It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Gazrok
jritzmann, you're the image expert, but looks to me like pic 3 could easily be a model suspended from one of the tree branches. As mentioned, lines such as fishing line can easily be scrubbed out nowadays, so nothing too hard there.
Originally posted by Gazrok
jritzmann, you're the image expert, but looks to me like pic 3 could easily be a model suspended from one of the tree branches. As mentioned, lines such as fishing line can easily be scrubbed out nowadays, so nothing too hard there.
As an aside, the method of pics 1 and 2 may be what Meier used for his infamous pics. I think you're somewhat familiar with that...no?
Originally posted by jritzmann
Is there *any* sign at all that the tether is seen in these images? Xabora did his test for manipulation, and saw no alterations. How good is that test? Does anyone see any evidence for tether in the photos? What if the tether was removed by an image editor? Wouldn't his test show that?
Originally posted by Hal9000
Jeff, can you explain the difference between say a 3.2 mpxl and 5mpxl digital cammera. Pixels are the same size right? So would a picture taken with a 5 mpxl camera be larger in size and have better resolution than a 3.2? Thanks.
Great thread by the way, I've always wondered about this stuff.
Originally posted by jritzmann
One thing to note as far as our example, is that the houses are burred a percentage more then the trees. The trees a percentage more than the disc. That puts the disc close. In estimation based on blur separation, the disc could be less then 3 feet away. The tether would show. The question is can it be found.