It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrDead
Looks like its on the ground to me - theres little bumps of grass that are in front of it. It reminds me of that silo or the tarp pic in another ufo thread.
Originally posted by Cug
Focal length was given. You might want to download an exif viewer of some sort.
Originally posted by xu
the focus of the camera doesnt matter, because the cameras look to the whole picture and determines the focus, or looks to the center and determines the focus, you cant autofocus a fly which has mountains behind it. and in wider angles it focus really doesnt matter much, also the picture looks out-of-focus in general.
Originally posted by xu
cug you got me wrong, "the focus does not matter in this case.
someone said the focus is 2000 ft. therefore the object is at 2000ft, what I was trying to say it is not always the case.
and in wider (i.e. 35 mm)angles depth of field is too wide, it doesnt really matter if something is out-of-focus or not, because there is a limit to maximum blur that de-focused object will create. but of course in narrow angles (i.e 200 mm) depth of field is to narrow that even a slight defocus will blur the image highly.
I started to print my B&W photos while I was 12, which I shot in a full professional camera at the time, and I didnt have exposure meter then, so please...
obviously the picture was taken by the author knowing fully that the building looked like a UFO from his viewpoint. nice fake...
it's a shame you waste our time.
Originally posted by theRiverGoddess
It was not moving when we saw this....it was SO strange I immediately took a pic, for I had the camera in my lap being we were on a little trip and seeing the sights. We were on a hilltop area and took this pic at an intersection.