It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Can you TELL ME .. why ice crystals form SO MUCH now a days and why the WHOLE SKY gets painted with them.. when that USE to NOT happen until about 1990?
btw this morning BBC TV broadcast a film of military aircraft producing what appeared to be normal contrails but which in a later shot were seen to be spreading across the sky in typical 'chemtrail' fashion ... The film was taken during the Battle of Britain
"Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous States have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Greys and all the odious apparatus of NWO rule, we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in the Forums, we shall fight in the chat-rooms and through U2Us, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in cyberspace, we shall defend our nutburg beliefs, whatever the cost to logic or common sense may be, we shall fight on the Chem-threads, we shall fight in the midnight talk shows, we shall fight in the anonymous letters to the editors and with insults to scientists; we shall squirt them back with anti-chem-trail chem-busters, we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this theory or a large part of it were subjugated and made into a deserving laughing stock, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the brave chem-a-zoids of every nationality, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the Atlanteans and the Spaceship Guys from Niburu, with all their power and might, step forth to the rescue and the liberation of the nutbars.
Originally posted by apc
Way to go ANOK. You just gave props to someone who was either blind in the 80's, or a fetus.
Well thank you apc but sorry, whether Vis Mega was blind or a fetas in the 80's is irrelevant. I was applauding Vis Megas' incredible put-down.
Vis Mega is obviously not a fetus or blind now.
It’s ANFO, not AGRO, and yes, you’d be a suspect. But that’s not because you did it, it’s because the cops are paranoid.
Whom did you pay for your spell checker? You should get your money back LOL!
Soap-Box, actually. And yes, “chem-trails” are a pet peeve of mine, because the whole talk about them, in addition to being a cruel hoax believed by well-meaning but ignorant people, is a deliberate slap to my profession, my employer, the military of which I am a proud veteran, and my country.
I do appreciate that there are atmospheric conditions that can cause trails to stay around... but "FILL A SKY"? come on now...
if that is just contrails... then they need to do something about all that pollution... If I wanted to live in a cloudy part of the country, I would move to alaska. I live in Oklahoma, where if you don't like the weather, wait 5 minutes... it will blow right over (except for these)...
1. So, can you attest that a few planes leaving contrails would literally fill a sky, and thicken... and not leave an effect on our environment? (con or chem)
2. Can you also attest that there are common weather control experiments being conducted by airplanes in out in the open experiments and processes?
(i can introduce you to a few cloud seeders if you want... nice farmer types)
3. Can you also attest that there are air dispersal experiments being done, with pesticides, funguscides and other agents (including lightly radioactive powders to study the spread of a "cropduster type terror attack") That would technically be called "chemtrails"? (in the news all the time)
OTS, these are all facts... ones that can slap you in the face... and you know it...
so lets start here, and see if there might be any other devious "not so open" studies being done with fuel additives to allow planes to have more persistant smog/con trails than usual...
probably for the purpose of affecting the weather... which is already being done openly by universities and labs,
so is that such a strech?
So what else is new? I have seen condensation trails turn a clear sky into an overcast sky myself. And I have explained, in agonizing detail, exactly why it happens and it is a perfectly normal occurrence which follow exactly the basic laws of physics, and I have done it at least a hundred times, half of which were on this very forum.
Something that always makes me wonder about "chem-trails" is why don't "they" just simply do it on overcast days?
No one would notice then would they?
You know, that panic thing they worry about?
This statement makes Vis's entire argument not even worth acknolwedgement in my opinion.
Off_The_Street you know, you're alright, I like ya.. even if you are a skeptical jerk who equates himself with James Randi. Why do you do that btw.. are you celebate [sic] too?
“Get what I mean?”
”…chicks dig guys who are in to flakey stuff.. trust me. Do you have any idea how easy it is to get laid these days with the pick up line..."Whats [sic] your sign?" It probablly [sic] works better now then it did 20 years ago.”
Because you see, then I have to take up space to correct you. And this just gets repetiative [sic] and wastefull [sic] after awhile, you know? And THIS.. THIS.. this is just embarrassing [sic].
Falling back on the old, "My spelling is better then your spelling." internet debating tactic? Man, I mean I DID think you were smart.. (not as smart as me.. or as smart as you THINK you are) but now.. I dunno man.”
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
Vis says:
Off_The_Street you know, you're alright, I like ya.. even if you are a skeptical jerk who equates himself with James Randi. Why do you do that btw.. are you celebate [sic] too?
This is kind of a grownup forum; most of the grownups here try to avoid insulting terms like “jerk”. And why are you so interested in my sex life?
“Get what I mean?”
Well I'm not actually.. I was trying to be funny.. you know.. funny?
Because I look at a guy like Randi and I think... "There is a guy who can't have ANY damn fun at all."
And that is just the way I feel about skeptics in general.
I don't really think you serve any funtion in our society. You just ramble on about WHAT IS known to modern science and everything else doesn't count.
Now this has gotten personal because you can't take a joke. K.. cool no problem.
What was this topic about anyways?
”…chicks dig guys who are in to flakey stuff.. trust me. Do you have any idea how easy it is to get laid these days with the pick up line..."Whats [sic] your sign?" It probablly [sic] works better now then it did 20 years ago.”
So you do this “flakey stuff” to pick up women? You need that? How déclassé.
Because you see, then I have to take up space to correct you. And this just gets repetiative [sic] and wastefull [sic] after awhile, you know? And THIS.. THIS.. this is just embarrassing [sic].
Falling back on the old, "My spelling is better then your spelling." internet debating tactic? Man, I mean I DID think you were smart.. (not as smart as me.. or as smart as you THINK you are) but now.. I dunno man.”
Yes you got it. Humor man. Just humor. Just trying to have fun. I'll quit right now.
See THIS is what I was talking about skeptics being cold and heartless and not being able to joke and have a time about anything.
Do you REALLY THINK that I decided to cut up your sex life?
REALLY?!
You know what actually.. I guess it comes down to that type of stuff REALLY DOES go on here so much that when someone ribs you a little (which is why I said "I like you" okay.. I was having fun with you).
But really.. this is just agravating now.
And I have to install a word processor.. so.. GOT BETTER THINGS TO DO!
:ppppPPpppPPpp
(that was a raspberry btw)
Off_The_Street you know, you're alright, I like ya.. even if you are a skeptical jerk who equates himself with James Randi. Why do you do that btw.. are you celebate [sic] too?