It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

How To Give Yourself Cancer - In 5 Easy Steps!

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 11 2005 @ 10:28 AM
link   
I found this article very disturbing because as the author mentions Americans and Westerners in general are following these exact steps. I also wanted user input on the sunscreen issue this article presents. This article seems to suggest sunlight actually prevents cancer. Does anyone have any rebuttal links to this since all I could find where articles that were particularly bias.



One thing to keep in mind in all of this is that everybody has cancer right now. In other words, there are cancerous cells in the human body of every person who is living and breathing right now, at this very moment. All you have to do to get diagnosed with cancer is make sure your immune system is sufficiently suppressed so that your body can't take care of the cancerous cells on a regular basis. In other words, if you destroy your immune system function through poor nutrition, nutrient depletion, smoking, lack of sunlight and lack of physical exercise, then it won't be able to do its job of cleaning up cancerous cells around the body and as a result, cancer will become a full-blown disease in no time.


Some questions i'd like others to ponder on as well:

Does anyone else think its possible that we aren't getting the whole truth on the cancer issue?

Can the immune system actually reverse malignant cancers with the proper diet?

Lastly i'd like to know how many people follow these steps to getting cancer on this board? What are your thoughts as too how accurate this article is?

www.newstarget.com...

[edit on 11-4-2005 by Linux]




posted on Apr, 11 2005 @ 11:19 AM
link   
I don't think we've been duped on the cancer issue. It's very real- I've had family afflicted by it, and I've done a clinical rotation in oncology. My grandfather had colon cancer- which could have been caused by a lack of fiber in his diet. I had an uncle pass away from Chronic Mylogenous Leukemia- attributed in part to too many X-rays in the 70's. A coworker of mine has recurring lung cancer, had one lung removed, and then they found cancer in the other- she smoked for 40 years.

By no means will diet and exercise, and not smoking, prevent cancer, but they sure will curb your chances of getting it.

as for the sunlight issue, I'm not sure how much that will play into cancer- sunlight promotes Vitamin D production in the body, but I don't think we've seen a link between Vitamin D and cancer- I could be mistaken though.

There have also been certain instances where the body has fought off cancer, even to the point of remission, just by following a certain, very strict diet... Suzanne Somers is a good example of that, although she may have had chemotherapy too, I don't recall her story aside from the dietary stuff she did.

Personally, I'd rather be bombarded with the cancer drugs, rather than trying to get rid of cancer through my diet- I guess I'll take a 50-50 chance with the drugs, as opposed to an unidentified chance with the diet.

[edit on 11-4-2005 by Bobbo]



posted on Apr, 11 2005 @ 11:26 AM
link   
I must say this, Cannabis THC cells directly injected into mice and rats had circumstantial positive effects towards the killing of cancerous cells and in some cases completly removed the cancer. Yet it is still banned to this day!

You are right everyone has cancerous cells, when the cell becomes less than 60% oxygen is when the cancer has proven dominant over the cell.

Sorry to anyone that has lost a loved one due to cancer.

[edit on 11/4/05 by Hunting Veritas]



posted on Apr, 11 2005 @ 11:34 AM
link   
The notion that overdoing the sun won't harm you is crap; proven to be crap by my family, and by others I know. Not taking precautions to limit sun exposure will cause cancer.



posted on Apr, 11 2005 @ 11:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Bobbo
By no means will diet and exercise, and not smoking, prevent cancer, but they sure will curb your chances of getting it.


Thats my personal stance on the topic as well. I'm sorry to hear about your losses as well. I wasn't claiming cancer wasn't real, I meant perhaps the whole truth isn't reaching the public.



posted on Apr, 11 2005 @ 11:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
The notion that overdoing the sun won't harm you is crap; proven to be crap by my family, and by others I know. Not taking precautions to limit sun exposure will cause cancer.


I agree with you, as does a whole whack of scientific studies i've read. That's what struck me as odd is that this article claims otherwise.

Here is the article I originally found on that same website, which claims lack of sunshine is creating these problems.

www.newstarget.com...



posted on Apr, 11 2005 @ 01:16 PM
link   
As far as I know, UVA cant cause any damage to us in terms of cancer. Its the UVB and UVC that is deadly. The holes in the ozone layer and the thinning of the ozone layer in general around th world is whats causing sunlight to be dangerous to our health.

I'd say 50 years ago you could stand out in the sun for countless hours and not get skin cancer.



posted on Apr, 22 2005 @ 07:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by LuDaCrIs
As far as I know, UVA cant cause any damage to us in terms of cancer. Its the UVB and UVC that is deadly. The holes in the ozone layer and the thinning of the ozone layer in general around th world is whats causing sunlight to be dangerous to our health.

I'd say 50 years ago you could stand out in the sun for countless hours and not get skin cancer.



how many holes are there then?
i thought it was just at the poles?



posted on Apr, 22 2005 @ 11:38 PM
link   

how many holes are there then?
i thought it was just at the poles?


There's one massive hole over antarctica. I don't know of any others.

As for the article, I don't smoke or use sunscreen, so I'm safe on those two accounts. For the food additives, I know I consume some of the things on that list, but not in very high quantities. The physical exercise one is where I score an F-, though. I'm not overweight (6ft2, 175lbs) but I am terribly unfit. I can't sustain physical activities for very long. Other than a couple of the summer jobs I've had that required manual labour, I don't do anything physical at all, and I'll bet I'm not the only one.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 02:59 AM
link   
There is no doubt that too much sun exposure causes skin cancer. In Australia each year, over 374,000 Australians are diagnosed with non-melanoma skin cancer and almost 360 Australians die. Over 8,800 Australians are diagnosed with melanoma, and almost 1000 people die. Survival rates have risen significantly since the early eighties as a result of skin cancers being detected earlier and improved treatments.

Deliberate exposure to sunlight does not provide any health benefits. Australians receive more than sufficient sunlight for vitamin D production from just sitting near a window or by as little as two minutes outside during the day.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 03:50 AM
link   
Jubilee, I would argue that point. Vitamin D from sunlight exposure has been known to stop cancer in its tracks. You do need more than "window sunlight". Todays society of sitting inside at a computer or in front of a tv is causing much more cancer than before.

You need to get out in the sunlight.....Water, Sunlight, Earth and Air......not the four elements for nothing.....



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 04:20 AM
link   
Only 2mins a day in the sun huh. Then how come if I don't spend at least 1hr a day in the sun I start to get hayfever, skin irritations, my eyes start getting dry n bloodshot, I loose weight n become overall sick as a dog? The way I see it, from the moment you're born, you're dying. Ok, so I stay out of the sun, eat healthy and don't get cancer...instead I die of a heart attack. Ok, so now I work out, keep fit, stay out of the sun, eat healthy, don't die of cancer or a heart attack... and die of liver failure. Ok, so now I don't drink, smoke, go out in the sun, I eat healthy, I exercise regularly, I meditate, socialise to stay happy, never take drugs.....and get hit by a bus on the way to work.

Sun gives you cancer, artificial sweetener gives you cancer, somewhere I heard milk gives you cancer, smoking gives you cancer, too much of certain food gives you cancer. Cripes, who cares? Cancer is a part of our everyday life. It's in all of us. Just live life & enjoy yourself. You could go out get hit by a bus, the world could spontaneously explode tomorrow. We aren't on this planet for long so just enjoy the precious time you have instead of worrying about everything. I'd rather die of cancer or a heart attack or liver failure & be known as someone who took life by the dangly bits, laughed in it's face n made the most of what they had then someone to spent their life wasting away in a bubble because they were too afraid of the world.



posted on Apr, 23 2005 @ 05:28 AM
link   
Mayet and Lord Goofus I agree with you both, everyone needs to get out into the fresh air everyday. However, it is your own govt's statistics and info I have posted, from the Australian Cancer Council. My opinion is that you are probably going to get cancer whether you spend most of your time inside or out.

I do believe that skin and other cancers are in your genes. When I was a kid we were always outside and all warm weekends and holidays were spent at the beach cooking ourselves. We usually wore sunscreen and had zinced (is that a word?) (you remember what zinc cream on our noses looked like) yet we still managed to often end up burnt and peeling.


.


No-one in our family has ever had a melanoma yet I know others who are much younger and have had many removed.

Its like some smokers will get cancer and others won't.

I do believe we need Vitamin D each day and we won't achieve this sitting "by the window" however, what about those who live in really cold climates that have shorter days and residents who spend nearly all their time inside?



posted on May, 2 2005 @ 11:41 PM
link   
It's not really any big secret that food preservatives (like sodium nitrate) and lack of exercise can contribute to immune system deficiency and cancer, but this has been public knowledge for a number of years now. As far as the lack of sunlight goes, there are certain nutrients that sunlight aids in the production of, but most of them can be gained from artificial sources. Using sunblock typically only removes a certain percentage of Ultraviolet rays, certainly not enough to prevent the benefits given by sunlight (or the harm, for that matter). Refined carbohydrates aren't good in large amounts any way you look at it, but again, this isn't any big secret. When looking at articles like this, I have to be suspicious of anyone who makes outright claims, and then fails to make adequate citations to any medical journals to back up their claims.



posted on May, 7 2005 @ 04:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by LordGoofus
Only 2mins a day in the sun huh. Then how come if I don't spend at least 1hr a day in the sun I start to get hayfever, skin irritations, my eyes start getting dry n bloodshot, I loose weight n become overall sick as a dog? The way I see it, from the moment you're born, you're dying. Ok, so I stay out of the sun, eat healthy and don't get cancer...instead I die of a heart attack. Ok, so now I work out, keep fit, stay out of the sun, eat healthy, don't die of cancer or a heart attack... and die of liver failure. Ok, so now I don't drink, smoke, go out in the sun, I eat healthy, I exercise regularly, I meditate, socialise to stay happy, never take drugs.....and get hit by a bus on the way to work.


LOL I just had to say that first bit was really funny.

In addition I'd have to agree that there are alot more cancer causing agents in to world in terms of food perservatives, that people should be more aware of.



posted on May, 8 2005 @ 12:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Hunting Veritas
I must say this, Cannabis THC cells directly injected into mice and rats had circumstantial positive effects towards the killing of cancerous cells and in some cases completly removed the cancer. Yet it is still banned


Got some links for that one? And please not "Mother Jones" or "High Times" as a source. And its one think to have a medicaly controlled experiemnt using direct injection of THC, its another to "toke up" and wait for the cure.

Back on track: Cancer is not as cut and dry as this however. Genetics, environemnt and lifestyle all play a sig. role in who gets it, who fights it off and who does not.

[edit on 5/8/05 by FredT]



posted on May, 8 2005 @ 01:49 AM
link   
Don't know why people can't googl this stuff themselves, but here you go, a treasure trove of fairly recent medical news about the Sacred Herb and its medical benefits.

THC and Health Reported at
Cannabis Culture 1999
Medical.net 2004

GuerillaNews 2004

Express Pharma Pulse, india, 2005

foodConsumer.org 2005

Some place called EDP (some local TV in the UK?)

newsTarget 2005

Scientific American 2004

Drugsense.org 1998

Avoid cancer from the sun, wear hemp clothes and a hemp hat.
Avoid cancer from diet, eat hemp seed, .01% THC content, best vegetable nutrition on the planet.
Avoid cancer from lack of exercise, WORK a hemp field!

And after all that, if you do get some cancer from all the pollution, well at least you won't waste away vomitting from chemo, if you just toke a few hits.



[edit on 8-5-2005 by Legalizer]



posted on May, 8 2005 @ 09:31 AM
link   
Here's an interesting website about a plant called Cancer Bush. I shouldn't have to explain too much what it does just by the name.


www.sutherlandia.org...

Here's an bit from the main page. I'm not sure how much of these properties have been proven.

The indigenous, folk, and contemporary uses of

Sutherlandia include use as a tonic for:

* enhancing well-being
* immune support
* longevity
* stress, depression and anxiety
* wasting from cancer, TB, and AIDS
* quality-of-life tonic for cancers, HIV/AIDS and TB
* appetite stimulant in wasted patients, but not in healthy people.
* influenza
* Chronic Fatigues Syndrome, ME Syndrome and Yuppie Flu
* viral hepatitis
* asthma and bronchitis
* type 2 diabetes
* mild to moderate hypertension
* rheumatoid arthritis
* peptic ulcer, gastritis, and reflux oesophagitis
* hot flashes and irritability in menopause



posted on May, 8 2005 @ 01:33 PM
link   
www.macrobiotic.org...



After successfully curing cancer in animals, Dr. Rife opened a clinic in 1934 which successfully cured 16 of 16 cases within 90 days. Working with some of the most respected researchers in America, as well as leading doctors from southern California, he was able to eliminate cancer viruses so that patients' immune systems could restore health.

A special research committee at the University of Southern California oversaw the laboratory research and the experimental treatments until 1939. Follow-up clinics conducted by the head of the U.S.C. Medical Committee in 1935, 1936 and 1937 verified the results of the 1934 clinic. Independent physicians using Dr. Rife's frequency generators successfully treated as many as 40 people per day during those years.


Cure 100% and its covered up! 5 Easy steps to give you cancer and there is 1 simple cure instead "they" make you suffer from chemo, etc. Among other illnesses. This information made me feel sick seeing that the all this medical ingenuity is hidden from public view. 1 in 3 people in the UK will get cancer in one form or another and the ad's for cancer research is still going on when we can cure it with ease.

And the people just let the pharm companies heard us like cows to our death. Its madness!



posted on May, 8 2005 @ 01:37 PM
link   
Well said Lord Goofus! seize the day!


You have voted LordGoofus for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join