It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is too bad you did not make a pilgramage to WTC. I think most Americans who visit NYC make a HUGE effort to go there. I guess that American patriotism and solidarity is beneath you.
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
IN MY VIEW BOMBING THE MECCA SHRINE WHEN IT IS EMPTY IS MUCH LESS A 'CRIME' THEN BOMBING THE WTC WITH A SINGLE PERSON IN IT. LIFE IS MUCH MORE VALUABLE THAN A BUILDING.
Originally posted by Souljah
Would you be happy if Muslims demoloshed an Israeli Holy place - the Wailing Wall?
Originally posted by colin_hal
Alright Germans Exterminated 6 million jews why weren't they nuked?
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
The Muslims already demolished several Jewish holy places:
1- Jacobs tomb in Nabalus was destroyed by that Palestinians in 2000.
2- The Ancient synagauge in Jericho was also torched that same year.
3- above 40 synagauges many ancient in east Jerusalem where Destroyed by the Jordanians following the Israeli war of Independence in 1948.
4- Muslims from the Al-Aqza mosque would regularly stone Jewish worshippers in the wailing wall below.
5- The destruction of the synagogue in Djerba, Algeria by al-qaida.
And the list goes on and on and on and on.
It is idiotic to think that human life is less important. A murdered individual cannot be resurrected. Buildings that can be restored.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
AMM, threatening with nukes is utter suicide on a long enough timeline. I posted at length about this here: [Deterrence Theory is a Fraud]
MAD is an illusion because nobody's destruction can be mutually assured. The Soviets and the Chinese will have many survivors of a US nuclear strike because they have a different mentality than the US. They have civil defense. They have bunkers and tunnels. Did you notice how the Vietnamese were able to tunnel around, even directly under US bases? Do you think these people's destruction will be 'assured' just because we lob our nukes at them? I say many of them will survive our surface blasts. What has been gained when this theory is tested?
The term Mutually Assured Destruction means nothing and is essentially a non-concept. Even if you were holding your pistol to your opponent's head and you both pulled your triggers, you could not assure your enemy's destruction. To posture with nuclear weapons is simply to hasten the eventual breakdown in an interconnected system.
Originally posted by Aelita
Originally posted by colin_hal
Alright Germans Exterminated 6 million jews why weren't they nuked?
Because JudahMaccabi has a fixation on bombing Mecca, that's why.
MAD is a PROVEN concept thus far in history. It has worked. You can not argue that.
Originally posted by JudahMaccabbi
Muslims have destroyed many religious shrines in India, Israel, Europe and somehow this was tolerated. 9/11 targeted a way of life that is based on a system of beliefs. You need to think in a secular mind frame for this. They targeted secularism, capitalism and everything they perceive as AMERICAN. There are those who love the US more than they love their religion. To them this is a desecration of their way of life.
I purposely used an extreme example in order to point out that mosque in MECCA is no better than WTC, the UN building or Joseph's tomb in Nabalus.
What is of importance is human life which seems to be of the least importance to these fundamentalists. If these fanatics understand that their holy shrine is to be targeted should their attacks continue and the free world learns to grasp the magnitude of the WTC attack then maybe WW III can be averted. In my view WWIII will be against Islam regardless of if we attack MECCA or not.
Originally posted by Souljah
Anyway, lets take a look what happened to Iraqi historical, cultural and religious heritage, when the US forces "liberated" Iraq of the "criminals, terrorists and tyrants":
* Shi'ites move BAghdad's greatest library to Najaf, Turks. US, 22 April 2003
* Burned libraries make Iraq's history a war casualty, Boston Globe, 21 April 2003
* The vanishing past: Iraq's proud library turns to bitter ashes, Washington Post, 18 April 2003
* Glendive priest decries looting of Iraqi artifacts, April 17, 2003, BillingsGazette
* Pakistan shocked at burning of Qur'aan library in Baghdad, April 17, 2003, HiPakistan
* Pillagers sack, burn Iraq library, treasures, Independent Record, 16 April 2003
* Inquiry demanded over US failure to stop library looting, April 16, 2003, Independent
* Ancient archive lost in Baghdad library blaze, The Guardian, 15 April 2003
More Iraq Museum stories:
* Iraqis say US ignored pleas to halt museum looting, Reuters, 24 April 2003
* Professionals suspected in looting of museum, International Herald Tribune, 21 April 2003
* US army was told to protect looted museum, The Observer, 20 April 2003
* Our First Words, Written in Clay, in an Accountant's Hand, New York Times April 20, 2003
* Missing: A Vase, a Book, a Bird and 10,000 Years of History, New York Times, April 20, 2003
* The looting of Baghdad's museum and library: US government implicated in planned theft of Iraqi artistic treasures, WSWS, 19 April 2003
* Experts: Looters had keys to Iraq Museum, The Guardian, 18 April 2003
* When 'free people' loot. The Globe and Mail, 18 April 2003
* Looters May Have Destroyed Priceless Cuneiform Archive, Washington Post, April 17, 2003
* Signs point to planned heist: Only office items, select antiquities stolen, officials say, 17 April 2003, Chicago Tribune (Free registration required)
* The end of civilization, April 17, 2003, Salon.com
* Museum theft looks organized: Antiquities grab called selective, April 16, 2003, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
* The sacking of Iraq's museums: US wages war against culture and history, WSWS, 16 April 2003
* 'Cradle of civilization' is rocked, April 16, 2003, THE WASHINGTON TIMES
* Letters. The high price of museum plundering, April 16, 2003, The Guardian
* Comment. Is this plundering really so bad?, April 15, 2003 , The Guardian
* British Museum says Baghdad looting a catastrophe ahead of UNESCO meeting, April 15, 2003 , SpaceDaily
* On the scene. Jim Clancy: Museum 'shattered' by looters, April 15, 2003 , CNN
* CNN LIVE TODAY. Looting Destroys Prehistoric Iraqi Treasures, April 15, 2003 , CNN
* The looting of Iraq's past April 14, 2003 , USAToday
* Treasures Looted from Baghdad Museum Feared Lost, April 14, 2003 , Reuters
* Rich past stripped as future in tatters, April 14, 2003 , Sydney Morning Herald
* The Ransacking of the Baghdad Museum Is a Disgrace, April 14, 2003 , History News Network
* US blamed for failure to stop sacking of museum, April 14, 2003 , Independent
* Looters ransack museum's treasure, April 14, 2003 , The Australian
* Museum's treasures left to the mercy of looters, April 14, 2003 , The Guardian
* Pentagon Was Told Of Risk to Museums, U.S. Urged to Save Iraq's Historic Artifacts, April 14, 2003 , The Washington Post
* 'The collection lies in ruins, objects from a long, rich past in smithereens', April 14, 2003 , The Guardian
* Yale professor concerned about treasures destroyed in Iraq, April 13, 2003 , WTNH News
* Inside the remains of the Iraqi Museum of Archaeology, April 12-13, 2003 , The Guardian
* A civilisation torn to pieces, April 13, 2003 , Independent
* Art Experts Fear Worst in the Plunder of a Museum, April 13, 2003, The New York Times
Nice list ey?
Originally posted by Aelita
Originally posted by colin_hal
Alright Germans Exterminated 6 million jews why weren't they nuked?
Because JudahMaccabi has a fixation on bombing Mecca, that's why.
Originally posted by colin_hal
Muslim countries aren't perfect, but neither is the West.
Throughout history there's been extreme amounts of violence, and when we look back at all of that. What was the point of it all?
Now we have a chance to make the world a better place for future generations, we should be calling for calm.
Yes there are extremists in muslim countries and the muslims have to rise up against them
, but George Bush's tactics is making muslims feel as if they are under attack as a whole.
If someone invaded your country you would fight him even if you do not agree with your countries politics. And when you lose, you will feel humiliated.
Then you will become desperate and will want to support anyone who is willing to give you back your sense of pride. Even if that person was the devil himself.
We saw how desperate the Germans had become to have backed up someone like Hitler.
Muslims do not support these millitant groups, but most of them don't speak out against them because they feel as if they would be traitors.
This is the problem with having a dictatorship where people have to conform to an ideology.
America is blamed, and Israel is blamed for most of the problems that are taking place in the Middle East.
If you've met a muslim person whether he is living in America or elsewhere, you'll notice he just a human being just like you.
He wants no harm done to you, although people do look at him/her with contempt because they are pumped with fear by the media.
So in America too people are being indoctrinated, not only is it happening in the Middle East.
Even in childrens programs.
Islam is never discussed, or ever mentioned, its looked at very negatively.
I remember WWF used to have Iraqi characters, and sudanese characters, who were basically the bad guys. They would come waving their flag and get their asses kicked. This is indoctrination.
As a muslim I can safely tell you that no true muslim would attack a place of worship.
Never should we insult another persons religion either, because he can just easily insult yours, which would escalate from there.
Infact you see KKK members desecrating crosses, you see a certain musician ripping up a bible in the name of "freedom of speech" and "art".
When does one draw the line? Freedom of speech is a beautiful thing, but should one use it to attack someone's beliefs and ridicule them?
I know muslims get very touchy about this matter and again you'll find the most ignorant ones who seem very religious that carry out violent acts against the ones who belittle our religion.
The reason why muslims get very upset is because religion is all they have.
If you believe that this material world is of no benefit to you, then you will only value your goal which is God.
So Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Al-qaida and Hezbullah are not a Muslim based organizations?
Now lets talk about suicide bombers and nukes.
Both are forbidden, you can't commit suicide nor can you kill someone with fire.
Like what happened in Sept 11th many muslims have already condemned it, and it was an act of terror.
Many of the uneducated muslims (may God guide them) are running around declaring holy war.
Now this is something that a small group like Al Queda cannot declare, and the majority of muslims don't support them.
We as muslims are not doing enough to spread the true message of Islam which is peace. Thats our job as muslims.
Holy war is to be declared against those who have pushed us out of our homes, and stopped us from practicing our faith.
In America muslims are given alot of freedom which is something I am very grateful for.
I believe the main issue that should be addressed at the moment is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Which no one has paid enough attention to, and its only going to get worse and worse.
Muslims see America as turning a blind eye to the Injustice Israeli's are inflicting on Palestinians.
As America is a very good Ally with Israel, and one of their main financial aid.
Originally posted by colin_hal
Like you Mentioned Mecca is a religious site, not a military target.
The whole faith revolves around there, you would be destroying something so dear to us.
It makes me sick to hear people even considering it as an option.
Extremists always view the apposing as being flies.
Originally posted by Odium
6,739 Israeli casualties, including 862 deaths, and 23,593 Palestinian casualties, including 2,233 dead
25 (1 German) physicians / nurses / ambulance drivers killed while on duty (opening fire on ambulances/shelling of residential areas).10
425 PRCS and Union of Palestinian Medical Relief Committees (UPMRC) Emergency Medical Technicians and first aid workers injured (including 2 physicians). 121 ambulances were attacked and damaged.
36 PRCS and UPMRC ambulances destroyed.
197 attacks on PRCS ambulances by live ammunition, rubber bullets, and/or stones thrown by Israeli settlers.
991 incidents of denial of access to PRCS ambulances at roadblocks were reported.
85 Palestinian deaths due to prevention of access to emergency health care or treatment of chronic diseases. 290 counts of hospitals and clinics attacked and damaged. 71 emergency personnel and volunteers arrested since the invasion on 29 Match 11. During the long invasion in March/April 2002, UPMRC staff were stopped, detained and denied access up to 3 times daily, since April 2002 the mobile clinics severely obstructed.
12 Journalists killed by Israeli forces, (1 Italian, 1 British),
295 journalists wounded as a result of gun shots, physical assault or other means of attack,
5 Palestinian journalists arrested and currently in administrative detention
Total income losses to Palestinian economy est. between $ 3.2-10 billion (income only, does not include cost of destruction of public and private property).
Daily domestic losses: $6.0 – 8.6 million/business day
Total wage income loss: $59.4 million
Economic losses forcing 69% of Palestinian firms either to shut down or reduce production.
51% drop in GNP.40 Israel prevents 125,000 Palestinians from going to work
The World Bank estimates that in case of a solution to the conflict and lifting of the closure it will take at least 2 years for the Palestinian economy to restore to a pre-Intifada per capita income level/
If you look into it, there have been more Palestinian women and children killed then Israeli casualties, over all. - That's why there is a problem.
Also the fact Israel is in breach of the 4th Geneva Convention and as such the actions should be considered war crimes. (Targetted assasinations) Yet nothing is being done.
You can't have a rule for one and a rule for another - everything has to be fair.
If America bothered to take as hard a stance on Israel as it does the rest of the Middle East, you'd see a lot less terrorists against America. It's a simple way to solve it - treat everyone fairly. (THIS WILL HELP)
Think of it from this view: Israel will not let you use your own schools, it will not let you go to some of your Religious shrines, it has destroyed homes, broken several international laws and nobody stops them.
You would lash out - I know I would.
Then you get random attacks on Schools, Hospitals, houses, etc, beause they think terrorists live there - this kills your wife or kid...how would that make you feel?
There's a way to stop it happening and it is not by the path we're on.
(Statistics taken from the Guardian Newspaper).