It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Children of the Law of One: The Lost Teachings of Atlantis

page: 5
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in


posted on Jun, 1 2008 @ 01:08 PM

Originally posted by Hanslune
"The LORD smote all the firstborn in the land."
After God has sufficiently hardened the Pharaoh's heart (Ex.11:10), he kills all the firstborn Egyptian children. When he was finished "there was not a house where there was not one dead." Finally, he runs out of little babies to kill, so he slaughters the firstborn cattle, too.
What the Bible says about children and God

If you take the religious viewpoint, then we learned our violence from the big guy.

You are absolutely and Undeniably Correct IMHO....All Religions hold some Truths...the fact of the matter is Religions by Design instill Seperateness from Oneness...Unity as it were...

All Religions throughout the Past, Present and Future...will cling to the Belief that they need to fight something or someone in order to be "Right" and "be" in favour of their God....

Religions are designed to Control and Manipulate via Fear and Guilt etc....
Religions say that "GOD" wants your money...and if you don't give it can never find peace and happiness and "Return" to GOD....

Yes....Religions and Spirituality are two total and utter different beings...

Spirituality in the very essence of Truth and Light....Unselfish Love...Universal Consciousness....Universal Oneness...having the understanding that we are all One....

posted on Jun, 1 2008 @ 01:52 PM
Our evolution from hunted, to hunters, gave us a violent side. Necessary to survive.

It will take a great deal of time to deal with that ingrained evolution.

posted on Jun, 1 2008 @ 03:11 PM
It has nothing to do with that really. It has to do with the fact that humans have developed a seperate selfish conciousness which percieves itself as seperate from the rest of the universe. Original humans were more like angelic beings before they were trapped in materiality on the earth plane.

Lucifer is in fact the human mind and human seperate conciousness. Only if the mind can die and ego be given up, can a Near death Experience be brought on and Universal conciousness be re-gained.

posted on Jun, 1 2008 @ 03:40 PM

Original humans were more like angelic beings before they were trapped in materiality on the earth plane.

Hmmm how do you explain the 400 neanderthal and hundreds of other Sapien remains showing we weren't angelic beings but evolved from an earlier hominid ancestor?

posted on Jun, 1 2008 @ 10:52 PM
I think you just answered your very own question....

posted on Jun, 1 2008 @ 10:53 PM
The answer is right in front of you....

posted on Jun, 1 2008 @ 11:03 PM
Although the prevailing school of thought in medicine is still leaning toward the
“physical effect on the body” viewpoint (as opposed to fully accepting the ramifications
of the “mental effect on the body” viewpoint), things have changed (and are
still changing—sometimes with a vengeance). More and more, the separate realms
are being considered together. Chemicals, hormones, electrical impulses, etc., are
being looked at in light of their effect on the mind and emotions. But possibly even
more important, the mind and emotions are being looked at in the light of their
effect on chemicals, hormones, electrical impulses ... and much more. The effect
the mind can have on the body is almost staggering when you first realize it. It
seems unbelievable at times, yet there it is, a veritable mountain of individuals’ personal
experiences that attest to the facts. The mind’s power over the body is very
real indeed.

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:04 AM
Acting in ways that create positive karma may not always have the appearance of
doing something good. And doing something that appears to be good, may not

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:05 AM
always create positive karma, it could even create negative karma. For instance,
you could decide that being charitable is good, giving away money to the poor is

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:05 AM
good. That certainly is good in general. But consider this. Let’s say you come
across a poor man lying in the cold street, and he holds out his hand to you silent

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:06 AM
asking for money to help him. You have choices to make. How are you going
to know what is best. If you are following the charitable route, you may give him a

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:07 AM
great deal of money, thinking you are doing the right thing. But there are many
things you cannot know just by yourself, and you need Universal guidance to really

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:07 AM
do the right thing. Sure, he might use that money to buy warm clothing, shelter,
create a livelihood, and live happily ever after. But he also might use it to buy drugs

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:08 AM
or alcohol, and end up in a stupor in which he gets harmed or killed, or even does
so to someone else. On the other hand, maybe this man is psychologically ‘set’ just

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:09 AM
so - and if instead of giving him anything, you were to scream an insult at him
instead - perhaps he would say to himself, ‘That’s it! I’ve had enough of this human

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:11 AM
degradation!’, and pick himself up out of his self made hole, get himself work shoveling
Yak dung, then continue to improve his conditions, and/or himself, and ends

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:12 AM
up finally living happily ever after. So while yelling at him would have been the right
thing to do, to someone who just saw you yelling at this poor man, it would appear

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:13 AM
that you were being cruel and heartless, not doing something good.
Some of these things can be known by an enlightened being trained in prophe

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:13 AM
as you will be. But other things can only be known in the higher levels of consciousness
outside the limits of our physical existence.”

posted on Jun, 2 2008 @ 12:44 AM

You might want to reconsider using a series of two-line posts in a running commentary.

<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in