It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by skychief
Finally, many feel that we should give up on manned space flights and concentrate on robotic missions.
Originall posted by IAF101
NASA needs to be scaled down and made more efficient; we need more scientists working to make science more affordable....For space to be viable it need to be treated as an industry, just as the military is.
This is not to say that we forget Space and our ultimate dream of space colonization, but we put it off till we have the necessary tech required to do so. We were on the moon nearly fifty years ago and have not been able to make any further advancement on the moon since then, this shows that we rushed into it without fully understanding our purpose.
Originally posted by IAF101
what will we gain from actually putting a man on mars?
Chakotay: Species continuity and economic growth.
Will going to Mars get that person a job or ease their life in anyway?
Yes. Without aerospace projects, there are no aerospace jobs. These include such mundane tasks as mopping the floor, so I am assuming that person will qualify.
NASA needs to be scaled down and made more efficient
And if you don't care if our species continues, well, get out of the way of those of us who do. Or get stepped on.
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer
Originall posted by IAF101
NASA needs to be scaled down and made more efficient; we need more scientists working to make science more affordable....For space to be viable it need to be treated as an industry, just as the military is.
Excuse me if I'm wrong, but these seem to be in opposition with each other.
Originally posted by Chakotay
Originally posted by skychief
Finally, many feel that we should give up on manned space flights and concentrate on robotic missions.
Spin. Spin is the subtle but lethal jab in the back. As in 'many feel'. Heap many? This subliminal suggestion that the US should roll over and play dead in manned space is unsupported by proof
Originally posted by Chakotay
Originally posted by IAF101
what will we gain from actually putting a man on mars?
Chakotay: Species continuity and economic growth.
Originally posted by Chakotay
Originally posted by IAF101
Will going to Mars get that person a job or ease their life in anyway?
Yes. Without aerospace projects, there are no aerospace jobs. These include such mundane tasks as mopping the floor, so I am assuming that person will qualify.
Originally posted by Chakotay
...I buy when other people sell, sell when they buy, and I understand from Keynes that without projects (capital spending) there is no hiring (employment) so there is no consumption (purchasing) so there are no sales and the economy implodes.
Originally posted by Chakotay
As for species continuity, ask the Mammoth. They didn't have a Moon base when the climate changed.
Originally posted by Aelita
I think that manned exploration right now is an unproductive use of resources. We need a tryly reliable and cheap reusable platform. Shuttles need to be redesigned and replaced. Before we build a tractor-trailer, lets learn how to fix a Honda Civic.
And, comparing the Mars robotic missions to teenage toys... Sorry man but all you have shown is (a) zero knowledge of engineering (b) pure contempt for people who designed this wonderful system, simply because it was not manned.
IAF wrote: Why don't you ask ' MAN ' whether he hibernated on the moon when the climate changed on Earth during the Ice Age?