"The US military has asked for $90 million of extra funding to increase the signal strength of its satellite Global Positioning System (GPS). The
Department of Defense says this would protect it from atmospheric interference and deliberate jamming.
Whether the funds will be awarded will be decided early in 2003. The money would be used to modify up to 20 new satellites, the first of which would
launch in 2004. The new satellites would be fully operational by 2006.
Each satellite would be fitted with more powerful radio transmitters to boost the GPS signal to eight times that currently used. This would provide
greater accuracy by reducing atmospheric interference. It would also make it more difficult for an adversary to jam the signal to disorientate troops
on the ground or throw smart weapons off course."
www.newscientist.com...
Thisa is great news for those of us who use it to map and survey and spend countless hours dealing with poor signal strength and trying to get signal
under tree canopy. However, it may also add fule to the fire that governemtn plans to implant GPS chips to track us. Stronger signal means smaller
receivers.
|
Astrocreep, I would agree with your assessment there at the end..... Not a good idea at all...
I would also ask, since you are far more active in GPS applications than I am, have you noticed any changes or other perterbations in GPS performance?
I am wondering if this is a signal increase to compensate for interference from HAARP, which seems to be constantly increasing in output? Or possibly
as an orbital transmission system to augment HAARP?
|
I would also ask, since you are far more active in GPS applications than I am, have you noticed any changes or other perterbations in GPS
performance?
Actually, I've been trapped in the lab for the last month or so, thus my increased activity on ats but I did work in the field today but I'm
training a summer intern and let him run the GPS today. I'll either DL the data tomorrow or Friday and if I see anything weird in the metadata logs,
I'll post it but he didn't mention anything unusual to me.
|
Just to follow-up. Looked at the GPS records from Wed. Nothing out of the ordinary but we did log 7 to 8 sats all day. thats amazing for KY.
Usually 5 to 6 sats is considered good but I've notice better coverage the last year or so. When I began this in 98', it was really a headache. We
only use US sats although some companies sell Glonass capable too but Trimble doesn't rely on them.
|
well I for one welcome a better GPS signal, it will mean for aviators..both professional and otherwise....a far more accurate and reliable set of nav
data..particularly in inhospitable areas. 
|
spear, yeah it will make things nicer..especially to those of us trying to get centimeter or better survey points in the Appalachians. But it also
means tracking GPS(which doesn't require L1 and L2 signals) will be able to use smaller antennas..thus the fear of tracking implants.
|
