The Hard Truth Of September Eleventh., page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 1-6-2005 @ 11:52 AM by Musclor
I am seriously wondering if both of you actually downloaded the video because almost your main questions can be answered by watching it.


If it was a missle or bomb....why are the flashes so small and only centered where the nose of the plane is going in at? If it was a missle, there's no way that's possible.


I have to ask you this: How can you claim that the flash was prior to the impact and not the actual initial impact of the plane with the building?


As it can be clearly seen on the video, the flash does NOT occurs on the nose of the plane, and also occurs BEFORE the impact. Watch the video, there is no better explanation than VIDEO PROOF.



Secondly, are you claiming that this is not the same plane full of passengers that departed Logan? How did a plane with a missile hanging off of it pull away from the gate, surely the ramp workers would have noticed?


I don't have a damn idea. I just wanted to talk about the flash. I haven't investigated much concerning that, maybe others guys on ATS can add their word about that.



Finally there is the issue of timing. How are you going to fire that missile exactly when the nose of the plane is only a few inches from hitting the building?


Technology can do lots of things nowadays. I assume it would be very easy to program this. But i'm not expert. Maybe someone can help.


The fact is that something weird happens. And the missile theory is certainly not a silly idea. Do you offer another explanation ?
Again, please watch the video carefully and you should have some of your questions answered. If no, i will start to doubt about your good faith.

[edit on 1/6/2005 by Musclor]



reply posted on 1-6-2005 @ 12:46 PM by HowardRoark


Where is the pod again? I just see the normal fairing at the wing root.


reply posted on 1-6-2005 @ 02:32 PM by Musclor


The pod is clearly visible in this picture. Taken from New York Magazine, September 24th, 2001 issue.

[edit on 1/6/2005 by Musclor]



reply posted on 1-6-2005 @ 04:38 PM by HowardRoark
You are looking at the fairing of the wing root. Due to the light and shadow effects, it looks odd in that photo, but it is a standard part of that type of plane.

Take a look at
this photo.

Notice the fairing at the wing root. Also notice the landing gear doors. How would have it been possible to raise the landing gear and close the doors with that “Pod” in the way? Please explain to me how this would work.


In this photo you can see the lights at the leading edge of the fairing. Kind of like on your so called “pod.” notice also how the fairing on the far side of the fuselage stands out from the bottom of the fuselage.

And even more views:

here the rounded edges of the fairing are clearly discernable.

Is that a pod on the left side of this plane?

www.airliners.net...








[edit on 1-6-2005 by HowardRoark]


reply posted on 8-6-2005 @ 03:17 AM by Koka
While many claim the fashes occur a second or so before impact, when I watch the footage it looks to me as though the plane has definitely impacted the building.

However, the flashes do appear to occur one or 2 metres to the right of the cockpit. This is hard to verify on the 1st hit (North Tower) as the Naudet brother's footage was taken from a great distance and not at the best of angles to verify where exactly the flash occurs, it does however occur at pretty much the same time as the 2nd hit (South Tower).

Now, we can go on speculating about the flashes, but without further evidence that is all we can do, a simple explaination would be that an electrical conduit was ruptured.

As for the pod attachment theory, this is inconclusive, as I mentioned previously. In the numerous pieces of footage I have seen, there does appear to be an enlarged area in the undercarriage area, it does not however appear on all the different available shots. I believe that this pronounced area looks larger than normal as the contrast is quit great between light and dark, the plane was tilting more and more, in an anti-clockwise direction, the closer it drew to the tower. As the plane tilted, the shadow of the right engine falls on the undercarriage, this would also explain why some have claimed that the object appears to change shape, logical in my book.

To continue to speculate on the pod theory, merely detracts from the greater anomolies that occured on that day and to insist on these kinds of theories, which cannot be verified, only fuels the arguments of the debunkers, who will discredit more obvious discrepencies regarding 9/11, as they have been bundle with less credible theories.

You don't need anymore evidence than that supplied by the Commander in Cheif himself.
Damning Evidence for 9/11 Conspiracy

[edit on 8-6-2005 by Koka]
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 12 days ago with 59 member flags
The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 2 days ago with 19 member flags
Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 12 days ago with 11 member flags
ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags
There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 11 days ago with 10 member flags