It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm surprised that anyone puts any credibility in Lazar, really.
Originally posted by Byrd
I'm surprised that anyone puts any credibility in Lazar, really. He has a lot of loony notions and this one is perhaps the most absurd; a riff on the "play this song backwards and you'll hear the formula for Invisible Ink!" nonsense that was going around in the 1960's.]
Originally posted by SkipShipman
Surely Lazar might be easy to dismiss, just as his story indicates his identity erasure, except for a Los Alamos telephone book. Try as they might, these people did not get to every last phone book to obliterate his indicated presence. Who else explains too many things so well?
Originally posted by Dr Love
Originally posted by SkipShipman
Surely Lazar might be easy to dismiss, just as his story indicates his identity erasure, except for a Los Alamos telephone book. Try as they might, these people did not get to every last phone book to obliterate his indicated presence. Who else explains too many things so well?
I agree with you Skip. There's something very genuine about parts of his story. Some parts could be real and some parts could be disinformation, thus making him a disinformation agent, but as far as him explaining how UFOs propel themselves, I believe he's telling the truth.
Peace
Originally posted by SkipShipman
Please explain what "loony notions," cite some examples.
I think the question here is about a holographic projection of human history, something these space aliens sampled and recorded.
Surely Lazar might be easy to dismiss, just as his story indicates his identity erasure, except for a Los Alamos telephone book. Try as they might, these people did not get to every last phone book to obliterate his indicated presence. Who else explains too many things so well?