It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Your only restating what I already had. I said the images were off the card through PhotoShop as a reply to Cug. You dont read.
My guess is you have an issue with me on something else, cuz this is lame. Maybe you really hate the idea of Mexico City's big disc being crap? Maybe you dont like my opinion on the Swiss case?
i would assume this is due to high credentials however when i type in "Jeffrey Ritzmann" into my search engine i only get two hits and both of them lead me to rense.
Originally posted by they see ALL
...are we going to make a final answer on of the pic is real???
Allthough i said i would not add further im just answering gazrok, any way i use google but using dogpile i get this.........
Originally posted by Gazrok
...is that he is part of a group of guys who get all dressed up in full Vader, Stormtrooper gear, etc. and visit terminally ill children in hospitals to lift their spirits, etc.
Originally posted by minniescar
In as such i always question , an example as to why i consider this important is where i posted a pic in a different forum with the caption " look i got a pic of the ghost in my basement". The image itself was just a joke and it was mearly a pic of the construction i was doing in my basement, but when i took the pic i was smoking and of course some smoke got into the pic. It just so happened the smoke formed what the imagination could conceive as a face. The thread went on for 5 pages as people who claimed to be experts analyzed the image to debunk it. Many sited shadows, points of reference, as well as other factors all of which led to the conclusion the photo had been altered. hell they had done so much work they almost convinced me it had been photoshopped even though i knew it had come straight from my camera to my pc with no alteration. They had all in fact debunked an un-altered photo thus proving anything can be deemed a fake if you look hard enough.
The fatal flaw each and everyone of these experts missed was not one of them checked the header signature of the image which is a very common mistake amongst debunkers. I mearly find it odd you made this same mistake yet did so intentionally to teach a lesson.