It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The earth was not created in seven days

page: 4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in


posted on Jul, 26 2009 @ 09:45 PM
Did you know this, about the Theory of Light ?

We all know the demonstration, of the theoretical splitting of Light,
in our School General Science syllabus.

But did you know, what the Truth is, regarding this demonstration?
If we consider the demonstration....

But did you know if we open up the Slit, we find this ?

Note; the Green (a mixture of Yellow and Blue)
has disappeared, and Two sets of colours are Left.

The White Light, between the Two sets of Colours,
are Not split by the Prism!

And if we consider only one edge of the Slit, in the orientation, seen
in the next drawing we get this!

Now Invert this Edge!

And we see.....

We find that Yellow turns to Blue and Red to Violet ???

If we Invert the Prism instead of the Edge the same occurs !

And did you know, it does Not matter, which side of the Slit
or Edge is in relation to the Prism (input or Output), the same still occurs !

No matter what the accepted theory of Light is today,
this Phenomena shown above, still remains and requires,
New answers, and New understanding...

Are You still convinced that Light has Wavelength ???

Or is there another more plausible Theory, to Light
yet Not understood.

Or is the Truth being hidden from us for some reason ???

Try this demonstration yourself, before you make any comment.....

Perhaps Blue is Opposite Yellow ???

And Complimentary Colours (a colour and its Complimentary colour)
are Opposites ?

If we mix "Black" and "White" we get Grey.

If we Alternate between Black and White, as in the Case of a rotating Disc,
Rotating slowly, having Half of the disc Black, and the other half White,
we see Pale Yellow along with another Phenomena
which I will discuss Later on in another Thread....

Perhaps we need to Update our knowledge, regarding Light
and Colour, by revisiting the Old theory and re examine it again....

Or are we just going to remain blind, and pretend, by keeping
that Slit narrow, Not researching this again ???

Or are we going to take another 21st Century look,
at the Theory of Light ???

This is just too Important to ignore, as the Theory of Light
underpins most Science today, and our understanding of the Universe!

Sorry have posted this to the wrong thread, but I will leave it here anyway.

[edit on 26-7-2009 by The Matrix Traveller]

posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 02:31 PM
Let me throw my two cents into the thread.

Genesis 1:1 says "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Now think about that for a minute. Seriously, just sit and think on that for a full sixty seconds...

...have you thought about it? If God created both the "heavens" and the "earth" then it seems perfectly logical that the sun was part of the "heavens." Why is this? Well, if you look up the definition of heavens you see that it means "The sky or universe as seen from the earth." What do you see when you look up at the sky? At night, stars. During the day, the sun.

It is not inconceivable that God had already created the stars, galaxies, moon, sun, planets, comets, etc. all on the same "day" as the earth. If you read the scripture it's entirely possible. Especially since "heavens" is plural, and not singular. More than one "thing" was created as far as the heavens are concerned.

[edit on 27-7-2009 by one_enlightened_mind]

[edit on 27-7-2009 by one_enlightened_mind]

posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 04:54 PM
reply to post by one_enlightened_mind

It is excellent that you are asking questions in yourself...

It is Not my intention, to offend you in any way by saying, read the book again, Slower this time noting every step of the story.

But keep in mind what is written in The Gospel of Thomas.


39. Jesus said,

“The Pharisees and the Scribes
have taken The Keys of Knowledge
and Hidden Them.

They themselves have NOT entered,
nor have they allowed to enter
those who wish to".

The sky is Not the Only Heaven, if you read.

First the Heaven was Created... Then the Earth.... Then the other Heaven, Sun, Moon and Stars!

This Heaven, The First Heaven is Not the Sky!

This First Heaven, is where the whole experience is created IN!

Note; this heaven is created out of the face of the deep which is Not the sea or any other water on Earth, as at this stage in the story the Earth had No Form and was Void.

If the Earth was Void (without Dimension) how could you have seas or anything on Earth ???

The words used are "Void and without Form"!

Further on in the book it tells you about the other heaven that involves the Sun Moon and Stars.

Just think about it for a moment without reading it as you want it to mean.

Open your Mind and read again very carefully drawing down each stage in picture form as it describes, don't try and translate into your understanding but just try and draw each step in its own frame according to the description in the writing.

If you do this it will amaze you in what you shall discover.

The whole experience is created in a Face or Plane which is formed by the second action of Life or sometimes called Awareness, Consciousness or Mind.

Note; The order of Creation, is the Heaven then The Earth, Sun, Moon and Stars.

Note also, the Day mentioned was NOT morning to Evening as described later on with regard to the Earth.

The Day mentioned is from Evening to Morning which is the period of Night on Earth and Not the day.

The Night is called Darkness on Earth and The Light the Day!

But in the beginning it says, there was DARKNESS this is from Evening to morning as it is written.

Darkness is "Lack of Contrast" Not Blackness....

I wish you Good Fortune, with your enquiries...

I am in no doubt at all, you will be rewarded with the answers, you diligently seek...

posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 05:33 PM
reply to post by saint4God

He's referring to an awesome Rickey Gervais stand up where Gervais teaches us the inner secrets of the book of Genesis - specifically - that god did all that magnificent work in the dark and then made light "to have a look".

However, in retrospect "personally, I think the snake was a mistake."

posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 05:42 PM
reply to post by sjn240785

I totally agree with you - sad thing is, the only responses your going to find to a post like that (of which I have done several) are born-again wannabe theologians expressing "prophecy" and scripture as evidence for their claims; and as refutation to your post. See Matrix Traveller for a perfect example.
Anyways man, yes I wish people weren't so delusional, but what has wishing ever done for us?

"In his classic 1946 essay Politics and the English Language, George Orwell explains why so much of political writing is vague and cloudy: "[P]olitical speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible…Political language…is designed to make lies sound truthful and…to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." Theology is also the attempt to justify the unjustifiable and this naturally leads to convoluted language whose meaning and implications are hard to pin down. You can replace the word 'political' with 'theological' in the Orwell passage and you would get a good description of the writings of religious apologists."

I guess I missed the memo, but 'earth was created in 7 days' is in the it must be true.

[edit on 28-7-2009 by makinho21]

posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 07:31 PM
To makinho21...

It is a great honour to be called one of your respected foes..

I have obviously had an impact on you, even though if negative, it will still have an effect on your reasoning and shall produce the necessary fruit in the end.

Good fortune with you development, in the future...


posted on Jul, 30 2009 @ 06:06 PM
Meh... in the genesis, a day is a billion years for the Universe. But for some reason, a day became a day later on.

posted on Jul, 30 2009 @ 10:44 PM
reply to post by die_another_day

Maybe I have misted something here.

Where does it tell you this (about the million years) in the writings ????

I am always willing to learn....

posted on Jul, 31 2009 @ 05:55 AM
Because day might've meant the "mean solar day," the average time it took for Earth to rotate in its axis, and not the "solar day," a division of time equal to the time it takes to return to the position it was in to the sun; Earth might've rotated in its axis without the sun.

posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 05:30 AM
Its hard to tell no matter how much evidence there is. ancient evidence is really not evidence at all

posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 03:24 PM

Originally posted by daveslaine
Its hard to tell no matter how much evidence there is. ancient evidence is really not evidence at all

Ancient evidence is only as accurate, as ones understanding of their roots.

The same applies to to-days knowledge.

Knowledge has two ends.

a. Truth.


b. Fertiliser.

All knowledge is Not necessarily Truthful or factual.

posted on Aug, 29 2009 @ 08:33 AM
That's a really good question. I guess it's just another contradiction in the Bible.

top topics

<< 1  2  3   >>

log in