It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1. The US army bombards Falluja with poisoned gases and chemical weapons
2. The US army bombards Falluja with Phosphoric pumps
3. The US army have destruct houses, Mosques and stores and rubber value things
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
Consider the source, these are the same folks that brought out the fake porn picks of rape, last year...
It seams that they're still pumping out their fake stories...
Originally posted by DeltaChaos
I think the obvious question is: What purpose would American forces have for using chemical weapons in Fallujah?
The obvious answer here is, the US could not take fallujah no matter how hard they tried, so they resulted to using banned chemicals,
First, American policy clearly states that chemical and biological weapons are not to be used under any circimstances, ever. Therefore, they have no chemical weapons to use.
Ok im guessing this is a joke? its commen knowledge america has and still devolops alongside with Isreal many nasty chemicals, including "safe" ones which are meant to cause tempory damage but probably do much worse in the long run
Second, to use chemical weapons in such a close-in battle environment would facilitate the need to use chemical protective gear by our forces. This would reduce our combat effectiveness and longevity. And how many photos exist of US Troops wearing their pro-masks? None...
Do you really think infantry would desperse these chemicals in the middle of a battle field? Have you any photos of ANYONE in a battle carrying around giant gas bottles spraying enemies with them? The chemicals would be sprayed out of a plane or helicopter, or dropped in a bomb which explodes over the desired area
Third, these news services that report such rediculous claims on such a regular basis are hardly credible at this point. To publish a couple of photos and a couple of paragraphs simply stating that these are proof of their claims proves how rediculous and stupid they are. They have no concept of reality.
If they were any good, they would at least try just a little bit harder.
Well you could say the same about the rediculous claims made almost daily about the "war on terrorism". I really dont believe i need to start posting sources for the many cockups made by the US forces/media do i?. and FYI like i said in my earlier post these allagations came in many months ago just after the US managed to take falluja.
In all probability the US used these because short of flattening the whole of falluja (they had to leave a bit so they can pose with there newscrews!) this was the only way they could succeed.
Originally posted by xmotex
I don't know if it would suprise me too much, I am way past having any illusions about the morality of the Iraq War or it's supporters, but this seems politically risky for the US. Almost any chemical weapon would leave traces that could be found by investigators later on, and I don't think thre was any military necessity that justified the political risk.
I have no doubt that a great many innocents died by US hands in Fallujah, but without any physical evidence, claiming the use of chem weapons smells to me like a simple propaganda ploy by the insurgents.