While many claim the fashes occur a second or so before impact, when I watch the footage it looks to me as though the plane has definitely impacted
the building.
However, the flashes do appear to occur one or 2 metres to the right of the cockpit. This is hard to verify on the 1st hit (North Tower) as the Naudet
brother's footage was taken from a great distance and not at the best of angles to verify where exactly the flash occurs, it does however occur at
pretty much the same time as the 2nd hit (South Tower).
Now, we can go on speculating about the flashes, but without further evidence that is all we can do, a simple explaination would be that an electrical
conduit was ruptured.
As for the pod attachment theory, this is inconclusive, as I mentioned previously. In the numerous pieces of footage I have seen, there does appear to
be an enlarged area in the undercarriage area, it does not however appear on all the different available shots. I believe that this pronounced area
looks larger than normal as the contrast is quit great between light and dark, the plane was tilting more and more, in an anti-clockwise direction,
the closer it drew to the tower. As the plane tilted, the shadow of the right engine falls on the undercarriage, this would also explain why some have
claimed that the object appears to change shape, logical in my book.
To continue to speculate on the pod theory, merely detracts from the greater anomolies that occured on that day and to insist on these kinds of
theories, which cannot be verified, only fuels the arguments of the debunkers, who will discredit more obvious discrepencies regarding 9/11, as they
have been bundle with less credible theories.
You don't need anymore evidence than that supplied by the Commander in Cheif himself.
Damning Evidence for 9/11 Conspiracy
[edit on 8-6-2005 by Koka]