What a nice article just check this out:
"This democracy has perfected for itself a fabrication of its inconceivable enemy: terrorism. In effect, this democracy wants to be judged more by
its enemies than by its results. The history of terrorism is written by the State, and is therefore very educational. The masses of spectators can
never be allowed to know everything about terrorism, but they must nevertheless be told enough so that they are persuaded that -- compared to
terrorism -- everything else appears to be more acceptable and in every case more rational and more democratic [...] The secret dominates this world,
and primarily as the secret of domination." -- Guy Debord, Commentaries on the Society of the Spectacle, 1988.
"It remains to be said that people are naturally changeable and it is easy to persuade them of something, but it is difficult to strengthen their
degree of persuasion; it is necessary that things be so arranged that, if there are those who do not believe, one can persuade them by the use of
force." Machiavelli, The Prince.
In this society that is in an advanced state of decomposition, terrorism has proved itself to be a means by which power strengthens itself or simply
maintains its existence.
The practice of terrorism is both modern and archaic. It responds to precise requirements when public order is menaced by social forces that appear to
be incontrollable. Without going as far back as Nero -- who, in 64 A.D., burned all of Rome so as to persecute the Christians who, claiming equality
for all before God, menaced the foundations of Roman civilization (i.e., slavery) -- we can recall that terrorist strikes planned in high places have
marked the entire history of the 20th century. And these strikes haven't lacked originality as far as form is concerned, for they always have the
same purpose. From the direct manipulation of Russian terrorists by the Okhrana, the Czar's secret police, at the beginning of the 20th century, to
the kidnapping and assassination of Aldo Moro in 1978 by the teleguided Red Brigades; from the burning of the Reichstag (staged by Goebbels in 1933)
to the police bombs in the Piazza Fontana in Milan in 1969 -- all the acts of spectacular terrorism have as their common objectives the silencing of
the opposition, the justification of the imprisonment or killing of dissidents, the rallying of frightened populations to existing power, and the
consolidation of generalized oppression.
All of these operations spread fear, feed unverifiable rumors, sustain the use of paid informants, train their abused spectators in the most servile
behaviors, and extend the special powers devoted to the services of control and surveillance. In each of the cases cited above, the "guilty parties"
were evidently those who were the easiest to give up to the furious public, whose responses had already been conditioned. The "mysteries" that
nevertheless enveloped each of these acts of war were also and simultaneously presented as impenetrable, that is, until changes in the administration
of affairs made it possible to reveal the plausible nature of the truly guilty parties to the mystified public, but, as one says, after it was too
late.
Rest of the article:
www.notbored.org...
Want to read the Prince By Nicolo Machiavelli:
www.ibiblio.org...
Enjoy the reading.
[Edited on 30-7-2003 by CoLD aNGeR]