Originally posted by Hellmutt
If the US "owns" the moon...
...then Norway should "own" the Arctic and the Antarctica.
Good point ... and the Native American's should own the US ...
The reality is that currently there is no value to owning the moon. If there ever were to be added value, such as finding minerals, I'm sure there
would be a struggle for ownership between any parties that could actually afford to build a colony there.
According to dictionary dot com, "ownership" means:
Legal right to the possession of a thing.
So ownership of the moon would come down to establishing legal rights for owning the moon. Whose jurisdiction is the moon?
Sure we've been there, and so have the Russians, and the Chinese are planning on it as well. We left some junk there.
The real question is, could we defend it if it were attacked by space aliens?
I think land ownership, privately, depends on a legal system of a nation or collective of nations. However, a violation of this ownership, would
subsequently require some sort of action or retribution by this nation or collective.
Since we do not have a treaty (like NATO) to defend the moon against some sort of enemy, I would say no one owns the moon, just like no one owns the
Mariana trench at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean ... who would possibly want to defend it?
Naturally that might change if they discovered gold, etc. However, it's been estimated that while the likelihood of discovering mineral wealth on
planets and asteroids may in fact be good, the cost of actually getting it and bringing it back to Earth, is far greater than it is to get it locally,
so the point is moot.