have been allowed out after midnight. Throughout history which group has done the most damage to Human safety?
And BTW it's you that sounds like they're screaming. Predictable, can't see the forest, reactionary screaming.
Throughout history, it's been proven that people are idiots. They are irresponsible, violent, and greedy. Especially so are the youth of any given age. Fact of the matter is that most adults don't abuse the priviledge, and neither do the elderly. Like I said, the age group most likely to commit criminal offences are males between the ages of sixteen and twenty-four, so any method to deter this age group from emerging at a high risk time will drop the crime rate. The fact that your argument centers on comparing 'adults' - a relatively large group of people who contribute to society, and are thought of as being capable of making decisions for themselves- and minors, who are in the laws eye, immature. The gross size difference is also an issue, sicne an adult is anyone between 18 and 65. Look at the stastics: by far, the most likely offenders are those between 15-19, followed by those between 20-29. It is also interesting that the msot common victims of firearm homicide are those between the ages of 18-24.
LINK: caag.state.ca.us...
Are you making the assumption that I support criminal activities because I don't see the wisdom in your government enforced control?
Like I said in my first post, this curfew is not about protecting the population it's about control of the population.
There are better ways to enforce the law than locking everybody up.
Who's next?
I am making the assumption that you support criminal activity because you are clearly against any police or governmental control on the citizenry. yes, there is a control fact involved in a curfew, but fact of the matter is that a certain amount of control is needed. Control is the basis of society. There are better ways to enforce the law, I'm sure. We just either haven't found them, or can't use them.
If we keep on bailing out the basement without fixing the holes then eventually we are gonna drown in our own #...
Why not pick out the people reveling in it? People profit every day from suffering. You won't get chopped out for your shoes in broad daylight, and bikers and gangs wouldn't have so much money if people would stop buying drugs. Society is going down the tubes because no one is willing to take any responsibility, and all pass the buck. Eventually, it ends up in the government's lap. The police have to take up the slack because wants to get out and get drunk in the dead of night, and yet they are the bad ones. Why not actually say "Yes, I'm a parent, my kids should be home by a certain time. "
I know you've seen this before but maybe you forgot:
First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.
Pastor Martin Niemöller
Yeah, really, that would apply if we were living in a fascist state. I'm sorry to ruin your whole anarchist paradigm, but this is the West. Democracy. Police aren't dragging people out of their homes and shooting them. There is no ethnic cleansing. There is no Hitler youth, and book burning only happens in the South. What we've become is a society of loudmouth whiners. Spare the rod, spoil the child works on a societal level too.
DE
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
You mean, "...you're...", rather than "..your...."? I hope you aren't teaching them grammar at 2200hrs!
Sorry, I know that was mean, but I couldn't help it. Please, forgive me for not being sensitive.
There needs to be more information, obviously. Is there a noise problem, a crime problem, a delinquency problem in your town? Many more questions have to be answered before I weigh in one one side of the other.
I will say this, though; juvenile curfews have been around for a long, long time. While I usually err on the side of individual rights, it must be pointed out that juveniles do not have such rights and the municipality may enforce such city ordinances without violating the constitution. Fact of the matter is, kids should have discipline and be under supervision instead of running the streets after a decent hour. They are not mature enough to stay out of trouble.