It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I love it when people make idiots of themselves
Originally posted by xu
obviously thats not a butterfly.
now I will tell you my opinions on this, but this doesnt mean those are absolute truth, just the things that I tend to think or ask, so dont get me wrong.
the footage: well it looks better then most, it has the moon in it, the treetops, and a shape to the light, so we have something more than a white shaking dot on black. and the objects motion is visible. its headed to a direction and moving in a "steady" speed. from the video as I see it, it can be two things;
a plane that is steadily moving at a low attitude, but we can see the bottom plating of the plane which is illuminated by its lights,and possibly we see the lights also
or an unidentified flying object which is moving at a steady speed in a fixed direction.
so I assume these two are equally possible. but then I start to question other facts;
you tell that you went outside to have a smoke and continued to detail how things happened but you forgot to mention at which part you took your camera out to shoot this object. or do you always keep your camera attached to your belt?
from the above question (and after visiting your link) I answer to myself; he is a ufo hunter, this is his specialization so I must distinguish an ordinary man recording a video of ufo while going out for a smoke and an ufo-hunterperson which records a footage while he goes out for a smoke.
then from the above, I think about the concept "ufo-hunting", so these people go out and record unidentified flying objects, this is their "job". after I visit you site I see various footage which "look-like" ufos (unidentified things), I see lots of advertisements, bot google pay per click, and banners which could be pay-per-view I am not sure. so then it is a fact that the author of site wants more and more visitors to view their site, (otherwise what are those ads for). and to maintain the continuation of these visits webmaster has to present new content by adding to the site, which in this case more videos of unidentified flying object photos. so for you there is a "need" for creating new ufo videos, you want to record an ufo to begin with. and these are huge negative facts for teh reliablity your findings, beacuse I think that if someone self-motivates themselves to record ufo videos then they obviously will and can.
continuing from the above, let alone the ads at your site you even have ads in this post, your videos name contains your name, you direct this pages visitor to check more content from your webpage, and you have the link to your webpage. (these are my thoughts only, take it easy)
you say any photo experts can why this cant be a plane and helicopter, so by this statement you disqualify anyone who states that this is a plane is not a photo-expert. which sounds biased to me. let me tell you I have seen planes in the night that probably if you recorded them they would be right on your web site already. so there is still possiblity for this object to be a plane, and there is still possibility of this object to be an ufo also. but what you present in your footage could be very well a plane, you tell that it hovered stopped,changed direction, played hide and seek etc. although none is visible in your footage, a moving white object which seems is at a fixed speed on a fixed direction, which is sometimes obstructed by the trees, also you change your position while recording it. so I could tell that it could very well be a plane by watching the footage.
it could be identified as a plane or it could very well be un-identified. but after viewing the big picture as I stated above I go for the plane etc. this is how I see this. I could be wrong.
Originally posted by MCory1
You're right. It's a UFO. I don't see any reason to believe it's extraterrestrial in nature though. It is unidentified, but that's about it. And you can debate with someone without resorting to name calling, and still not be candy coating it.
Originally posted by GArnold
I grew up in New Hampshire and it is where I saw my one and only UFO( near Exeter..) so I know they are there and I am 100% sure of this. But I am with some of the other posters here ... its very difficult for me to say this is a "Awesome" UFO video. Some of the other videos on your site seemed a little better than this.
Originally posted by Dr Love
Look dude, the video's alright, but it's certainly not something to go berserk over!!
Personally, it looks like a helicopter using a searchlight to me.
Originally posted by Dr Love
If there's one person on this forum that will give anything the benefit of the doubt until the very end, it's me!! I just get irritated by the videos that show a shaky light in the sky at night. I guarantee you that most people who've watched the video didn't even reply because there's nothing to reply about. Videos like that are a dime a dozen. You have to bring something more to the table at ATS or you're gonna get trampled.
It very well may be a UFO, but there's not enough there.
Originally posted by nhufohunter
Everybody is always talking about how shaky the videos are, does anyone have a clue to how hard it is to first find a UFO much less get it on film, and then try and get it to pose for the camera and come close enough so you don't have to use zoom to see it. When the objects are even a small distance away it makes much harder to keep it in the center of the screen, go film some planes or stars tonight and you'll see.
[edit on 22-4-2005 by nhufohunter]
Originally posted by Dr Love
The link you gave is not working for me.
Originally posted by sanctum
Dr Love, maybe we broke his server.
Google paul spera