Bigfoot filmed in Manitoba, page 5

privacy

Pages: << 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times

reply posted on 2-5-2005 @ 08:12 PM by Dulcimer

I just want to see this already. I checked my quide, I dont get the television show it will be on.

reply posted on 2-5-2005 @ 11:08 PM by AndrewTB

Guys

. Good news! Im recording the episode and will be hosting it somehow. If anyone has a server to share let me know via U2U. I saw a preview of Current Affair and the so called AMAZING Footage! It just looked liked a pixelated turd. I honestly hope this isnt what ive been waiting for

reply posted on 3-5-2005 @ 12:11 AM by AndrewTB

I honestly hope this isnt it

. www.exn.ca...

reply posted on 3-5-2005 @ 12:26 AM by GArnold

I hope your kidding with the last post the link takes you to the story .. "Is this the long-sought Sasquatch? Jay Ingram unveils dramatic new video! Video
By Jay Ingram and David Newland, May 22, 2002" .. this is several years old and certainly not the newest footage from Manitoba. I havent seen any image of any kind from the new footage but this for sure is not it!

[edit on 3-5-2005 by GArnold]

reply posted on 3-5-2005 @ 02:22 AM by AndrewTB

I wasnt joking. It looked a bit similiar to the snip they showed on the tv of the new footage. Ill be recording it for everyone tommorrow.

EDIT: I JUST REALIZED THE DATE :O MAJOR BRAIN FART!

[edit on 5/3/2005 by AndrewTB]

reply posted on 3-5-2005 @ 12:04 PM by w1kdtr1p

Looking good! Can't wait to see the new footage.

reply posted on 3-5-2005 @ 12:42 PM by Dr Love

Ask yourself why the Discovery Channel website would even post this picture:

A Current Affair would not buy a video containing garbage like this, so what's it's purpose? This picture and the accompanying video are meant to plant a seed in everybody's mind that whatever we end up seeing in this Manitoba video is fake. Once again, it's psychology 101. The masses are being pre-conditioned before they ever even get to see the Manitoba video.

Besides the fact that the Discovery Channel Bigfoot obviously looks like a guy in an ape suit and is shorter than the Patterson bigfoot, notice in the Discovery Channel video how the creature's movements are strikingly similar to the creature in the old Patterson video. This is a set-up by those who want the public to continue to believe that Bigfoot doesn't exist. I seriously question the Discovery Channel and wonder who's really pulling the strings over there.

Because of this one picture and the accompanying video, I believe that 'they' know that the creature in the Manitoba video is real.

Peace

[edit on 3-5-2005 by Dr Love]

reply posted on 3-5-2005 @ 02:13 PM by skychief

That Discovery Channel pic has to be a joke as it clearly shows a man in an ape suit. I can't wait for Andrew to host this video though so i can get a glimpse at this animal.

reply posted on 3-5-2005 @ 04:41 PM by andpau66

CALGARY -- The Canadian sasquatch story -- complete with video of a massive, hairy beast -- will air tomorrow night on A Current Affair, the granddaddy of American tabloid television, the Fox network said.

However, since the program broadcasts only in the United States, Canadians without special cable service or satellite who are interested in catching a glimpse of the video that grabbed headlines around the world will have to be content with watching a snippet of Northern Manitoba's supposed sasquatch on the Internet (www.acurrentaffair.com... ttp://www.acurrentaffair.com>).

The network said yesterday that its bigfoot segment will be posted on its website for international viewers on Thursday.

Continue reading...

"[It is] a dark, upright, primate figure, with arms and legs somewhat like a human, standing on a riverbank," he writes.

"[It is] either a human or a sasquatch, but among those two candidates it is not clearly one or the other, due to the blurriness of the footage."

Im sure the footage is not going to stop the world and make everyone say "wow". It's probably going to be like every other "bigfoot" video.

[edit on 3-5-2005 by andpau66]

reply posted on 3-5-2005 @ 05:30 PM by scar

It's very blurry

reply posted on 3-5-2005 @ 06:45 PM by w1kdtr1p

Sorry Scar... that doesn't do much for me.

nice windows though!

[edit on 5/3/05 by w1kdtr1p]

reply posted on 3-5-2005 @ 07:28 PM by scar

Sorry for the fuzzy blobsquatch still pic, i have a couple more, but i'm afraid the quality is not much better.

I wonder if they are saving the best for tomorrow?

Watching the clip though was a bit better, it's arms swaying and it's long stride, slumbering along the shore line. obviously the pros seen something in this video to announce/suggest an expedition go up there to check it out further.

I read somewhere that BC got 6 figures for this so far.

reply posted on 3-5-2005 @ 07:31 PM by Esoterica

Originally posted by scar
It's very blurry

That's an understatement if I've ever heard one.

reply posted on 3-5-2005 @ 07:32 PM by Ajax

Originally posted by Dr Love
Ask yourself why the Discovery Channel website would even post this picture:

A Current Affair would not buy a video containing garbage like this, so what's it's purpose? This picture and the accompanying video are meant to plant a seed in everybody's mind that whatever we end up seeing in this Manitoba video is fake. Once again, it's psychology 101. The masses are being pre-conditioned before they ever even get to see the Manitoba video.

Besides the fact that the Discovery Channel Bigfoot obviously looks like a guy in an ape suit and is shorter than the Patterson bigfoot, notice in the Discovery Channel video how the creature's movements are strikingly similar to the creature in the old Patterson video. This is a set-up by those who want the public to continue to believe that Bigfoot doesn't exist. I seriously question the Discovery Channel and wonder who's really pulling the strings over there.

Because of this one picture and the accompanying video, I believe that 'they' know that the creature in the Manitoba video is real.

Peace

[edit on 3-5-2005 by Dr Love]