This topic is in the 9/11 Conspiracies discussion forum.  (rss)


Two 9-11 hijackers 'lived with FBI informant'




Topic started on 23-7-2003 @ 02:48 PM by diva


>>>THE FBI lost a chance to uncover the September 11 plot by failing to investigate evidence that two of the suicide hijackers were living with a bureau informant, a congressional inquiry is expected to report this week.

The study also contains new evidence suggesting that a Saudi Arabian government agent may have been a key associate of the al Qaeda attackers, according to Newsweek magazine.

The long-delayed conclusions of the 900-page report, to be released on Thursday, raises new concerns about the FBI missing critical clues on 9-11 and raises questions about whether Saudi officials were secretly monitoring the hijackers or even facilitating their conduct.

One US congressman involved in the probe told the magazine the findings were "a scathing indictment of the FBI as an agency that doesn't have a clue about terrorism".<<<

www.theherald.co.uk...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-7-2003 @ 02:58 PM by ThePrankMonkey



Originally posted by diva
>>>THE FBI lost a chance to uncover the September 11 plot by failing to investigate evidence that two of the suicide hijackers were living with a bureau informant, a congressional inquiry is expected to report this week.

The study also contains new evidence suggesting that a Saudi Arabian government agent may have been a key associate of the al Qaeda attackers, according to Newsweek magazine.

The long-delayed conclusions of the 900-page report, to be released on Thursday, raises new concerns about the FBI missing critical clues on 9-11 and raises questions about whether Saudi officials were secretly monitoring the hijackers or even facilitating their conduct.

One US congressman involved in the probe told the magazine the findings were "a scathing indictment of the FBI as an agency that doesn't have a clue about terrorism".<<<

www.theherald.co.uk...





this doesnt surprise me. the agencies STILL do not fully communicate with each other. they are overrun with bureaucrats and pencil pushers that make sure every little paper clip is accounted for and everyone receives "sensitivity" training is given more priority than actually finding and punishing bad guys.

as long as the powers that be run the government (from the congress to the white house) we will never really be free of this BS to let the agencies do what they were designed to do.

im not surprised by this at all. the government has been given hot intel before and sat on it without acting. need an example? mogudishu.

when these agencies DO get good credible intel what happens? they have have meetings and conferences about it but rather than saying "act on it ASAP" and accepting the consquences if anything goes wrong later they want to fully plan crap out and talk about what they should do and by the time they decide to act the intel is old stale and thats when bad things happen that shouldnt happen.

why do they act this way? two words, career track.

if they gave the go ahead to do something and later found out they were wrong it would ruin their career.

basically what this means is they are tying one hand behind their backs at the expense of having a good career folder.

nice to know the people in charge think and act this way isnt it?

sure gives me that fuzzy feeling deep down inside that makes me want to vomit in disgust over this.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-7-2003 @ 03:06 PM by tututkamen


Well lets see,

At the risk of sounding like a broken record here goes

When investigating the possibility of a conspiracy always ask who stood to gain by removing all the fail safes that have been impossed to prevent such an act?

FAA, NORAD,CIA,etc.... the list goes on and now the FBI informant fails to inform, fire the nit wit. Why are we employing him with my tax dollars if he is not goijng to do his danm job

Those planes should have been shot down long before they reached NYC airspace, especially the one that took a sharp left at Springfield, Ma. an hour out of NYC

America wake up

TUT



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 23-7-2003 @ 03:11 PM by tututkamen


nice to know the people in charge think and act this way isnt it?

Monkey quote


Good Morning Monkey,

Guess I am a bit more cynical than you. And question who and where in the chain this type of info is deleted or surpressed. I repeat cynical, not paranoid.

tut

btw thanks again Diva



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-7-2003 @ 11:17 AM by Gazrok



Those planes should have been shot down long before they reached NYC airspace, especially the one that took a sharp left at Springfield, Ma. an hour out of NYC

America wake up


Don't worry we did after 911....

At least when it comes to planes. I fly pretty often, and you can see everybody (especially experienced fliers) checking for suspiscious activity often. If anybody tries anything like 911 again with planes...the plane will go down before it hits its target...that's for sure....

What we really need to wake up to, are our other soft targets...and make sure we are guarding them as well.

[Edited on 24-7-2003 by Gazrok]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:












ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , , , ,
















ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.081 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread