It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Two decades later, the Iraqi military issued its troops an Arabic version of the same manual, copying not only the wording but also many of the drawings. Dated March 1987 and stamped "confidential," the manual includes a message from Saddam Hussein, then Iraq's supreme ruler, underscoring the importance of perpetual learning.
Roadside bombs -- the military calls them "improvised explosive devices," or IEDs -- continue to rank as the number one killer of U.S. troops in Iraq, according to Pentagon figures. About half of all combat casualties in Iraq are attributed to them.
Countering them has become a top Pentagon priority. At the Army's Communications-Electronics Command here, more than 80 engineers and other specialists are engaged in the effort. Throughout the military, dozens more also are working on the problem, with hundreds of millions of dollars now devoted to the project, defense officials said.
"This is a long-term threat, not just to our armed forces but I think to our citizens," Gordon R. England told a Senate panel last week at a hearing on his nomination to become deputy secretary of defense. "If there's ever an attack, it will be this kind of attack -- or potentially this kind of an attack -- in America."
Originally posted by demosthenes
Thats why we need heavier humvees. Those IEDs are killing our boys. And I'm sure that we can find some way of stopping them. If you haven't noticed the attacks on U.S. Forces have been declining. But the down fall to this is that the civilians in Iraq are starting to get more of the attacks. Which is stupid because they're killing other Muslims. Isn't that a bad thing in their Gods eyes.
Originally posted by truthseeka
You gotta love the irony here. And, it is true that the Hummers need better armor, but don't you tell that to the people in charge, though. I heard about an attack when our forces received most of their injuries to the upper body while riding in a Humvee.
I guess the insurgents aren't going away for a while, but that's exactly what the White House wants.
I dont think Hummmers really stand a change against IED's - they can get Abrams tank blown away.
Originally posted by dbates
Sure, everyone wants to copy the best, but they are using outdated war booklets for fighting a modern war. It's not going to work very well for them. I wouldn't be too frightened of an enemy that was using techniques from 20 years ago. Even if they have some limited success, they don't have the resources that the US does. Just as an example watch as the US uses modern weaponry to remove insurgents hiding behind a car. Which method was more effect? The one from 20 years ago, or the new modern approach?
Originally posted by SportyMB
I dont think Hummmers really stand a change against IED's - they can get Abrams tank blown away.
What are you baseing this on???? Hey did you make this up???
Are you basing this on experience or what???
Yeah SOME, a very few IED can blow away tanks. But "hummmers" as you like to call em are made to withstand a certain degree of explosion. Even the "non-armored" regular ones can take a grenade exploding beneath it....sure the engine block and the back is gone, but the troops are still alive and that's all that matters, that what it is designed to protect.
But you don't care about the troops do you?
But as in some unfortunate cases the whole thing goes and people die, both US and Iraqi, truly sad.
But you can never have too much armor, MORE ARMOR, MORE ARMOR!!
Originally posted by SportyMB
What are you baseing this on???? Hey did you make this up???
Are you basing this on experience or what???
Yeah SOME, a very few IED can blow away tanks. But "hummmers" as you like to call em are made to withstand a certain degree of explosion. Even the "non-armored" regular ones can take a grenade exploding beneath it....sure the engine block and the back is gone, but the troops are still alive and that's all that matters, that what it is designed to protect.
But you don't care about the troops do you?
But as in some unfortunate cases the whole thing goes and people die, both US and Iraqi, truly sad.
But you can never have too much armor, MORE ARMOR, MORE ARMOR!!
WASHINGTON — The U.S. military's Abrams tank, designed during the Cold War to withstand the fiercest blows from the best Soviet tanks, is getting knocked out at surprising rates by the low-tech bombs and rocket-propelled grenades of Iraqi insurgents.
n the all-out battles of the 1991 Gulf War, only 18 Abrams tanks were lost and no soldiers in them killed. But since the March 2003 invasion of Iraq, with tanks in daily combat against the unexpectedly fierce insurgency, the Army says 80 of the 69-ton behemoths have been damaged so badly they had to be shipped back to the United States.
A favorite tactic: detonating a roadside bomb in hopes of blowing the tread off the tank. The insurgents follow with rocket-propelled grenades, mortars and gunfire aimed at the less-armored areas, especially the vulnerable rear engine compartment.
source:
usa.today.com
And to answer your quesiton, where did I get the information about the Abrams tank being blow away, here it is:
Yeah SOME, a very few IED can blow away tanks
More Armor will not help the situation. More Armor will only result in More Strong IED's.
Originally posted by SportyMB
And to answer your quesiton, where did I get the information about the Abrams tank being blow away, here it is:
Yeah no crap, I know IED's can blow a tank, I acknowledged that in my last post...
quote: Originally posted by SportyMB
Yeah SOME, a very few IED can blow away tanks
Ok this is about the stupidest comment Ive heard in awhile, just plain stupid
More Armor will not help the situation. More Armor will only result in More Strong IED's.
Hey I have a great idea.....Let's not issue bullet proof vest to our cops, cause the bullets will only get better!!!!
Wow your logic is all jacked up! Anyways, Yeah the IED's will get better but they are going to make them better regardless. Why?
Kill more people-
greater blast radius-
Psychological damage to viewers-
More bang for the buck-
We should still prepare and equip ourselves as best as we can, more armor for "hummers", better rifles for killing and better training.
We still stand a better chance in an armored "Hummer" than we do in a non armored one.
Originally posted by Eyeofhorus
Did these insurgents inherit the teachings from us when we aided out former ally, against the war on communism (al queda)?
Originally posted by Souljah
FORT MONMOUTH, N.J., May 3, 2005 -- In 1965, the U.S. Army published a detailed manual on how to build and hide booby traps, complete with detailed diagrams illustrating various means of wiring detonators to explosives, and advising on the best locations for concealing the deadly bombs along roadways and elsewhere.
that the US Forces seem to have problems with these explosive devices, which they invented in the First Place! Thats what puzzles me. If they invented them, they should know the best way to disarm them, isnt that so?